IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v33y2021i3p1037-1055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extreme Ray Feasibility Cuts for Unit Commitment with Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Chao Li

    (Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281)

  • Muhong Zhang

    (Amazon.com Services Inc., Seattle, Washington 98109)

  • Kory Hedman

    (Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona 85281)

Abstract

The unit commitment problem with uncertainty is considered one of the most challenging power system scheduling problems. Different stochastic models have been proposed to solve the problem, but such approaches have yet to be applied in industry practice because of computational challenges. In practice, the problem is formulated as a deterministic model with reserve requirements to hedge against uncertainty. However, simply requiring a certain level of reserves cannot ensure power system reliability as the procured reserves may be nondispatchable because of transmission limitations. In this paper, we derive a set of feasibility cuts (constraints) for managing the unit commitment problem with uncertainty. These cuts eliminate unreliable scheduling solutions and reallocate reserves in the power system; they are induced by the extreme rays of a polyhedral dual cone. This paper shows that, with the proposed reformulation, the extreme rays of the dual cone can be characterized by combinatorial selections of transmission lines (arcs) and buses (nodes) of the power system. As a result, the cuts can then be characterized using engineering insights. The unit commitment problem with uncertainty is formulated as a deterministic model with the identified extreme ray feasibility cuts. Test results show that, with the proposed extreme ray feasibility cuts, the problem can be solved more efficiently, and the resulting scheduling decision is also more reliable.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao Li & Muhong Zhang & Kory Hedman, 2021. "Extreme Ray Feasibility Cuts for Unit Commitment with Uncertainty," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1037-1055, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:33:y:2021:i:3:p:1037-1055
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2020.0995
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2020.0995
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2020.0995?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jean-Paul Watson & David Woodruff, 2011. "Progressive hedging innovations for a class of stochastic mixed-integer resource allocation problems," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 8(4), pages 355-370, November.
    2. T. L. Magnanti & R. T. Wong, 1981. "Accelerating Benders Decomposition: Algorithmic Enhancement and Model Selection Criteria," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 464-484, June.
    3. Lewis Ntaimo, 2010. "Disjunctive Decomposition for Two-Stage Stochastic Mixed-Binary Programs with Random Recourse," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 58(1), pages 229-243, February.
    4. Anthony Papavasiliou & Shmuel S. Oren, 2013. "Multiarea Stochastic Unit Commitment for High Wind Penetration in a Transmission Constrained Network," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 578-592, June.
    5. Jiang, Ruiwei & Zhang, Muhong & Li, Guang & Guan, Yongpei, 2014. "Two-stage network constrained robust unit commitment problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 751-762.
    6. Walter Rei & Jean-François Cordeau & Michel Gendreau & Patrick Soriano, 2009. "Accelerating Benders Decomposition by Local Branching," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 333-345, May.
    7. Yongpei Guan & Shabbir Ahmed & George L. Nemhauser, 2009. "Cutting Planes for Multistage Stochastic Integer Programs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 57(2), pages 287-298, April.
    8. Dale McDaniel & Mike Devine, 1977. "A Modified Benders' Partitioning Algorithm for Mixed Integer Programming," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(3), pages 312-319, November.
    9. Cote, Gilles & Laughton, Michael A., 1984. "Large-scale mixed integer programming: Benders-type heuristics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 327-333, June.
    10. PAPAVASILIOU, Anthony & OREN, Schmuel S., 2013. "Multiarea stochastic unit commitment for high wind penetration in a transmission constrained network," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2500, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    11. Qipeng Zheng & Jianhui Wang & Panos Pardalos & Yongpei Guan, 2013. "A decomposition approach to the two-stage stochastic unit commitment problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 387-410, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kai Pan & Ming Zhao & Chung-Lun Li & Feng Qiu, 2022. "A Polyhedral Study on Fuel-Constrained Unit Commitment," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(6), pages 3309-3324, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qipeng Zheng & Jianhui Wang & Panos Pardalos & Yongpei Guan, 2013. "A decomposition approach to the two-stage stochastic unit commitment problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 387-410, November.
