IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v33y2003i6p7-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Management of Spare Parts in Closed-Loop Supply Chains—A System Dynamics Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Spengler

    (Department of Production Management, Institute for Economics and Business Administration, Braunschweig University of Technology, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany)

  • Marcus Schröter

    (Department of Production Management, Institute for Economics and Business Administration, Braunschweig University of Technology, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany)

Abstract

We developed tools for information management and spare-parts management in closed-loop supply chains. Our Internet-based information and communication platform provides data relevant to recycling based on Agfa-Gevaert's concept of a “recycling passport.” We defined what data is relevant based on the product-recovery strategy. Using system dynamics, we modeled an integrated production and recovery system for supplying spare parts to evaluate possible strategies for meeting spare-parts demand for electronic equipment in the end-of-life service period. We will implement these instruments and methods in a pilot study within our partner companies, Agfa-Gevaert AG and Electrocycling GmbH. Decision makers at Agfa-Gevaert will then be able to determine whether and how recovering components could reduce costs in spare-parts management in the end-of-life service period.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Spengler & Marcus Schröter, 2003. "Strategic Management of Spare Parts in Closed-Loop Supply Chains—A System Dynamics Approach," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 7-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:33:y:2003:i:6:p:7-17
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.33.6.7.25179
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.33.6.7.25179
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.33.6.7.25179?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R G Coyle, 1999. "Simulation by repeated optimisation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(4), pages 429-438, April.
    2. E R Larsen & D W Bunn, 1999. "Deregulation in electricity: understanding strategic and regulatory risk," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(4), pages 337-344, April.
    3. Teunter, Ruud H. & Fortuin, Leonard, 1998. "End-of-life service: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 107(1), pages 19-34, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ta-Yu Chen & Woo-Tsong Lin & Chwen Sheu, 2018. "A Dynamic Failure Rate Forecasting Model for Service Parts Inventory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Hu, Qiwei & Boylan, John E. & Chen, Huijing & Labib, Ashraf, 2018. "OR in spare parts management: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 395-414.
    3. Krikke, H.R. & van der Laan, E., 2009. "Last Time Buy and Control Policies With Phase-Out Returns : A Case Study in Plant Control Systems," Other publications TiSEM c1a3c438-6d31-4147-afd7-8, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Guzzo, Daniel & Rodrigues, Vinicius Picanço & Mascarenhas, Janaina, 2021. "A systems representation of the Circular Economy: Transition scenarios in the electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    5. Federico Cosenz & Guido Noto, 2016. "Applying System Dynamics Modelling to Strategic Management: A Literature Review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 703-741, November.
    6. Lin, Junyi & Naim, Mohamed M. & Tang, Ou, 2024. "In-house or outsourcing? The impact of remanufacturing strategies on the dynamics of component remanufacturing systems under lifecycle demand and returns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 965-979.
    7. Sinha, Rajib & Laurenti, Rafael & Singh, Jagdeep & Malmström, Maria E. & Frostell, Björn, 2016. "Identifying ways of closing the metal flow loop in the global mobile phone product system: A system dynamics modeling approach," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 65-76.
    8. Ramanathan, Usha & He, Qile & Subramanian, Nachiappan & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Sarpong, David, 2023. "Collaborative closed-loop supply chain framework for sustainable manufacturing: Evidence from the Indian packaging industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    9. Nuramilawahida Mat Ropi & Hawa Hishamuddin & Dzuraidah Abd Wahab & Wakhid Ahmad Jauhari & Fatin Amrina A. Rashid & Nor Kamaliana Khamis & Intan Fadhlina Mohamed & Mohd Anas Mohd Sabri & Mohd Radzi Abu, 2023. "Optimal Lot-Sizing Decisions for a Remanufacturing Production System under Spare Parts Supply Disruption," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-19, September.
    10. Xiangyun Chang & Junjie Fan & Yabing Zhao & Jie Wu, 2016. "Impact of China’s Recycling Subsidy Policy in the Product Life Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-21, August.
    11. Jahangirian, Mohsen & Eldabi, Tillal & Naseer, Aisha & Stergioulas, Lampros K. & Young, Terry, 2010. "Simulation in manufacturing and business: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 203(1), pages 1-13, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberto Sardi & Enrico Sorano, 2019. "Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.
    2. A. Sardi & E. Sorano, 2021. "Dynamic Performance Management: An Approach for Managing the Common Goods," Papers 2102.04090, arXiv.org.
    3. Simon Pezzutto & Gianluca Grilli & Stefano Zambotti & Stefan Dunjic, 2018. "Forecasting Electricity Market Price for End Users in EU28 until 2020—Main Factors of Influence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    4. J. B. G. Frenk & Sonya Javadi & Semih O. Sezer, 2019. "An optimal stopping approach for the end-of-life inventory problem," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 90(3), pages 329-363, December.
    5. Pourakbar, Morteza & Dekker, Rommert, 2012. "Customer differentiated end-of-life inventory problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(1), pages 44-53.
    6. Arango, Santiago & Larsen, Erik, 2011. "Cycles in deregulated electricity markets: Empirical evidence from two decades," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 2457-2466, May.
    7. Krikke, H.R. & van der Laan, E., 2009. "Last Time Buy and Control Policies With Phase-Out Returns : A Case Study in Plant Control Systems," Discussion Paper 2009-66, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    8. Bunn, Derek W. & Oliveira, Fernando S., 2007. "Agent-based analysis of technological diversification and specialization in electricity markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(3), pages 1265-1278, September.
    9. Cattani, Kyle D. & Souza, Gilvan C., 2003. "Good buy? Delaying end-of-life purchases," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 216-228, April.
    10. M. Pourakbar & E. Laan & R. Dekker, 2014. "End-of-Life Inventory Problem with Phaseout Returns," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 23(9), pages 1561-1576, September.
    11. René Aïd, 2008. "Long-term risk management for utility companies: the next challenges," Working Papers hal-00409030, HAL.
    12. Arango, Santiago & Dyner, Isaac & Larsen, Erik R., 2006. "Lessons from deregulation: Understanding electricity markets in South America," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 196-207, September.
    13. Teufel, Felix & Miller, Michael & Genoese, Massimo & Fichtner, Wolf, 2013. "Review of System Dynamics models for electricity market simulations," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 2, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    14. Martínez-Jaramillo, Juan Esteban & van Ackere, Ann & Larsen, Erik R., 2020. "Towards a solar-hydro based generation: The case of Switzerland," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    15. J P J van Kooten & T Tan, 2009. "The final order problem for repairable spare parts under condemnation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(10), pages 1449-1461, October.
    16. Shin, Kong Joo & Managi, Shunsuke, 2017. "Liberalization of a retail electricity market: Consumer satisfaction and household switching behavior in Japan," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 675-685.
    17. Federico Cosenz & Guido Noto, 2016. "Applying System Dynamics Modelling to Strategic Management: A Literature Review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(6), pages 703-741, November.
    18. Karl Inderfurth & Kampan Mukherjee, 2008. "Decision support for spare parts acquisition in post product life cycle," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 16(1), pages 17-42, March.
    19. Pasaoglu, Güzay, 2011. "Using the decentralized and liberalized electricity market microworld (LEMM) as an educational tool," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 187-199, January.
    20. Sen Guo & Wenyue Zhang & Xiao Gao, 2020. "Business Risk Evaluation of Electricity Retail Company in China Using a Hybrid MCDM Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-21, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:33:y:2003:i:6:p:7-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.