IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jepr00/v7y2018i3p52-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Enzo Falco

    (Department OTB Research for the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands)

  • Reinout Kleinhans

    (Department OTB Research for the Built Environment, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands)

Abstract

A renewed interest has appeared in citizen co-production of public services due to financial pressure on governments. While social media are considered an important facilitator, many digital participatory platforms (DPPs) have been developed to facilitate co-production between citizens and governments in the context of urban development. Previous studies have delivered a fragmented overview of DPPs in a few socio-spatial contexts and failed to take stock of the rise of DPPs. This article aims to provide a more comprehensive picture of the availability and functionalities of DPPs. Through a systematic review, 113 active DPPs have been identified, analysed, and classified within a citizen-government relationship typology. Almost a quarter of these DPPs demonstrate a realistic potential for online and offline co-production between governments and citizens. The article critically analyses the characteristics of these DPPs and explores their real-world applications in urban development. The article concludes with directions for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Enzo Falco & Reinout Kleinhans, 2018. "Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 7(3), pages 52-79, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jepr00:v:7:y:2018:i:3:p:52-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJEPR.2018070105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Phil Jones & Antonia Layard & Chris Speed & Colin Lorne, 2015. "MapLocal: Use of Smartphones for Crowdsourced Planning," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 322-336, June.
    2. Michael J. Magro, 2012. "A Review of Social Media Use in E-Government," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Reinout Kleinhans & Maarten Van Ham & Jennifer Evans-Cowley, 2015. "Using Social Media and Mobile Technologies to Foster Engagement and Self-Organization in Participatory Urban Planning and Neighbourhood Governance," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 237-247, June.
    4. Nader Afzalan & Jennifer Evans-Cowley, 2015. "Planning and Social Media: Facebook for Planning at the Neighbourhood Scale," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(3), pages 270-285, June.
    5. David Adams, 2013. "Volunteered Geographic Information: Potential Implications for Participatory Planning," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 464-469, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mohamed Sapraz & Shengnan Han, 2021. "Implicating Human Values for designing a Digital Government Collaborative Platform for Environmental Issues: A Value Sensitive Design Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Daphna Levine & Shai Sussman & Meirav Aharon-Gutman, 2022. "Spatial-temporal patterns of self-organization: A dynamic 4D model for redeveloping the post-zoning city," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(3), pages 1005-1023, March.
    3. Yanliu Lin & Kasper Benneker, 2022. "Assessing collaborative planning and the added value of planning support apps in The Netherlands," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(2), pages 391-410, February.
    4. Vít Pászto & Jiří Pánek & Jaroslav Burian, 2021. "Geodatabase of Publicly Available Information about Czech Municipalities’ Local Administration," Data, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-13, August.
    5. Christmann, Gabriela & Schinagl, Martin, 2023. "Digitalisation in everyday urban planning activities: Consequences for embodied practices, spatial knowledge, planning processes, and workplaces," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(2), pages 141-150.
    6. Ha, Seungyeon & Park, Yujun & Kim, Jongpyo & Kim, Seongcheol, 2023. "Research trends of digital platforms: A survey of the literature from 2018 to 2021," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Willemien Laenens & Wendy Van den Broeck & Ilse Mariën, 2018. "Channel Choice Determinants of (Digital) Government Communication: A Case Study of Spatial Planning in Flanders," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 140-152.
    2. Xiaoxu Liang & Yanjun Lu & John Martin, 2021. "A Review of the Role of Social Media for the Cultural Heritage Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Pusp Raj Joshi & Shareeful Islam & Syed Islam, 2017. "A Framework for Cloud Based E-Government from the Perspective of Developing Countries," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-26, November.
    4. Erik Glaas & Mattias Hjerpe & Martin Karlson & Tina-Simone Neset, 2020. "Visualization for Citizen Participation: User Perceptions on a Mainstreamed Online Participatory Tool and Its Usefulness for Climate Change Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-16, January.
    5. Alaa Bakur, 2017. "Hearing Foreigners’ Voices: Unprecedented Communication for Hearing Foreigners’ Voices in Saudi Arabia," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(12), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Rizwan Muhammad & Yaolong Zhao & Fan Liu, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Analysis to Observe Gender Based Check-In Behavior by Using Social Media Big Data: A Case Study of Guangzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-30, May.
    7. Špaček David, 2018. "Social Media Use in Public Administration: The Case of Facebook Use by Czech Regions," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 11(2), pages 199-218, December.
    8. Supunmali Ahangama, 2023. "Relating Social Media Diffusion, Education Level and Cybersecurity Protection Mechanisms to E-Participation Initiatives: Insights from a Cross-Country Analysis," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1695-1711, October.
    9. Maria Hellman & Eva-Karin Olsson & Charlotte Wagnsson, 2016. "EU Armed Forces’ Use of Social Media in Areas of Deployment," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 51-62.
    10. Maria Hellman & Eva-Karin Olsson & Charlotte Wagnsson, 2016. "EU Armed Forces’ Use of Social Media in Areas of Deployment," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 4(1), pages 51-62.
    11. Quan Li & Wenbo Wei & Nian Xiong & Daici Feng & Xinyue Ye & Yongsheng Jiang, 2017. "Social Media Research, Human Behavior, and Sustainable Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-11, March.
    12. Fabiana Zollo & Petra Kralj Novak & Michela Del Vicario & Alessandro Bessi & Igor Mozetič & Antonio Scala & Guido Caldarelli & Walter Quattrociocchi, 2015. "Emotional Dynamics in the Age of Misinformation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Andrew Osehi Enaifoghe & Cotties Toyin Adetiba, 2019. "Understanding Dynamic Engagement of Community in Local Governance, Enhancing Grassroots Development in South Africa," Journal of Social and Development Sciences, AMH International, vol. 10(1), pages 22-32.
    14. Katherine E. Laycock & Wayne Caldwell, 2018. "Exploring Community Cohesion in Rural Canada Post-Extreme Weather: Planning Ahead for Unknown Stresses," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 77-97, August.
    15. Todisco, Lucio & Tomo, Andrea & Canonico, Paolo & Mangia, Gianluigi & Sarnacchiaro, Pasquale, 2021. "Exploring social media usage in the public sector: Public employees' perceptions of ICT's usefulness in delivering value added," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    16. Karol Król & Dariusz Zdonek, 2020. "Local Government Website Accessibility—Evidence from Poland," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, March.
    17. Nader Afzalan & Thomas Sanchez, 2017. "Testing the Use of Crowdsourced Information: Case Study of Bike-Share Infrastructure Planning in Cincinnati, Ohio," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 2(3), pages 33-44.
    18. Matthew Tenney & Renee Sieber, 2016. "Data-Driven Participation: Algorithms, Cities, Citizens, and Corporate Control," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 101-113.
    19. Soud K. Al-Thani & Cynthia P. Skelhorn & Alexandre Amato & Muammer Koc & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi, 2018. "Smart Technology Impact on Neighborhood Form for a Sustainable Doha," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    20. Suthee Sangiambut & Renee Sieber, 2016. "The V in VGI: Citizens or Civic Data Sources," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 141-154.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jepr00:v:7:y:2018:i:3:p:52-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.