IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v36y2024i5p1225-1241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving Bilevel Programs Based on Lower-Level Mond-Weir Duality

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Wei Li

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Gui-Hua Lin

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Xide Zhu

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

Abstract

This paper focuses on developing effective algorithms for solving a bilevel program. The most popular approach is to replace the lower-level problem with its Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions to generate a mathematical program with complementarity constraints (MPCC). However, MPCC does not satisfy the Mangasarian-Fromovitz constraint qualification (MFCQ) at any feasible point. In this paper, inspired by a recent work using the lower-level Wolfe duality (WDP), we apply the lower-level Mond-Weir duality to present a new reformulation, called MDP, for bilevel program. It is shown that, under mild assumptions, they are equivalent in globally or locally optimal sense. An example is given to show that, different from MPCC, MDP may satisfy the MFCQ at its feasible points. Relations among MDP, WDP, and MPCC are investigated. On this basis, we extend the MDP reformulation to present another new reformulation (called eMDP), which has similar properties to MDP. Furthermore, to compare two new reformulations with the MPCC and WDP approaches, we design a procedure to generate 150 tested problems randomly and comprehensive numerical experiments show that MDP has quite evident advantages over MPCC and WDP in terms of feasibility to the original bilevel programs, success efficiency, and average CPU time, whereas eMDP is far superior to all other three reformulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Wei Li & Gui-Hua Lin & Xide Zhu, 2024. "Solving Bilevel Programs Based on Lower-Level Mond-Weir Duality," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1225-1241, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:36:y:2024:i:5:p:1225-1241
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2023.0108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0108
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Izmailov & A. Pogosyan & M. Solodov, 2012. "Semismooth Newton method for the lifted reformulation of mathematical programs with complementarity constraints," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 199-221, January.
    2. Lei Guo & Gui-Hua Lin & Jane J. Ye, 2015. "Solving Mathematical Programs with Equilibrium Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 166(1), pages 234-256, July.
    3. Geunyeong Byeon & Pascal Van Hentenryck, 2022. "Benders Subproblem Decomposition for Bilevel Problems with Convex Follower," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1749-1767, May.
    4. Mengwei Xu & Jane Ye, 2014. "A smoothing augmented Lagrangian method for solving simple bilevel programs," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 59(1), pages 353-377, October.
    5. Jerome Bracken & James T. McGill, 1973. "Mathematical Programs with Optimization Problems in the Constraints," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(1), pages 37-44, February.
    6. G. H. Lin & M. Fukushima, 2006. "Hybrid Approach with Active Set Identification for Mathematical Programs with Complementarity Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 128(1), pages 1-28, January.
    7. Bo Zeng, 2020. "A Practical Scheme to Compute the Pessimistic Bilevel Optimization Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1128-1142, October.
    8. Benoît Colson & Patrice Marcotte & Gilles Savard, 2007. "An overview of bilevel optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 235-256, September.
    9. Alberto Caprara & Margarida Carvalho & Andrea Lodi & Gerhard J. Woeginger, 2016. "Bilevel Knapsack with Interdiction Constraints," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 319-333, May.
    10. Thomas Kleinert & Martin Schmidt, 2021. "Computing Feasible Points of Bilevel Problems with a Penalty Alternating Direction Method," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 198-215, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beck, Yasmine & Ljubić, Ivana & Schmidt, Martin, 2023. "A survey on bilevel optimization under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(2), pages 401-426.
    2. Gaoxi Li & Zhongping Wan, 2018. "On Bilevel Programs with a Convex Lower-Level Problem Violating Slater’s Constraint Qualification," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 820-837, December.
    3. Tamás Kis & András Kovács & Csaba Mészáros, 2021. "On Optimistic and Pessimistic Bilevel Optimization Models for Demand Response Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-22, April.
    4. R. Paulavičius & C. S. Adjiman, 2020. "New bounding schemes and algorithmic options for the Branch-and-Sandwich algorithm," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 77(2), pages 197-225, June.
    5. Lei Fang & Hecheng Li, 2013. "Lower bound of cost efficiency measure in DEA with incomplete price information," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 219-226, October.
    6. Rebeca Ramirez Acosta & Chathura Wanigasekara & Emilie Frost & Tobias Brandt & Sebastian Lehnhoff & Christof Büskens, 2023. "Integration of Intelligent Neighbourhood Grids to the German Distribution Grid: A Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Bo Zeng, 2020. "A Practical Scheme to Compute the Pessimistic Bilevel Optimization Problem," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1128-1142, October.
    8. Gabriel Lopez Zenarosa & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Eduardo L. Pasiliao, 2021. "On exact solution approaches for bilevel quadratic 0–1 knapsack problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 298(1), pages 555-572, March.
    9. Thomas Kleinert & Martine Labbé & Fr¨ank Plein & Martin Schmidt, 2020. "Technical Note—There’s No Free Lunch: On the Hardness of Choosing a Correct Big-M in Bilevel Optimization," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1716-1721, November.
    10. Carlos Henggeler Antunes & Maria João Alves & Billur Ecer, 2020. "Bilevel optimization to deal with demand response in power grids: models, methods and challenges," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 814-842, October.
    11. Allan Peñafiel Mera & Chandra Balijepalli, 2020. "Towards improving resilience of cities: an optimisation approach to minimising vulnerability to disruption due to natural disasters under budgetary constraints," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(4), pages 1809-1842, August.
    12. Ashenafi Woldemariam & Semu Kassa, 2015. "Systematic evolutionary algorithm for general multilevel Stackelberg problems with bounded decision variables (SEAMSP)," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 229(1), pages 771-790, June.
    13. Qingna Li & Zhen Li & Alain Zemkoho, 2022. "Bilevel hyperparameter optimization for support vector classification: theoretical analysis and a solution method," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 96(3), pages 315-350, December.
    14. Massol, Olivier & Tchung-Ming, Stéphane & Banal-Estañol, Albert, 2015. "Joining the CCS club! The economics of CO2 pipeline projects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 259-275.
    15. Xide Zhu & Peijun Guo, 2017. "Approaches to four types of bilevel programming problems with nonconvex nonsmooth lower level programs and their applications to newsvendor problems," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 86(2), pages 255-275, October.
    16. Lorenzo Lampariello & Simone Sagratella, 2017. "A Bridge Between Bilevel Programs and Nash Games," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 174(2), pages 613-635, August.
    17. Mofidi, Seyed Shahab & Pazour, Jennifer A., 2019. "When is it beneficial to provide freelance suppliers with choice? A hierarchical approach for peer-to-peer logistics platforms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1-23.
    18. Christine Tawfik & Sabine Limbourg, 2018. "Pricing Problems in Intermodal Freight Transport: Research Overview and Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    19. M. Hosein Zare & Oleg A. Prokopyev & Denis Sauré, 2020. "On Bilevel Optimization with Inexact Follower," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 17(1), pages 74-95, March.
    20. Yogendra Pandey & S. K. Mishra, 2018. "Optimality conditions and duality for semi-infinite mathematical programming problems with equilibrium constraints, using convexificators," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 269(1), pages 549-564, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:36:y:2024:i:5:p:1225-1241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.