    2. Kai Pan & Yongpei Guan, 2022. "Integrated Stochastic Optimal Self-Scheduling for Two-Settlement Electricity Markets," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1819-1840, May.
    3. Munoz, F.D. & Hobbs, B.F. & Watson, J.-P., 2016. "New bounding and decomposition approaches for MILP investment problems: Multi-area transmission and generation planning under policy constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 888-898.
    4. M. Jenabi & S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi & S. A. Torabi & Moeen Sammak Jalali, 2022. "An accelerated Benders decomposition algorithm for stochastic power system expansion planning using sample average approximation," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 59(4), pages 1304-1336, December.
    5. Azad, Nader & Hassini, Elkafi, 2019. "Recovery strategies from major supply disruptions in single and multiple sourcing networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 481-501.
    6. Rahmaniani, Ragheb & Crainic, Teodor Gabriel & Gendreau, Michel & Rei, Walter, 2017. "The Benders decomposition algorithm: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 801-817.
    7. Lixin Tang & Wei Jiang & Georgios Saharidis, 2013. "An improved Benders decomposition algorithm for the logistics facility location problem with capacity expansions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 165-190, November.
    8. Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Mike Hewitt & Francesca Maggioni & Walter Rei, 2021. "Partial Benders Decomposition: General Methodology and Application to Stochastic Network Design," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(2), pages 414-435, March.
    9. M. Jenabi & S. Fatemi Ghomi & S. Torabi & S. Hosseinian, 2015. "Acceleration strategies of Benders decomposition for the security constraints power system expansion planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 235(1), pages 337-369, December.
    10. Yonghan Feng & Sarah Ryan, 2016. "Solution sensitivity-based scenario reduction for stochastic unit commitment," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 29-62, January.
    11. Joe Naoum-Sawaya & Samir Elhedhli, 2013. "An interior-point Benders based branch-and-cut algorithm for mixed integer programs," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 33-55, November.
    12. Hanif Sherali & Ki-Hwan Bae & Mohamed Haouari, 2013. "A benders decomposition approach for an integrated airline schedule design and fleet assignment problem with flight retiming, schedule balance, and demand recapture," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 213-244, November.
    13. Hanif Sherali & Brian Lunday, 2013. "On generating maximal nondominated Benders cuts," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 210(1), pages 57-72, November.
    14. de Sá, Elisangela Martins & de Camargo, Ricardo Saraiva & de Miranda, Gilberto, 2013. "An improved Benders decomposition algorithm for the tree of hubs location problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(2), pages 185-202.
    15. Jianqiu Huang & Kai Pan & Yongpei Guan, 2021. "Multistage Stochastic Power Generation Scheduling Co-Optimizing Energy and Ancillary Services," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 352-369, January.
    16. Schulze, Tim & Grothey, Andreas & McKinnon, Ken, 2017. "A stabilised scenario decomposition algorithm applied to stochastic unit commitment problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 247-259.
    17. Elisangela Martins de Sá & Ivan Contreras & Jean-François Cordeau & Ricardo Saraiva de Camargo & Gilberto de Miranda, 2015. "The Hub Line Location Problem," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 500-518, August.
    18. Lim, Gino J. & Bard, Jonathan F., 2016. "Benders decomposition and an IP-based heuristic for selecting IMRT treatment beam anglesAuthor-Name: Lin, Sifeng," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 715-726.
    19. Skolfield, J. Kyle & Escobedo, Adolfo R., 2022. "Operations research in optimal power flow: A guide to recent and emerging methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 387-404.
    20. Ragheb Rahmaniani & Shabbir Ahmed & Teodor Gabriel Crainic & Michel Gendreau & Walter Rei, 2020. "The Benders Dual Decomposition Method," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 878-895, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:33:y:2021:i:3:p:1037-1055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.