IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v28y1998i1p53-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positioning for a Competitive Electric Industry with PG&E's Hydro-Thermal Optimization Model

Author

Listed:
  • Raymond B. Johnson

    (California Power Exchange, 1000 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91803)

  • Alva J. Svoboda

    (Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Business Consulting/Information Resource Management, PO Box 770000, San Francisco, California 94177)

  • Claudia Greif

    (PG&E, Utility Electric Supply Department)

  • Ali Vojdani

    (Perot Systems Corporation, 12377 Merit Drive, Dallas, Texas 75251)

  • Fulin Zhuang

    (PG&E, Transmission Planning)

Abstract

The Hydro-Thermal Optimization (HTO) system optimizes the weekly electric production schedules of Pacific Gas and Electric Company's diverse resource mix. PG&E developed HTO to reduce operating costs, forecast marginal costs, and position itself for competition. PG&E implemented the system after extensive prototyping and validation and uses HTO daily for unit commitment, hydro scheduling, energy trading, fuel forecasting, resource evaluation, and marginal cost-based pricing. PG&E estimates annual benefits of HTO conservatively at $15 million. On a broader scale, PG&E has used HTO to analyze auction protocols for a deregulated power market and demonstrated that use of HTO-like tools to administer a power auction, as is done in the UK, could result in profit distribution inequities among bidders. HTO thus enabled PG&E to support a profound change in California's restructuring of the electric industry, from the proposed UK-type pool to a decentralized decision-making framework in which bidders optimize their own operations. As a result, California's $20 billion electric-power market will realize increased efficiencies and savings for both taxpayers and consumers.

Suggested Citation

  • Raymond B. Johnson & Alva J. Svoboda & Claudia Greif & Ali Vojdani & Fulin Zhuang, 1998. "Positioning for a Competitive Electric Industry with PG&E's Hydro-Thermal Optimization Model," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 53-74, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:28:y:1998:i:1:p:53-74
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.28.1.53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.28.1.53
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.28.1.53?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yoshiro Ikura & George Gross & Gene Sand Hall, 1986. "PGandE’s State-of-the-Art Scheduling Tool for Hydro Systems," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 65-82, February.
    2. John A. Muckstadt & Sherri A. Koenig, 1977. "An Application of Lagrangian Relaxation to Scheduling in Power-Generation Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 387-403, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steve Batstone & Geoff Pritchard & Golbon Zakeri, 2016. "Noninvasive Test Scheduling in Live Electricity Markets at Transpower New Zealand," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 46(6), pages 482-492, December.
    2. Spyros Kontogiorgis, 2000. "Practical Piecewise-Linear Approximation for Monotropic Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 12(4), pages 324-340, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jinyeong Lee & Kyungcheol Shin & Young-Min Wi, 2024. "Decentralized Operations of Industrial Complex Microgrids Considering Corporate Power Purchase Agreements for Renewable Energy 100% Initiatives in South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-24, June.
    2. Ramteen Sioshansif & Ashlin Tignor, 2012. "Do Centrally Committed Electricity Markets Provide Useful Price Signals?," The Energy Journal, , vol. 33(4), pages 96-118, October.
    3. Payal Mitra & Soumendu Sarkar & Tarun Mehta & Atul Kumar, 2022. "Unit Commitment in a Federalized Power Market: A Mixed Integer Programming Approach," Working papers 323, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    4. Dong, Jizhe & Li, Yuanhan & Zuo, Shi & Wu, Xiaomei & Zhang, Zuyao & Du, Jiang, 2023. "An intraperiod arbitrary ramping-rate changing model in unit commitment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    5. Ramteen Sioshansi and Ashlin Tignor, 2012. "Do Centrally Committed Electricity Markets Provide Useful Price Signals?," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4).
    6. Johnson, Raymond B. & Oren, Shmuel S. & Svoboda, Alva J., 1997. "Equity and efficiency of unit commitment in competitive electricity markets," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(1), pages 9-19, March.
    7. L. A. C. Roque & D. B. M. M. Fontes & F. A. C. C. Fontes, 2014. "A hybrid biased random key genetic algorithm approach for the unit commitment problem," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 140-166, July.
    8. Heejung Park, 2022. "A Unit Commitment Model Considering Feasibility of Operating Reserves under Stochastic Optimization Framework," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Maturana, Jorge & Riff, Maria-Cristina, 2007. "Solving the short-term electrical generation scheduling problem by an adaptive evolutionary approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 179(3), pages 677-691, June.
    10. Richter, Lucas & Lehna, Malte & Marchand, Sophie & Scholz, Christoph & Dreher, Alexander & Klaiber, Stefan & Lenk, Steve, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence for Electricity Supply Chain automation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    11. Steeger, Gregory & Rebennack, Steffen, 2017. "Dynamic convexification within nested Benders decomposition using Lagrangian relaxation: An application to the strategic bidding problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 669-686.
    12. Feng, Chenjia & Shao, Chengcheng & Wang, Xifan, 2021. "CSP clustering in unit commitment for power system production cost modeling," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 1217-1228.
    13. C. L. Tseng & C. A. Li & S. S. Oren, 2000. "Solving the Unit Commitment Problem by a Unit Decommitment Method," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 105(3), pages 707-730, June.
    14. Kaleta, Mariusz & Toczylowski, Eugeniusz, 2008. "Restriction techniques for the unit-commitment problem with total procurement costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 2439-2448, July.
    15. Samer Takriti & Benedikt Krasenbrink & Lilian S.-Y. Wu, 2000. "Incorporating Fuel Constraints and Electricity Spot Prices into the Stochastic Unit Commitment Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 268-280, April.
    16. Dotzauer, Erik, 2003. "Experiences in mid-term planning of district heating systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 28(15), pages 1545-1555.
    17. Jiang, Yuzhou & Sioshansi, Ramteen, 2024. "A computationally efficient approach to optimizing offers in centrally committed electricity markets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 25-42.
    18. Claude Lemaréchal, 2007. "The omnipresence of Lagrange," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 9-27, September.
    19. Yau, Sheena & Kwon, Roy H. & Scott Rogers, J. & Wu, Desheng, 2011. "Financial and operational decisions in the electricity sector: Contract portfolio optimization with the conditional value-at-risk criterion," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(1), pages 67-77, November.
    20. Briest, Gordon & Lauven, Lars-Peter & Kupfer, Stefan & Lukas, Elmar, 2022. "Leaving well-worn paths: Reversal of the investment-uncertainty relationship and flexible biogas plant operation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 1162-1176.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:28:y:1998:i:1:p:53-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.