IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orisre/v29y2018i1p169-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contextual Priming and the Design of 3D Virtual Environments to Improve Group Ideation

Author

Listed:
  • Akshay Bhagwatwar

    (Amazon.com, Seattle, Washington 98121)

  • Anne Massey

    (Operations and Information Management, Wisconsin School of Business, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706)

  • Alan Dennis

    (Operations and Decision Technologies, Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405)

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) virtual environments (VEs) are collaboration platforms where group members are represented as avatars and interact in a customizable simulated world. Research from cognitive psychology has shown that it is possible to manipulate nonconscious cognition and behavior through “priming,” a well-known phenomenon in which words and images are used to activate desired concepts in participants’ minds. Our goal in this was to investigate whether priming during the task execution (called contextual priming) using 3D objects in the VE can improve brainstorming performance. To investigate this, we conducted two studies. The first used priming objects specifically related to the task topic and the second used priming objects related to creativity, in general. Compared to VEs without 3D priming objects, our results show that when groups brainstormed in the VEs designed with 3D priming objects, they generated better quality ideas as well as a greater breadth and depth of ideas. Thus, the 3D priming stimuli incorporated in a VE enhances brainstorming, which indicates that the design of VE has a direct effect on team brainstorming performance. Our results also show that target concept activation and task absorption act as the underlying mechanisms, partially mediating the relationship between the design of the VE (i.e., the presence or absence of priming objects) and performance outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Akshay Bhagwatwar & Anne Massey & Alan Dennis, 2018. "Contextual Priming and the Design of 3D Virtual Environments to Improve Group Ideation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 169-185, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:29:y:2018:i:1:p:169-185
    DOI: isre.2017.0721
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/isre.2017.0721
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/isre.2017.0721?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richins, Marsha L, 1991. "Social Comparison and the Idealized Images of Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(1), pages 71-83, June.
    2. Allen S. Lee & Richard L. Baskerville, 2003. "Generalizing Generalizability in Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 14(3), pages 221-243, September.
    3. Alan R. Dennis & Joseph S. Valacich, 1999. "Research Note. Electronic Brainstorming: Illusions and Patterns of Productivity," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 10(4), pages 375-377, December.
    4. Deborah Compeau & Barbara Marcolin & Helen Kelley & Chris Higgins, 2012. "Research Commentary ---Generalizability of Information Systems Research Using Student Subjects---A Reflection on Our Practices and Recommendations for Future Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1093-1109, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yu-Shan Chang & Yen-Yin Wang & Hsin-Jou Tsai, 2024. "The Metaverse in Green Building Concept Learning, Creative Design Performance, and Learning Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-17, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuan Li & William J. Kettinger, 2022. "Testing the Relationship Between Information and Knowledge in Computer-Aided Decision-Making," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1827-1843, December.
    2. Christoph Weinert & Christian Maier & Sven Laumer & Tim Weitzel, 2020. "Technostress mitigation: an experimental study of social support during a computer freeze," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(8), pages 1199-1249, September.
    3. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Irani, Zahir & Choy, King-Lun & Filippi, Lionel & Papadopoulos, Thanos, 2015. "Performance measures and metrics in outsourcing decisions: A review for research and applications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 153-166.
    4. Liu, Chihling & Keeling, Debbie Isobel & Hogg, Margaret K., 2016. "Strategy narratives and wellbeing challenges: The role of everyday self-presentation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 234-243.
    5. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.
    6. Philip Law, 2010. "Examination of the actual turnover decisions of female auditors in public accounting: Evidence from Hong Kong," Managerial Auditing Journal, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 25(5), pages 484-502, May.
    7. Emmanuelle Vaast & Geoff Walsham, 2009. "Trans-Situated Learning: Supporting a Network of Practice with an Information Infrastructure," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 547-564, December.
    8. Cornelis, Erlinde & Peter, Paula C., 2017. "The real campaign: The role of authenticity in the effectiveness of advertising disclaimers in digitally enhanced images," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 102-112.
    9. Michael Vössing & Niklas Kühl & Matteo Lind & Gerhard Satzger, 2022. "Designing Transparency for Effective Human-AI Collaboration," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 877-895, June.
    10. Zhewei Zhang & Youngjin Yoo & Kalle Lyytinen & Aron Lindberg, 2021. "The Unknowability of Autonomous Tools and the Liminal Experience of Their Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1192-1213, December.
    11. Dragos Vieru & Pierre-Emmanuel Arduin, 2016. "Sharing Knowledge in a Shared Services Center Context: An Explanatory Case Study of the Dialectics of Formal and Informal Practices," Post-Print hal-01458031, HAL.
    12. Delin Zeng & Xiangfei Fu & Taohua Ouyang, 2018. "Implementing Green IT Transformation for Sustainability: A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-16, June.
    13. Marie-José Avenier & Catherine Thomas, 2015. "Finding one's way around various methodological guidelines for doing rigorous case studies: A comparison of four epistemological frameworks [Se frayer un chemin parmi les différentes recommandation," Post-Print halshs-01491454, HAL.
    14. Krzeminska, Anna & Lundmark, Erik & Härtel, Charmine E.J., 2021. "Legitimation of a heterogeneous market category through covert prototype differentiation," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 36(2).
    15. IRINA OLIMPIA SUSANU & Nicoleta Cristache & Adrian MICU, 2016. "The Influence of Advertising Practice Corporate Social Responsibility," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 2(1), pages 201-208, July.
    16. Klesse, Anne-Kathrin & Goukens, Caroline & Geyskens, Kelly & de Ruyter, Ko, 2012. "Repeated exposure to the thin ideal and implications for the self: Two weight loss program studies," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 29(4), pages 355-362.
    17. David Bickham & Yulin Hswen & Michael Rich, 2015. "Media use and depression: exposure, household rules, and symptoms among young adolescents in the USA," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(2), pages 147-155, February.
    18. Möhlmann, Mareike, 2021. "Unjustified trust beliefs: Trust conflation on sharing economy platforms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).
    19. David A. Griffith & Hannah S. Lee & Goksel Yalcinkaya, 2023. "Understanding the relationship between advertising spending and happiness at the country level," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(1), pages 128-150, February.
    20. François-Xavier de Vaujany & Emmanuelle Vaast, 2014. "If These Walls Could Talk: The Mutual Construction of Organizational Space and Legitimacy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 713-731, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orisre:v:29:y:2018:i:1:p:169-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.