IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v40y2010i5p385-396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improving New-Product Forecasting at Intel Corporation

Author

Listed:
  • S. David Wu

    (P. C. Rossin College of Engineering and Applied Science, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015)

  • Karl G. Kempf

    (Decision Technologies Group, Intel Corporation, Chandler, Arizona 85226)

  • Mehmet O. Atan

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015)

  • Berrin Aytac

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015)

  • Shamin A. Shirodkar

    (Customer Planning and Logistics Group, Intel Corporation, Chandler, Arizona 85226)

  • Asima Mishra

    (Customer Planning and Logistics Group, Intel Corporation, Chandler, Arizona 85226)

Abstract

Forecasting demand for new products is becoming increasingly difficult as the technology treadmill continually drives product life cycles shorter. The task is even more challenging for electronic goods; these products have life cycles measured in quarters, manufacturing processes measured in months, and market volatility that takes place on a day-to-day basis. We present a model that perpetually reduces forecast variance as new market information is acquired over time. Our model extends Bass' original idea of product diffusion [Bass, F. M. 1969. A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Sci . 15 (5) 215--227] to a more comprehensive theoretical setting. We first describe how forecast variances can be reduced when combining predictive information from multiple diffusion models. We then introduce the notion of demand-leading indicators in a Bayesian framework that reduces forecast variance by incorporating a wide variety of information emerging during the product life cycle. We describe a successful implementation of this model at Intel, where we tested one-third of the microprocessor products. When compared with the current forecasting method, our model reduced forecasting time from three days to two hours and decreased forecasting errors by 33 percent, leading to $11.8 million in cost savings over four months of demand realization.

