IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v34y2022i2p1191-1206.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recourse in Kidney Exchange Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Bart Smeulders

    (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven 5612 AE, Netherlands)

  • Valentin Bartier

    (G-SCOP, Grenoble INP Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble 38031, France)

  • Yves Crama

    (HEC Management School, University of Liège, Liege 4000, Belgium)

  • Frits C. R. Spieksma

    (Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven 5612 AE, Netherlands)

Abstract

We introduce the problem of selecting patient-donor pairs in a kidney exchange program to undergo a crossmatch test, and we model this selection problem as a two-stage stochastic integer programming problem. The optimal solutions of this new formulation yield a larger expected number of realized transplants than previous approaches based on internal recourse or subset recourse. We settle the computational complexity of the selection problem by showing that it remains NP-hard even for maximum cycle length equal to two. Furthermore, we investigate to what extent different algorithmic approaches, including one based on Benders decomposition, are able to solve instances of the model. We empirically investigate the computational efficiency of this approach by solving randomly generated instances and study the corresponding running times as a function of maximum cycle length, and of the presence of nondirected donors. Summary of Contribution: This paper deals with an important and very complex issue linked to the optimization of transplant matchings in kidney exchange programs, namely, the inherent uncertainty in the assessment of compatibility between donors and recipients of transplants. Although this issue has previously received some attention in the optimization literature, most attempts to date have focused on applying recourse to solutions selected within restricted spaces. The present paper explicitly formulates the maximization of the expected number of transplants as a two-stage stochastic integer programming problem. The formulation turns out to be computationally difficulty, both from a theoretical and from a numerical perspective. Different algorithmic approaches are proposed and tested experimentally for its solution. The quality of the kidney exchanges produced by these algorithms compares favorably with that of earlier models.

Suggested Citation

  • Bart Smeulders & Valentin Bartier & Yves Crama & Frits C. R. Spieksma, 2022. "Recourse in Kidney Exchange Programs," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 1191-1206, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:2:p:1191-1206
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2021.1099
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2021.1099
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2021.1099?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vicky Mak-Hau, 2017. "On the kidney exchange problem: cardinality constrained cycle and chain problems on directed graphs: a survey of integer programming approaches," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 35-59, January.
    2. Glorie, K.M., 2012. "Estimating the probability of positive crossmatch after negative virtual crossmatch," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2012-25, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    3. John P. Dickerson & Ariel D. Procaccia & Tuomas Sandholm, 2019. "Failure-Aware Kidney Exchange," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1768-1791, April.
    4. Rahmaniani, Ragheb & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Gendreau, Michel & Rei, Walter, 2017. "The Benders decomposition algorithm: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 801-817.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kratz, Jörgen, 2024. "Conflicting objectives in kidney exchange," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esmaeilbeigi, Rasul & Mak-Hau, Vicky & Yearwood, John & Nguyen, Vivian, 2022. "The multiphase course timetabling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 1098-1119.
    2. Özgün Elçi & John Hooker, 2022. "Stochastic Planning and Scheduling with Logic-Based Benders Decomposition," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2428-2442, September.
    3. Di, Zhen & Yang, Lixing & Shi, Jungang & Zhou, Housheng & Yang, Kai & Gao, Ziyou, 2022. "Joint optimization of carriage arrangement and flow control in a metro-based underground logistics system," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1-23.
    4. Schmid, Nico André & Limère, Veronique & Raa, Birger, 2021. "Mixed model assembly line feeding with discrete location assignments and variable station space," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    5. Aliakbari Sani, Sajad & Bahn, Olivier & Delage, Erick, 2022. "Affine decision rule approximation to address demand response uncertainty in smart Grids’ capacity planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 438-455.
    6. Maher, Stephen J., 2021. "Implementing the branch-and-cut approach for a general purpose Benders’ decomposition framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(2), pages 479-498.
    7. William B. Haskell & Wenjie Huang & Huifu Xu, 2018. "Preference Elicitation and Robust Optimization with Multi-Attribute Quasi-Concave Choice Functions," Papers 1805.06632, arXiv.org.
    8. Clavijo López, Christian & Crama, Yves & Pironet, Thierry & Semet, Frédéric, 2024. "Multi-period distribution networks with purchase commitment contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 556-572.
    9. Fei, Xin & Gülpınar, Nalân & Branke, Jürgen, 2019. "Efficient solution selection for two-stage stochastic programs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 277(3), pages 918-929.
    10. Wim van Ackooij & Welington de Oliveira & Yongjia Song, 2018. "Adaptive Partition-Based Level Decomposition Methods for Solving Two-Stage Stochastic Programs with Fixed Recourse," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 57-70, February.
    11. Wu, Raphael & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2020. "Integrating reliability and resilience to support the transition from passive distribution grids to islanding microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    12. Filippi, C. & Guastaroba, G. & Speranza, M.G., 2021. "On single-source capacitated facility location with cost and fairness objectives," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(3), pages 959-974.
    13. Camilo Ortiz-Astorquiza & Ivan Contreras & Gilbert Laporte, 2019. "An Exact Algorithm for Multilevel Uncapacitated Facility Location," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(4), pages 1085-1106, July.
    14. Péter Biró & Flip Klijn & Xenia Klimentova & Ana Viana, 2021. "Shapley-Scarf Housing Markets: Respecting Improvement, Integer Programming, and Kidney Exchange," Working Papers 1235, Barcelona School of Economics.
    15. Zhu, Xuedong & Son, Junbo & Zhang, Xi & Wu, Jianguo, 2023. "Constraint programming and logic-based Benders decomposition for the integrated process planning and scheduling problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    16. Zhouchun Huang & Qipeng P. Zheng & Andrew L. Liu, 2022. "A Nested Cross Decomposition Algorithm for Power System Capacity Expansion with Multiscale Uncertainties," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1919-1939, July.
    17. Yang, Yongjian & Yin, Yunqiang & Wang, Dujuan & Ignatius, Joshua & Cheng, T.C.E. & Dhamotharan, Lalitha, 2023. "Distributionally robust multi-period location-allocation with multiple resources and capacity levels in humanitarian logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1042-1062.
    18. Moreno, Alfredo & Munari, Pedro & Alem, Douglas, 2019. "A branch-and-Benders-cut algorithm for the Crew Scheduling and Routing Problem in road restoration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(1), pages 16-34.
    19. Klimentova, Xenia & Biró, Péter & Viana, Ana & Costa, Virginia & Pedroso, João Pedro, 2023. "Novel integer programming models for the stable kidney exchange problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(3), pages 1391-1407.
    20. John P. Dickerson & Ariel D. Procaccia & Tuomas Sandholm, 2019. "Failure-Aware Kidney Exchange," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(4), pages 1768-1791, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:34:y:2022:i:2:p:1191-1206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.