IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijetma/v6y2006i6p525-538.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A framework for making sense of sustainable innovation through stakeholder involvement

Author

Listed:
  • Marjolein C. Achterkamp
  • Janita F.J. Vos

Abstract

This article presents a framework that can serve as a first step towards managing stakeholder involvement in sustainable innovation projects. This framework is based on the questions of which stakeholders ought to be involved, in which phase of the innovation project, and how. The underlying idea is that stakeholder involvement serves two goals: to clarify the local criteria for sustainable outcomes, and to activate organisational practices according to these criteria. In the framework we combine a new perspective on sustainability, 'the reduction of offload', with the well-known Triple P-perspective, to designate certain types of stakeholders. These stakeholders should be consulted to clarify criteria for sustainable innovation. Active participation of organisational members in stakeholder involvement might lead to the commitment needed for the actual use of these criteria in different phases of the innovation process. In this way stakeholder involvement can also lead to organisational practices consistent with sustainability criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Marjolein C. Achterkamp & Janita F.J. Vos, 2006. "A framework for making sense of sustainable innovation through stakeholder involvement," International Journal of Environmental Technology and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(6), pages 525-538.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:6:y:2006:i:6:p:525-538
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=11895
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Oluyomi A. Osobajo & David Moore, 2017. "Who is Who? Identifying the Different Sub-groups of Secondary Stakeholders within a Community: A Case Study of the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria Communities," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 188-209, September.
    2. Stella Lippolis & Angelo Ruggieri & Rossella Leopizzi, 2023. "Open Innovation for sustainable transition: The case of Enel “Open Power”," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(7), pages 4202-4216, November.
    3. Barbara Marchetti & Francesco Corvaro & Fabio Polonara & Mariella Leporini, 2018. "Development of an Innovative and Sustainable Model for Integrating River Maintenance with Energy Production from Residual Biomass," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Jie Mi & Chuanpeng Yao & Xiaoyang Zhao & Fei Li, 2024. "Research on the Diffusion Mechanism of Green Technology Innovation Based on Enterprise Perception," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 63(5), pages 1981-2010, May.
    5. Chistov, Valery & Tanwar, Sunita & Yadav, C.S., 2021. "Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Addressing the Grand Challenges through Radical Change and Open Innovation," EcoEvoRxiv r5ebg, Center for Open Science.
    6. Peter Wehnert & Christoph Kollwitz & Christofer Daiberl & Barbara Dinter & Markus Beckmann, 2018. "Capturing the Bigger Picture? Applying Text Analytics to Foster Open Innovation Processes for Sustainability-Oriented Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    7. Aydan Ismayilova & Gilbert Silvius, 2021. "Cradle-to-Cradle in Project Management: A Case Study," International Journal of Circular Economy and Waste Management (IJCEWM), IGI Global, vol. 1(1), pages 54-80, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijetma:v:6:y:2006:i:6:p:525-538. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=11 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.