Suggested Citation

  • S. David Wu & Karl G. Kempf & Mehmet O. Atan & Berrin Aytac & Shamin A. Shirodkar & Asima Mishra, 2010. "Improving New-Product Forecasting at Intel Corporation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 40(5), pages 385-396, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:40:y:2010:i:5:p:385-396
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.1100.0504
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.1100.0504
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.1100.0504?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John A. Norton & Frank M. Bass, 1987. "A Diffusion Theory Model of Adoption and Substitution for Successive Generations of High-Technology Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(9), pages 1069-1086, September.
    2. Abbas A. Kurawarwala & Hirofumi Matsuo, 1996. "Forecasting and Inventory Management of Short Life-Cycle Products," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 44(1), pages 131-150, February.
    3. S. David Wu & Berrin Aytac & Rosemary T. Berger & Chris A. Armbruster, 2006. "Managing Short Life-Cycle Technology Products for Agere Systems," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 234-247, June.
    4. G. Elliott & C. Granger & A. Timmermann (ed.), 2006. "Handbook of Economic Forecasting," Handbook of Economic Forecasting, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 1, number 1.
    5. Nigel Meade & Towhidul Islam, 1998. "Technological Forecasting---Model Selection, Model Stability, and Combining Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(8), pages 1115-1130, August.
    6. Frank M. Bass, 1969. "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 215-227, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hongmin Li & Dieter Armbruster & Karl G. Kempf, 2013. "A Population-Growth Model for Multiple Generations of Technology Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 343-360, July.
    2. Saurabh Bansal & Yaroslav Rosokha, 2018. "Impact of Compound and Reduced Specification on Valuation of Projects with Multiple Risks," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 27-46, March.
    3. Rahman Khorramfar & Osman Ozaltin & Reha Uzsoy & Karl Kempf, 2024. "Coordinating Resource Allocation during Product Transitions Using a Multifollower Bilevel Programming Model," Papers 2401.17402, arXiv.org.
    4. Goodwin, Paul & Meeran, Sheik & Dyussekeneva, Karima, 2014. "The challenges of pre-launch forecasting of adoption time series for new durable products," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 1082-1097.
    5. Chen Peng & Feryal Erhun & Erik F. Hertzler & Karl G. Kempf, 2012. "Capacity Planning in the Semiconductor Industry: Dual-Mode Procurement with Options," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 170-185, April.
    6. Chihyun Jung & Dae-Eun Lim, 2016. "Development of an Adaptive Forecasting System: A Case Study of a PC Manufacturer in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-12, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berrin Aytac & S. Wu, 2013. "Characterization of demand for short life-cycle technology products," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 203(1), pages 255-277, March.
    2. B Aytac & S D Wu, 2011. "Modelling high-tech product life cycles with short-term demand information: a case study," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(3), pages 425-432, March.
    3. Sohn, So Young & Lim, Michael, 2008. "The effect of forecasting and information sharing in SCM for multi-generation products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 186(1), pages 276-287, April.
    4. Kivi, Antero & Smura, Timo & Töyli, Juuso, 2012. "Technology product evolution and the diffusion of new product features," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 107-126.
    5. Stefan N. Groesser & Niklas Jovy, 2016. "Business model analysis using computational modeling: a strategy tool for exploration and decision-making," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 61-88, February.
    6. Zhiling Guo & Jianqing Chen, 2018. "Multigeneration Product Diffusion in the Presence of Strategic Consumers," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(1), pages 206-224, March.
    7. Stefan Groesser & Niklas Jovy, 2016. "Business model analysis using computational modeling: a strategy tool for exploration and decision-making," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 61-88, February.
    8. Shun-Chen Niu, 2006. "A Piecewise-Diffusion Model of New-Product Demands," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 678-695, August.
    9. Krishnan, Trichy V. & Feng, Shanfei & Jain, Dipak C., 2023. "Peak sales time prediction in new product sales: Can a product manager rely on it?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    10. Jha, Ashutosh & Saha, Debashis, 2020. "“Forecasting and analysing the characteristics of 3G and 4G mobile broadband diffusion in India: A comparative evaluation of Bass, Norton-Bass, Gompertz, and logistic growth models”," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    11. Rao, K. Usha & Kishore, V.V.N., 2010. "A review of technology diffusion models with special reference to renewable energy technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 1070-1078, April.
    12. Fildes, Robert & Kumar, V., 2002. "Telecommunications demand forecasting--a review," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 489-522.
    13. Meade, Nigel & Islam, Towhidul, 2006. "Modelling and forecasting the diffusion of innovation - A 25-year review," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 519-545.
    14. Samuel Sale, R. & Mesak, Hani I. & Inman, R. Anthony, 2017. "A dynamic marketing-operations interface model of new product updates," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(1), pages 233-242.
    15. Kejia Hu & Jason Acimovic & Francisco Erize & Douglas J. Thomas & Jan A. Van Mieghem, 2019. "Forecasting New Product Life Cycle Curves: Practical Approach and Empirical Analysis," Service Science, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 66-85, January.
    16. Cambier, Adrien & Chardy, Matthieu & Figueiredo, Rosa & Ouorou, Adam & Poss, Michael, 2022. "Optimizing subscriber migrations for a telecommunication operator in uncertain context," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 308-321.
    17. Shigeno, Hidenori & Matsuzaki, Taisuke & Ueki, Yasushi & Tsuji, Masatsugu, 2023. "The Effect of the Covid-19 Pandemic on the Innovation Process of Small and Medium-sized Regional Firms," 32nd European Regional ITS Conference, Madrid 2023: Realising the digital decade in the European Union – Easier said than done? 278018, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    18. Peres, Renana & Muller, Eitan & Mahajan, Vijay, 2010. "Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: A critical review and research directions," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 91-106.
    19. Kim, Namwoon & Srivastava, Rajendra K., 2007. "Modeling cross-price effects on inter-category dynamics: The case of three computing platforms," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 290-301, June.
    20. Fok, Dennis & Franses, Philip Hans, 2007. "Modeling the diffusion of scientific publications," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 139(2), pages 376-390, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:40:y:2010:i:5:p:385-396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.