IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v35y2023i4p886-908.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimized Scenario Reduction: Solving Large-Scale Stochastic Programs with Quality Guarantees

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Zhang

    (School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China)

  • Kai Wang

    (School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Alexandre Jacquillat

    (Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142)

  • Shuaian Wang

    (Department of Logistics and Maritime Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China)

Abstract

Stochastic programming involves large-scale optimization with exponentially many scenarios. This paper proposes an optimization-based scenario reduction approach to generate high-quality solutions and tight lower bounds by only solving small-scale instances, with a limited number of scenarios. First, we formulate a scenario subset selection model that optimizes the recourse approximation over a pool of solutions. We provide a theoretical justification of our formulation, and a tailored heuristic to solve it. Second, we propose a scenario assortment optimization approach to compute a lower bound—hence, an optimality gap—by relaxing nonanticipativity constraints across scenario “bundles.” To solve it, we design a new column-evaluation-and-generation algorithm, which provides a generalizable method for optimization problems featuring many decision variables and hard-to-estimate objective parameters. We test our approach on stochastic programs with continuous and mixed-integer recourse. Results show that (i) our scenario reduction method dominates scenario reduction benchmarks, (ii) our scenario assortment optimization, combined with column-evaluation-and-generation, yields tight lower bounds, and (iii) our overall approach results in stronger solutions, tighter lower bounds, and faster computational times than state-of-the-art stochastic programming algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Zhang & Kai Wang & Alexandre Jacquillat & Shuaian Wang, 2023. "Optimized Scenario Reduction: Solving Large-Scale Stochastic Programs with Quality Guarantees," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 886-908, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:35:y:2023:i:4:p:886-908
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2023.1295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2023.1295
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2023.1295?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bart P. G. Van Parys & Peyman Mohajerin Esfahani & Daniel Kuhn, 2021. "From Data to Decisions: Distributionally Robust Optimization Is Optimal," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 3387-3402, June.
    2. Liping Zhou & Na Geng & Zhibin Jiang & Shan Jiang, 2022. "Integrated Multiresource Capacity Planning and Multitype Patient Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 129-149, January.
    3. Jangho Park & Rebecca Stockbridge & Güzin Bayraksan, 2021. "Variance reduction for sequential sampling in stochastic programming," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 300(1), pages 171-204, May.
    4. Daniel Ralph & Huifu Xu, 2011. "Convergence of Stationary Points of Sample Average Two-Stage Stochastic Programs: A Generalized Equation Approach," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(3), pages 568-592, August.
    5. Julia L. Higle, 1998. "Variance Reduction and Objective Function Evaluation in Stochastic Linear Programs," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 10(2), pages 236-247, May.
    6. T. L. Magnanti & R. T. Wong, 1981. "Accelerating Benders Decomposition: Algorithmic Enhancement and Model Selection Criteria," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 464-484, June.
    7. Vit Prochazka & Stein W. Wallace, 2020. "Scenario tree construction driven by heuristic solutions of the optimization problem," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 277-307, June.
    8. Hanif Sherali & Brian Lunday, 2013. "On generating maximal nondominated Benders cuts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 57-72, November.
    9. Ahmed Khassiba & Fabian Bastin & Sonia Cafieri & Bernard Gendron & Marcel Mongeau, 2020. "Two-Stage Stochastic Mixed-Integer Programming with Chance Constraints for Extended Aircraft Arrival Management," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 54(4), pages 897-919, July.
    10. Marco E. Lübbecke & Jacques Desrosiers, 2005. "Selected Topics in Column Generation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 53(6), pages 1007-1023, December.
    11. Jamie Fairbrother & Amanda Turner & Stein W. Wallace, 2018. "Scenario Generation for Single-Period Portfolio Selection Problems with Tail Risk Measures: Coping with High Dimensions and Integer Variables," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 472-491, August.
    12. Michael S. Casey & Suvrajeet Sen, 2005. "The Scenario Generation Algorithm for Multistage Stochastic Linear Programming," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 615-631, August.
    13. R. T. Rockafellar & Roger J.-B. Wets, 1991. "Scenarios and Policy Aggregation in Optimization Under Uncertainty," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 119-147, February.
    14. Vit Prochazka & Stein W. Wallace, 2018. "Stochastic programs with binary distributions: structural properties of scenario trees and algorithms," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 397-410, October.
    15. Panos Parpas & Berk Ustun & Mort Webster & Quang Kha Tran, 2015. "Importance Sampling in Stochastic Programming: A Markov Chain Monte Carlo Approach," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 358-377, May.
    16. Soovin Yoon & Laura A. Albert & Veronica M. White, 2021. "A Stochastic Programming Approach for Locating and Dispatching Two Types of Ambulances," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 275-296, March.
    17. Schütz, Peter & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Ahmed, Shabbir, 2009. "Supply chain design under uncertainty using sample average approximation and dual decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(2), pages 409-419, December.
    18. Dimitris Bertsimas & Nathan Kallus, 2020. "From Predictive to Prescriptive Analytics," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(3), pages 1025-1044, March.
    19. Ronald Hochreiter & Georg Pflug, 2007. "Financial scenario generation for stochastic multi-stage decision processes as facility location problems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 257-272, July.
    20. Kevin Ryan & Shabbir Ahmed & Santanu S. Dey & Deepak Rajan & Amelia Musselman & Jean-Paul Watson, 2020. "Optimization-Driven Scenario Grouping," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 805-821, July.
