IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v35y2024i1p339-362.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Consumer Acquisition for Recommender Systems: A Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Xuan Bi

    (Information and Decision Sciences, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455)

  • Mochen Yang

    (Information and Decision Sciences, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455)

  • Gediminas Adomavicius

    (Information and Decision Sciences, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455)

Abstract

We consider a marketplace where a recommender system provider (the firm) offers incentives to acquire prospective consumers by leveraging information that a market intermediary collects about these consumers. We investigate a model of consumer acquisition that incorporates several factors affecting acquisition decisions, including the value that a consumer contributes to the recommender system, the cost of participation to the consumer (e.g., privacy loss), and the value that a consumer can derive from the system due to network externality created by existing consumers. Our model is dynamic in nature, where the firm iteratively decides the next acquisition target based on previously realized acquisition outcomes. We propose flexible data-driven procedures to estimate some of the key parameters in the model using consumers’ data collected by the market intermediary, for example their historical consumption data or the consumption data of other similar consumers. We also design an algorithm to compute the dynamic acquisition sequence and the corresponding incentives to offer. We conduct simulation-based empirical evaluations on two canonical recommendation tasks: movie recommendation based on numerical ratings and product offer recommendation based on browsing (clicking) behaviors and benchmark our acquisition model with random acquisition sequences with respect to (i) firm utility, (ii) recommender system performance, and (iii) consumer surplus. We find nuanced relationships between the firm’s choice of incentive strategies and acquisition outcomes. Specifically, neither a constant strategy (setting the same incentive for all consumers) nor a fully greedy strategy (extracting all cumulative network externality) is optimal on all acquisition outcomes. Under a moderately greedy strategy, where the firm only partially extracts the cumulative network externality from consumers, the dynamic acquisition sequence can outperform random sequences on three acquisition outcomes simultaneously. Our work contributes a novel theoretical framework, practical insights, and design artifacts to facilitate effective consumer acquisition in recommender systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuan Bi & Mochen Yang & Gediminas Adomavicius, 2024. "Consumer Acquisition for Recommender Systems: A Theoretical Framework and Empirical Evaluations," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 339-362, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:339-362
    DOI: 10.1287/isre.2023.1229
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.2023.1229
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/isre.2023.1229?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Brynjolfsson & Yu (Jeffrey) Hu & Duncan Simester, 2011. "Goodbye Pareto Principle, Hello Long Tail: The Effect of Search Costs on the Concentration of Product Sales," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(8), pages 1373-1386, August.
    2. Ariel Rubinstein, 2003. ""Economics and Psychology"? The Case of Hyperbolic Discounting," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 44(4), pages 1207-1216, November.
    3. Maytal Saar-Tsechansky & Prem Melville & Foster Provost, 2009. "Active Feature-Value Acquisition," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(4), pages 664-684, April.
    4. Avi Goldfarb & Catherine E. Tucker, 2011. "Privacy Regulation and Online Advertising," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 57-71, January.
    5. Partha Dasgupta & Eric Maskin, 2005. "Uncertainty and Hyperbolic Discounting," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 95(4), pages 1290-1299, September.
    6. Geoffrey G. Parker & Marshall W. Van Alstyne, 2005. "Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(10), pages 1494-1504, October.
    7. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1986. "Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 94(4), pages 822-841, August.
    8. Burhaneddin Sandıkçı & Lisa M. Maillart & Andrew J. Schaefer & Oguzhan Alagoz & Mark S. Roberts, 2008. "Estimating the Patient's Price of Privacy in Liver Transplantation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 1393-1410, December.
    9. Xuan Bi & Annie Qu & Junhui Wang & Xiaotong Shen, 2017. "A Group-Specific Recommender System," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 112(519), pages 1344-1353, July.
    10. Jing Wang & Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis & Foster Provost, 2017. "Cost-Effective Quality Assurance in Crowd Labeling," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 137-158, March.
    11. Economides, Nicholas, 1996. "Network externalities, complementarities, and invitations to enter," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 211-233, September.
    12. Alessandro Acquisti & Curtis Taylor & Liad Wagman, 2016. "The Economics of Privacy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 54(2), pages 442-492, June.
    13. Maytal Saar-Tsechansky & Foster Provost, 2007. "Decision-Centric Active Learning of Binary-Outcome Models," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 4-22, March.
