IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orited/v23y2023i2p84-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who’s Cheating? Mining Patterns of Collusion from Text and Events in Online Exams

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Cleophas

    (Institute for Business Management, Kiel University, Kiel 24098, Germany)

  • Christoph Hönnige

    (Institute for Political Science, Leibniz University Hanover, Hanover 30167, Germany)

  • Frank Meisel

    (Institute for Business Management, Kiel University, Kiel 24098, Germany)

  • Philipp Meyer

    (Institute for Political Science, Leibniz University Hanover, Hanover 30167, Germany)

Abstract

As the COVID-19 pandemic motivated a shift to virtual teaching, exams have increasingly moved online too. Detecting cheating through collusion is not easy when tech-savvy students take online exams at home and on their own devices. Such online at-home exams may tempt students to collude and share materials and answers. However, online exams’ digital output also enables computer-aided detection of collusion patterns. This paper presents two simple data-driven techniques to analyze exam event logs and essay-form answers. Based on examples from exams in social sciences, we show that such analyses can reveal patterns of student collusion. We suggest using these patterns to quantify the degree of collusion. Finally, we summarize a set of lessons learned about designing and analyzing online exams.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Cleophas & Christoph Hönnige & Frank Meisel & Philipp Meyer, 2023. "Who’s Cheating? Mining Patterns of Collusion from Text and Events in Online Exams," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 84-94, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:23:y:2023:i:2:p:84-94
    DOI: 10.1287/ited.2021.0260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ited.2021.0260
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ited.2021.0260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas C. Sharkey & Sarah G. Nurre, 2016. "Video Tutorials Within an Undergraduate Operations Research Course: Student Perception on Their Integration and Creating A Blended Learning Environment," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, September.
    2. John Miltenburg, 2019. "Online Teaching in a Large, Required, Undergraduate Management Science Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 89-104, January.
    3. Christina R. Scherrer, 2011. "Comparison of an Introductory Level Undergraduate Statistics Course Taught with Traditional, Hybrid, and Online Delivery Methods," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 11(3), pages 106-110, May.
    4. Sinjini Mitra & Gerard Beenen, 2019. "A Comparative Study of Learning Styles and Motivational Factors in Traditional and Online Sections of a Business Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 1-15, September.
    5. Oskar R. Harmon & James Lambrinos, 2008. "Are Online Exams an Invitation to Cheat?," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 116-125, April.
    6. Grimmer, Justin & Stewart, Brandon M., 2013. "Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(3), pages 267-297, July.
    7. Francesca Gino & Erin L. Krupka & Roberto A. Weber, 2013. "License to Cheat: Voluntary Regulation and Ethical Behavior," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(10), pages 2187-2203, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Miltenburg, 2019. "Online Teaching in a Large, Required, Undergraduate Management Science Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 89-104, January.
    2. Djourelova, Milena & Durante, Ruben, 2019. "Media Attention and Strategic Timing in Politics: Evidence from U.S. Presidential Executive Orders," CEPR Discussion Papers 13961, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    3. Bernhardt, Lea & Dewenter, Ralf & Thomas, Tobias, 2023. "Measuring partisan media bias in US newscasts from 2001 to 2012," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Ntentas, Raphael, 2021. "Quantifying political populism and examining the link with economic insecurity: evidence from Greece," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112579, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. James Demastus & Nancy E. Landrum, 2024. "Organizational sustainability schemes align with weak sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 707-725, February.
    6. Corgnet, Brice & Martin, Ludivine & Ndodjang, Peguy & Sutan, Angela, 2019. "On the merit of equal pay: Performance manipulation and incentive setting," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 23-45.
    7. Helena Seibicke & Asimina Michailidou, 2022. "The Challenges of Reconstructing Citizen-Driven EU Contestation in the Digital Media Sphere," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 97-107.
    8. Lin, Annie E. & Young, Jimmy A. & Guarino, Jeannine E., 2022. "Mother-Daughter sexual abuse: An exploratory study of the experiences of survivors of MDSA using Reddit," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    9. Yasuhiro Hara, "undated". "Dynamic Relationship between Information Dissemination by Local Governors and Mobility during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Discussion papers ron373, Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan.
    10. Thewissen, James & Shrestha, Prabal & Torsin, Wouter & Pastwa, Anna M., 2022. "Unpacking the black box of ICO white papers: A topic modeling approach," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    11. Natalie A. Carlson, 2023. "Differentiation in microenterprises," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 1141-1167, May.
    12. Mark Quigley & Jeremy D. Silver, 2022. "Science advocacy in political rhetoric and actions," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 462-476, September.
    13. Gabriele Camera, Rod Garratt, Cyril Monnet, 2024. "Truth by Consensus: A Theoretical and Empirical Investigation," Diskussionsschriften dp2404, Universitaet Bern, Departement Volkswirtschaft.
    14. Sanjit Dhami, 2017. "Human Ethics and Virtues: Rethinking the Homo-Economicus Model," CESifo Working Paper Series 6836, CESifo.
    15. Merz, Nicolas & Regel, Sven & Lewandowski, Jirka, 2016. "The Manifesto Corpus: A new resource for research on political parties and quantitative text analysis," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 3(2 (April-), pages 1-8.
    16. Luis Vila-Henninger & Claire Dupuy & Virginie Van Ingelgom & Mauro Caprioli & Ferdinand Teuber & Damien Pennetreau & Margherita Bussi & Cal Le Gall, 2024. "Abductive Coding: Theory Building and Qualitative (Re)Analysis," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 53(2), pages 968-1001, May.
    17. Rico H Herzog & Juliana E Gonçalves & Geertje Slingerland & Reinout Kleinhans & Holger Prang & Frances Brazier & Trivik Verma, 2024. "Cities for citizens! Public value spheres for understanding conflicts in urban planning," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(7), pages 1327-1344, May.
    18. Bastiaan Bruinsma & Moa Johansson, 2024. "Finding the structure of parliamentary motions in the Swedish Riksdag 1971–2015," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(4), pages 3275-3301, August.
    19. Anselm Küsters, 2022. "Applying Lessons from the Past? Exploring Historical Analogies in ECB Speeches through Text Mining, 1997–2019," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 18(1), pages 277-329, March.
    20. Rybinski, Krzysztof, 2020. "The forecasting power of the multi-language narrative of sell-side research: A machine learning evaluation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orited:v:23:y:2023:i:2:p:84-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.