IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v33y2021i4p1520-1532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Computing Sensitivities for Distortion Risk Measures

Author

Listed:
  • Peter W. Glynn

    (Department of Management Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Yijie Peng

    (Department of Management Science and Information Systems, Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)

  • Michael C. Fu

    (The Robert H. Smith School of Business, Institute for Systems Research, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742)

  • Jian-Qiang Hu

    (Department of Management Science, School of Management, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China)

Abstract

Distortion risk measure, defined by an integral of a distorted tail probability, has been widely used in behavioral economics and risk management as an alternative to expected utility. The sensitivity of the distortion risk measure is a functional of certain distribution sensitivities. We propose a new sensitivity estimator for the distortion risk measure that uses generalized likelihood ratio estimators for distribution sensitivities as input and establish a central limit theorem for the new estimator. The proposed estimator can handle discontinuous sample paths and distortion functions.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter W. Glynn & Yijie Peng & Michael C. Fu & Jian-Qiang Hu, 2021. "Computing Sensitivities for Distortion Risk Measures," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 1520-1532, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:33:y:2021:i:4:p:1520-1532
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2020.1016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2020.1016
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2020.1016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bernd Heidergott & Warren Volk-Makarewicz, 2016. "A Measure-Valued Differentiation Approach to Sensitivities of Quantiles," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 293-317, February.
    2. Yijie Peng & Michael C. Fu & Bernd Heidergott & Henry Lam, 2020. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Monte Carlo Simulation: Toward Data-Driven Stochastic Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1896-1912, November.
    3. Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
    4. L. Jeff Hong & Guangwu Liu, 2009. "Simulating Sensitivities of Conditional Value at Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 281-293, February.
    5. Daniel Kahneman & Amos Tversky, 2013. "Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Leonard C MacLean & William T Ziemba (ed.), HANDBOOK OF THE FUNDAMENTALS OF FINANCIAL DECISION MAKING Part I, chapter 6, pages 99-127, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    6. Rajan Suri & Michael A. Zazanis, 1988. "Perturbation Analysis Gives Strongly Consistent Sensitivity Estimates for the M/G/1 Queue," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 39-64, January.
    7. Guangwu Liu & Liu Jeff Hong, 2009. "Kernel estimation of quantile sensitivities," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(6), pages 511-525, September.
    8. Eunji Lim & Peter W. Glynn, 2012. "Consistency of Multidimensional Convex Regression," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(1), pages 196-208, February.
    9. Michael C. Fu & L. Jeff Hong & Jian-Qiang Hu, 2009. "Conditional Monte Carlo Estimation of Quantile Sensitivities," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(12), pages 2019-2027, December.
    10. David F. Muñoz & Peter W. Glynn, 2001. "Multivariate Standardized Time Series for Steady-State Simulation Output Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 413-422, June.
    11. Bloznelis, M. & Paulauskas, V., 1994. "A note on the central limit theorem for stochastically continuous processes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 351-361, October.
    12. Christian Gourieroux & Wei Liu, 2006. "Sensitivity Analysis of Distortion Risk Measures," Working Papers 2006-33, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
    13. Philippe Artzner & Freddy Delbaen & Jean‐Marc Eber & David Heath, 1999. "Coherent Measures of Risk," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 203-228, July.
    14. L. Jeff Hong, 2009. "Estimating Quantile Sensitivities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 118-130, February.
    15. Guangxin Jiang & Michael C. Fu, 2015. "Technical Note—On Estimating Quantile Sensitivities via Infinitesimal Perturbation Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 435-441, April.