    14. Heimbach, Irina & Gottschlich, Jörg & Hinz, Oliver, 2015. "The Value of User's Facebook Profile Data for Product Recommendation Generation," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 77135, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    15. Dokyun Lee & Kartik Hosanagar, 2019. "How Do Recommender Systems Affect Sales Diversity? A Cross-Category Investigation via Randomized Field Experiment," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 239-259, March.
    16. Gediminas Adomavicius & Jesse C. Bockstedt & Shawn P. Curley & Jingjing Zhangc, 2018. "Effects of Online Recommendations on Consumers’ Willingness to Pay," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 84-102, March.
    17. Katz, Michael L & Shapiro, Carl, 1985. "Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(3), pages 424-440, June.
    18. Kartik Hosanagar & Daniel Fleder & Dokyun Lee & Andreas Buja, 2014. "Will the Global Village Fracture Into Tribes? Recommender Systems and Their Effects on Consumer Fragmentation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(4), pages 805-823, April.
    19. David Laibson, 1997. "Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(2), pages 443-478.
    20. Meghana Deodhar & Joydeep Ghosh & Maytal Saar-Tsechansky & Vineet Keshari, 2017. "Active Learning with Multiple Localized Regression Models," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 503-522, August.
    21. Alessandro Acquisti & Leslie K. John & George Loewenstein, 2013. "What Is Privacy Worth?," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 42(2), pages 249-274.
    22. Gediminas Adomavicius & YoungOk Kwon, 2014. "Optimization-Based Approaches for Maximizing Aggregate Recommendation Diversity," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 351-369, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuan Bi & Gediminas Adomavicius & William Li & Annie Qu, 2022. "Improving Sales Forecasting Accuracy: A Tensor Factorization Approach with Demand Awareness," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1644-1660, May.
    2. Xitong Li & Jörn Grahl & Oliver Hinz, 2022. "How Do Recommender Systems Lead to Consumer Purchases? A Causal Mediation Analysis of a Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 620-637, June.
    3. Molaie, Mir Majid & Lee, Wonjae, 2022. "Economic corollaries of personalized recommendations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    4. Bruno Jullien & Alessandro Pavan & Marc Rysman, 2021. "Two-sided markets, pricing, and network effects," Post-Print hal-03828345, HAL.
    5. Hagiu, Andrei & Hałaburda, Hanna, 2014. "Information and two-sided platform profits," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 25-35.
    6. Howell, Bronwyn, 2006. "Unveiling 'Invisible Hands': Two-Sided Platforms in Health Care Markets," Working Paper Series 3841, Victoria University of Wellington, The New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
    7. Cecere, Grazia & Le Guel, Fabrice & Soulié, Nicolas, 2012. "Perceived Internet privacy concerns on social network in Europe," MPRA Paper 41437, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Naskar, Mili & Pal, Rupayan, 2020. "Network externalities and process R&D: A Cournot–Bertrand comparison," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 51-58.
    9. Matutes, Carmen & Regibeau, Pierre, 1996. "A selective review of the economics of standardization. Entry deterrence, technological progress and international competition," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 183-209, September.
    10. Nicholas Economides, 1997. "The Economics of Networks," Brazilian Electronic Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, vol. 1(0), December.
    11. van de Kaa, Geerten & Papachristos, George & de Bruijn, Hans, 2019. "The governance of platform development processes: A metaphor and a simulation model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 190-203.
    12. Fabio Manenti & Ernesto Somma, 2008. "One-Way Compatibility, Two-Way Compatibility and Entry in Network Industries," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 301-322.
    13. Marco Casari, 2009. "Pre-commitment and flexibility in a time decision experiment," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 117-141, April.
    14. Zeng, Jing & Khan, Zaheer & De Silva, Muthu, 2019. "The emergence of multi-sided platform MNEs: Internalization theory and networks," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 1-1.
    15. Helia Marreiros & Mirco Tonin & Michael Vlassopoulos & M.C. Schraefel, 2016. "“Now that you mention it”: A Survey Experiment on Information, Salience and Online Privacy," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS34, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    16. Daniel Birke, 2009. "The Economics Of Networks: A Survey Of The Empirical Literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(4), pages 762-793, September.
    17. Edward G. Anderson & Geoffrey G. Parker & Burcu Tan, 2014. "Platform Performance Investment in the Presence of Network Externalities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(1), pages 152-172, March.
    18. Gautier, Pieter A. & van Vuuren, Aico, 2011. "A Flexible Test for Present Bias and Time Preferences Using Land-Lease Contracts," IZA Discussion Papers 5821, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Takeuchi, Kan, 2011. "Non-parametric test of time consistency: Present bias and future bias," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 456-478, March.
    20. Ruiqi Rich Zhu & Cheng He & Yu Jeffrey Hu, 2023. "The Effect of Product Recommendations on Online Investor Behaviors," Papers 2303.14263, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:35:y:2024:i:1:p:339-362. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.