    21. Cheng Guo & Merve Bodur & Dionne M. Aleman & David R. Urbach, 2021. "Logic-Based Benders Decomposition and Binary Decision Diagram Based Approaches for Stochastic Distributed Operating Room Scheduling," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1551-1569, October.
    22. Kjetil Høyland & Stein W. Wallace, 2001. "Generating Scenario Trees for Multistage Decision Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 295-307, February.
    23. Yossiri Adulyasak & Jean-François Cordeau & Raf Jans, 2015. "Benders Decomposition for Production Routing Under Demand Uncertainty," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(4), pages 851-867, August.
    24. R. Baldacci & E. Hadjiconstantinou & A. Mingozzi, 2004. "An Exact Algorithm for the Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem Based on a Two-Commodity Network Flow Formulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 52(5), pages 723-738, October.
    25. Yonghan Feng & Sarah Ryan, 2016. "Solution sensitivity-based scenario reduction for stochastic unit commitment," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 29-62, January.
    26. Sun, M. & Teng, F. & Konstantelos, I. & Strbac, G., 2018. "An objective-based scenario selection method for transmission network expansion planning with multivariate stochasticity in load and renewable energy sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 871-885.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jia, Rui & Du, Kun & Song, Zhigang & Xu, Wei & Zheng, Feifei, 2024. "Scenario reduction-based simulation method for efficient serviceability assessment of earthquake-damaged water distribution systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    2. Chen, Shuiwang & Wu, Lingxiao & Ng, Kam K.H. & Liu, Wei & Wang, Kun, 2024. "How airports enhance the environmental sustainability of operations: A critical review from the perspective of Operations Research," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Hu, Qiaolin & Gu, Weihua & Wu, Lingxiao & Zhang, Le, 2024. "Optimal autonomous truck platooning with detours, nonlinear costs, and a platoon size constraint," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simon Thevenin & Yossiri Adulyasak & Jean-François Cordeau, 2022. "Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming for Multiechelon Lot Sizing with Component Substitution," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3151-3169, November.
    2. Ragheb Rahmaniani & Shabbir Ahmed & Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Michel Gendreau & Walter Rei, 2020. "The Benders Dual Decomposition Method," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 878-895, May.
    3. Julien Keutchayan & Janosch Ortmann & Walter Rei, 2023. "Problem-driven scenario clustering in stochastic optimization," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 1-33, December.
    4. D. Kuhn, 2009. "Convergent Bounds for Stochastic Programs with Expected Value Constraints," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 597-618, June.
    5. Gruson, Matthieu & Cordeau, Jean-François & Jans, Raf, 2021. "Benders decomposition for a stochastic three-level lot sizing and replenishment problem with a distribution structure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(1), pages 206-217.
    6. Rahmaniani, Ragheb & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Gendreau, Michel & Rei, Walter, 2017. "The Benders decomposition algorithm: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 801-817.
    7. Sushil R. Poudel & Md Abdul Quddus & Mohammad Marufuzzaman & Linkan Bian & Reuben F. Burch V, 2019. "Managing congestion in a multi-modal transportation network under biomass supply uncertainty," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 739-781, February.
    8. Nathan Sudermann‐Merx & Steffen Rebennack & Christian Timpe, 2021. "Crossing Minimal Edge‐Constrained Layout Planning using Benders Decomposition," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(10), pages 3429-3447, October.
    9. N. Beheshti Asl & S. A. MirHassani, 2019. "Accelerating benders decomposition: multiple cuts via multiple solutions," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 37(3), pages 806-826, April.
    10. Poudel, Sushil Raj & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Bian, Linkan, 2016. "A hybrid decomposition algorithm for designing a multi-modal transportation network under biomass supply uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1-25.
    11. Kabli, Mohannad & Quddus, Md Abdul & Nurre, Sarah G. & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Usher, John M., 2020. "A stochastic programming approach for electric vehicle charging station expansion plans," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    12. Keyvanshokooh, Esmaeil & Ryan, Sarah M. & Kabir, Elnaz, 2016. "Hybrid robust and stochastic optimization for closed-loop supply chain network design using accelerated Benders decomposition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 76-92.
    13. Ekblom, J. & Blomvall, J., 2020. "Importance sampling in stochastic optimization: An application to intertemporal portfolio choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(1), pages 106-119.
    14. Zhen, Lu & He, Xueting & Zhuge, Dan & Wang, Shuaian, 2024. "Primal decomposition for berth planning under uncertainty," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    15. Xie, Fei & Huang, Yongxi, 2018. "A multistage stochastic programming model for a multi-period strategic expansion of biofuel supply chain under evolving uncertainties," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 130-148.
    16. Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Mike Hewitt & Francesca Maggioni & Walter Rei, 2021. "Partial Benders Decomposition: General Methodology and Application to Stochastic Network Design," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 414-435, March.
    17. Aghalari, Amin & Nur, Farjana & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad, 2021. "Solving a stochastic inland waterway port management problem using a parallelized hybrid decomposition algorithm," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    18. Bakker, Hannah & Dunke, Fabian & Nickel, Stefan, 2020. "A structuring review on multi-stage optimization under uncertainty: Aligning concepts from theory and practice," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    19. Narum, Benjamin S. & Fairbrother, Jamie & Wallace, Stein W., 2024. "Problem-based scenario generation by decomposing output distributions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 154-166.
    20. Ogbe, Emmanuel & Li, Xiang, 2017. "A new cross decomposition method for stochastic mixed-integer linear programming," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 487-499.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:35:y:2023:i:4:p:886-908. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.