    16. Yongqiang Wang & Michael C. Fu & Steven I. Marcus, 2012. "A New Stochastic Derivative Estimator for Discontinuous Payoff Functions with Application to Financial Derivatives," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 447-460, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yiting Fan & Rui Fang, 2022. "Some Results on Measures of Interaction among Risks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yijie Peng & Michael C. Fu & Bernd Heidergott & Henry Lam, 2020. "Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Monte Carlo Simulation: Toward Data-Driven Stochastic Modeling," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1896-1912, November.
    2. Jiaqiao Hu & Yijie Peng & Gongbo Zhang & Qi Zhang, 2022. "A Stochastic Approximation Method for Simulation-Based Quantile Optimization," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 2889-2907, November.
    3. Yijie Peng & Chun-Hung Chen & Michael C. Fu & Jian-Qiang Hu & Ilya O. Ryzhov, 2021. "Efficient Sampling Allocation Procedures for Optimal Quantile Selection," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 230-245, January.
    4. Guangxin Jiang & Michael C. Fu, 2015. "Technical Note—On Estimating Quantile Sensitivities via Infinitesimal Perturbation Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(2), pages 435-441, April.
    5. Bernd Heidergott & Warren Volk-Makarewicz, 2016. "A Measure-Valued Differentiation Approach to Sensitivities of Quantiles," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(1), pages 293-317, February.
    6. He, Zhijian, 2022. "Sensitivity estimation of conditional value at risk using randomized quasi-Monte Carlo," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 229-242.
    7. Zhaolin Hu & Dali Zhang, 2018. "Utility‐based shortfall risk: Efficient computations via Monte Carlo," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 65(5), pages 378-392, August.
    8. L. Jeff Hong & Sandeep Juneja & Jun Luo, 2014. "Estimating Sensitivities of Portfolio Credit Risk Using Monte Carlo," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 848-865, November.
    9. Zhenyu Cui & Michael C. Fu & Jian-Qiang Hu & Yanchu Liu & Yijie Peng & Lingjiong Zhu, 2020. "On the Variance of Single-Run Unbiased Stochastic Derivative Estimators," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 390-407, April.
    10. Yijie Peng & Li Xiao & Bernd Heidergott & L. Jeff Hong & Henry Lam, 2022. "A New Likelihood Ratio Method for Training Artificial Neural Networks," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 638-655, January.
    11. Makam, Vaishno Devi & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis with χ2-divergences," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 372-383.
    12. Pesenti, Silvana M. & Tsanakas, Andreas & Millossovich, Pietro, 2018. "Euler allocations in the presence of non-linear reinsurance: Comment on Major (2018)," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 29-31.
    13. Silvana M. Pesenti & Pietro Millossovich & Andreas Tsanakas, 2023. "Differential Quantile-Based Sensitivity in Discontinuous Models," Papers 2310.06151, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    14. Xi Chen & Kyoung-Kuk Kim, 2016. "Efficient VaR and CVaR Measurement via Stochastic Kriging," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(4), pages 629-644, November.
    15. Huang, Zhenzhen & Kwok, Yue Kuen & Xu, Ziqing, 2024. "Efficient algorithms for calculating risk measures and risk contributions in copula credit risk models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 132-150.
    16. Pesenti, Silvana M. & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2019. "Reverse sensitivity testing: What does it take to break the model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 654-670.
    17. Andreas Tsanakas & Pietro Millossovich, 2016. "Sensitivity Analysis Using Risk Measures," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(1), pages 30-48, January.
    18. L. Jeff Hong & Yi Yang & Liwei Zhang, 2011. "Sequential Convex Approximations to Joint Chance Constrained Programs: A Monte Carlo Approach," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 59(3), pages 617-630, June.
    19. Yongqiang Wang & Michael C. Fu & Steven I. Marcus, 2012. "A New Stochastic Derivative Estimator for Discontinuous Payoff Functions with Application to Financial Derivatives," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 447-460, April.
    20. Isadora Antoniano‐Villalobos & Emanuele Borgonovo & Sumeda Siriwardena, 2018. "Which Parameters Are Important? Differential Importance Under Uncertainty," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(11), pages 2459-2477, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:33:y:2021:i:4:p:1520-1532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.