IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v50y2002i3p433-448.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Optimization Procedures for the Capacitated Euclidean and l p Distance Multifacility Location-Allocation Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Hanif D. Sherali

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering (0118), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061)

  • Intesar Al-Loughani

    (Department of Mathematics, Kuwait University, Safar, Kuwait)

  • Shivaram Subramanian

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering (0118), Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061)

Abstract

In this paper, we study the capacitated Euclidean and l p distance location-allocation problems. There exists no global optimization algorithm that has been developed and tested for this class of problems, aside from a total enumeration approach. Beginning with the Euclidean distance problem, we design a branch-and-bound algorithm based on a partitioning of the allocation space that finitely converges to a global optimum for this nonconvex problem. For deriving lower bounds at node subproblems in this partial enumeration scheme, we employ two types of procedures. The first approach computes a lower bound via a projected location space subproblem. The second approach derives a significantly enhanced lower bound by using a Reformulation-Linearization Technique (RLT) to transform an equivalent representation of the original nonconvex problem into a higher dimensional linear programming relaxation. In addition, certain cut-set inequalities are generated in the allocation space, and objective function based cuts are derived in the location space to further tighten the lower bounding relaxation. The RLT procedure is then extended to the general l p distance problem, for p > 1. Computational experience is provided on a set of test problems to investigate both the projected location space and the RLT-lower bounding schemes. The results indicate that the proposed global optimization approach using the RLT-based scheme offers a promising viable solution procedure. In fact, among the problems solved, for the only two test instances available in the literature for the Euclidean distance case, we report significantly improved solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanif D. Sherali & Intesar Al-Loughani & Shivaram Subramanian, 2002. "Global Optimization Procedures for the Capacitated Euclidean and l p Distance Multifacility Location-Allocation Problems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 433-448, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:50:y:2002:i:3:p:433-448
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.50.3.433.7739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.50.3.433.7739
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.50.3.433.7739?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leon Cooper, 1972. "The Transportation-Location Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 94-108, February.
    2. Jack Brimberg & Robert F. Love, 1993. "Global Convergence of a Generalized Iterative Procedure for the Minisum Location Problem with lp Distances," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(6), pages 1153-1163, December.
    3. Pey-Chun Chen & Pierre Hansen & Brigitte Jaumard & Hoang Tuy, 1998. "Solution of the Multisource Weber and Conditional Weber Problems by D.-C. Programming," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 46(4), pages 548-562, August.
    4. Tom M. Cavalier & Hanif D. Sherali, 1986. "Euclidean Distance Location-Allocation Problems with Uniform Demands over Convex Polygons," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 107-116, May.
    5. Richard E. Wendell & Arthur P. Hurter, 1973. "Location Theory, Dominance, and Convexity," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 314-320, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. N Aras & M Orbay & I K Altinel, 2008. "Efficient heuristics for the rectilinear distance capacitated multi-facility Weber problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(1), pages 64-79, January.
    2. Cristiana L. Lara & Francisco Trespalacios & Ignacio E. Grossmann, 2018. "Global optimization algorithm for capacitated multi-facility continuous location-allocation problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 71(4), pages 871-889, August.
    3. M. Hakan Akyüz & Temel Öncan & İ. Kuban Altınel, 2019. "Branch and bound algorithms for solving the multi-commodity capacitated multi-facility Weber problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 279(1), pages 1-42, August.
    4. Necati Aras & İ. Kuban Altınel & Metin Orbay, 2007. "New heuristic methods for the capacitated multi‐facility Weber problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 21-32, February.
    5. A Lim & Z Xu & F Wang, 2008. "The bidding selection and assignment problem with minimum quantity commitment," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(5), pages 693-702, May.
    6. M. Akyüz & İ. Altınel & Temel Öncan, 2014. "Location and allocation based branch and bound algorithms for the capacitated multi-facility Weber problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 45-71, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Hakan Akyüz & Temel Öncan & İ. Kuban Altınel, 2019. "Branch and bound algorithms for solving the multi-commodity capacitated multi-facility Weber problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 279(1), pages 1-42, August.
    2. M. Akyüz & İ. Altınel & Temel Öncan, 2014. "Location and allocation based branch and bound algorithms for the capacitated multi-facility Weber problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 222(1), pages 45-71, November.
    3. Jack Brimberg & Pierre Hansen & Nenad Mladenović & Eric D. Taillard, 2000. "Improvements and Comparison of Heuristics for Solving the Uncapacitated Multisource Weber Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(3), pages 444-460, June.
    4. N Aras & M Orbay & I K Altinel, 2008. "Efficient heuristics for the rectilinear distance capacitated multi-facility Weber problem," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(1), pages 64-79, January.
    5. Necati Aras & İ. Kuban Altınel & Metin Orbay, 2007. "New heuristic methods for the capacitated multi‐facility Weber problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 21-32, February.
    6. AltInel, I. Kuban & Durmaz, Engin & Aras, Necati & ÖzkIsacIk, Kerem Can, 2009. "A location-allocation heuristic for the capacitated multi-facility Weber problem with probabilistic customer locations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(3), pages 790-799, November.
    7. James F. Campbell, 1992. "Location‐allocation for distribution to a uniform demand with transshipments," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(5), pages 635-649, August.
    8. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner, 2019. "Cooperative Cover of Uniform Demand," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 819-831, September.
    9. Pawel Kalczynski & Jack Brimberg & Zvi Drezner, 2022. "Less is more: discrete starting solutions in the planar p-median problem," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(1), pages 34-59, April.
    10. João Carlos O. Souza & Paulo Roberto Oliveira & Antoine Soubeyran, 2016. "Global convergence of a proximal linearized algorithm for difference of convex functions," Post-Print hal-01440298, HAL.
    11. Zvi Drezner & Jack Brimberg & Nenad Mladenović & Said Salhi, 2016. "New local searches for solving the multi-source Weber problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 181-203, November.
    12. Tammy Drezner & Zvi Drezner & Dawit Zerom, 2023. "The Obnoxious Competitive Facility Location Model," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 885-903, December.
    13. Stefan Nickel & Justo Puerto & Antonio M. Rodriguez-Chia, 2003. "An Approach to Location Models Involving Sets as Existing Facilities," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 693-715, November.
    14. Victor Blanco & Justo Puerto & Safae El Haj Ben Ali, 2014. "Revisiting several problems and algorithms in continuous location with $$\ell _\tau $$ ℓ τ norms," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 563-595, July.
    15. Carrizosa, E. & Frenk, J.B.G., 1996. "Dominating Sets for Convex Functions with some Applications," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 9657-/A, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    16. Nagy, Gabor & Salhi, Said, 2007. "Location-routing: Issues, models and methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 649-672, March.
    17. Zhongxiu Peng & Cong Wang & Wenqing Xu & Jinsong Zhang, 2022. "Research on Location-Routing Problem of Maritime Emergency Materials Distribution Based on Bi-Level Programming," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-23, April.
    18. Zvi Drezner & Mozart B. C. Menezes, 2016. "The wisdom of voters: evaluating the Weber objective in the plane at the Condorcet solution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 246(1), pages 205-226, November.
    19. Kaisa Joki & Adil M. Bagirov & Napsu Karmitsa & Marko M. Mäkelä, 2017. "A proximal bundle method for nonsmooth DC optimization utilizing nonconvex cutting planes," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 68(3), pages 501-535, July.
    20. Canos, M. J. & Ivorra, C. & Liern, V., 1999. "An exact algorithm for the fuzzy p-median problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(1), pages 80-86, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:50:y:2002:i:3:p:433-448. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.