IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v36y2024i5p1225-1241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solving Bilevel Programs Based on Lower-Level Mond-Weir Duality

Author

Listed:
  • Yu-Wei Li

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Gui-Hua Lin

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

  • Xide Zhu

    (School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)

Abstract

This paper focuses on developing effective algorithms for solving a bilevel program. The most popular approach is to replace the lower-level problem with its Karush-Kuhn-Tucker conditions to generate a mathematical program with complementarity constraints (MPCC). However, MPCC does not satisfy the Mangasarian-Fromovitz constraint qualification (MFCQ) at any feasible point. In this paper, inspired by a recent work using the lower-level Wolfe duality (WDP), we apply the lower-level Mond-Weir duality to present a new reformulation, called MDP, for bilevel program. It is shown that, under mild assumptions, they are equivalent in globally or locally optimal sense. An example is given to show that, different from MPCC, MDP may satisfy the MFCQ at its feasible points. Relations among MDP, WDP, and MPCC are investigated. On this basis, we extend the MDP reformulation to present another new reformulation (called eMDP), which has similar properties to MDP. Furthermore, to compare two new reformulations with the MPCC and WDP approaches, we design a procedure to generate 150 tested problems randomly and comprehensive numerical experiments show that MDP has quite evident advantages over MPCC and WDP in terms of feasibility to the original bilevel programs, success efficiency, and average CPU time, whereas eMDP is far superior to all other three reformulations.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu-Wei Li & Gui-Hua Lin & Xide Zhu, 2024. "Solving Bilevel Programs Based on Lower-Level Mond-Weir Duality," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1225-1241, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:36:y:2024:i:5:p:1225-1241
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2023.0108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0108
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2023.0108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:36:y:2024:i:5:p:1225-1241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.