IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/urbpla/v1y2016i2p32-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Leveraging VGI Integrated with 3D Spatial Technology to Support Urban Intensification in Melbourne, Australia

Author

Listed:
  • Soheil Sabri

    (Centre for SDIs and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Australia)

  • Abbas Rajabifard

    (Centre for SDIs and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Australia)

  • Serene Ho

    (Centre for SDIs and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Australia)

  • Sam Amirebrahimi

    (Centre for SDIs and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Australia)

  • Ian Bishop

    (Centre for SDIs and Land Administration, Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Australia)

Abstract

High density residential development in metropolitan Melbourne, where contradictory imperatives of neighbourhood character and urban intensification play important roles, remains an uncertain practice. One key issue for plan implementation is the lack of consistency between authorities, developers and the community in interpreting the standards, design guidelines, and state/local strategies, especially those relating to neighbourhood character. There is currently no mechanism to incorporate community perceptions and place experiences as subjective aspects of neighbourhood character in development assessments. There is also little use of micro-scale and multi-dimensional spatial analysis to integrate these subjective aspects with objective measures (e.g. building volume and height; streetscape) to communicate effectively—and in a limited timeframe—with all stakeholders. This paper explores the potential of two emerging geospatial technologies that can be leveraged to respond to these problems. Evidence in the literature suggests that volunteered geographic information (VGI) can provide community input around subjective aspects of the urban environment. In addition, a deluge of three-dimensional (3D) spatial information (e.g. 3D city models) is increasingly available for micro-level (building- or property-level) assessment of the physical aspects of the urban environment. This paper formulates and discusses a conceptual framework to link these two spatial technological advancements in a virtual geographic environment (VGE) that accounts for micro-scale 3D spatial analysis incorporating both subjective and objective aspects of neighbourhood character relevant in implementing compact city strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Soheil Sabri & Abbas Rajabifard & Serene Ho & Sam Amirebrahimi & Ian Bishop, 2016. "Leveraging VGI Integrated with 3D Spatial Technology to Support Urban Intensification in Melbourne, Australia," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 32-48.
  • Handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:32-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/623
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Adams, 2013. "Volunteered Geographic Information: Potential Implications for Participatory Planning," Planning Practice & Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(4), pages 464-469, August.
    2. Gethin Davison & Emma Rowden, 2012. "“There's Something about Subi”: Defending and Creating Neighbourhood Character in Perth, Australia," Journal of Urban Design, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 189-212.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suthee Sangiambut & Renee Sieber, 2016. "The V in VGI: Citizens or Civic Data Sources," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(2), pages 141-154.
    2. Enzo Falco & Reinout Kleinhans, 2018. "Digital Participatory Platforms for Co-Production in Urban Development: A Systematic Review," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 7(3), pages 52-79, July.
    3. Abu Yousuf Swapan & Joo Hwa Bay & Dora Marinova, 2018. "Built Form and Community Building in Residential Neighbourhoods: A Case Study of Physical Distance in Subiaco, Western Australia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:urbpla:v:1:y:2016:i:2:p:32-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.