IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v7y2015i5p163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Control of Micronutrients Availability in Soil and Concentration in Rice Grain through Field Water Management

Author

Listed:
  • Juan Marques Fong
  • Tsugiyuki Masunaga
  • Kuniaki Sato

Abstract

A pot experiment was conducted under different water managements, namely control (continuous flooding condition), 2,3,4WAH (water was drained at two to four weeks after heading), and FCap (the soil moisture was kept at field capacity level, to maintain aerobic soil condition). We examined the influence of the establishment of aerobic soil condition at different timing of rice post-heading stage. The results showed that water managements changed soil redox potential and pH that were known to be responsible of micronutrients availability in soil. Transition from flooding condition to aerobic condition during rice post-anthesis stage, reduced pH toward its initial value as well as Fe availability in soil. Although soil was re-oxidized in 2,3,4WAH treatments, which reduced Fe availability in soil from the level of control treatment, concentration of Fe in grain did not differ between control and drained treatments. Correlation analyses exhibited that the reduction of Fe availability in soil under aerobic condition in 2,3,4WAH and FCap enhanced Zn and Cu availabilities in soil and increased concentration of Zn, Cu and Mn in grain. The results point up toward that, enhancement of micronutrient availability in soil during post-heading stage are strongly associated with its grain micronutrient concentration. Establishment of aerobic condition from two weeks after heading increased the grain Zn, Cu and Mn concentration by 11, 20 and 35 percent respectively over the values in flooding condition, without negative effects on yield parameters. Unlike control and 2,3,4WAH treatments, FCap that kept aerobic soil condition performed high concentration of grain micronutrients but its low yield.

Suggested Citation

  • Juan Marques Fong & Tsugiyuki Masunaga & Kuniaki Sato, 2015. "Control of Micronutrients Availability in Soil and Concentration in Rice Grain through Field Water Management," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(5), pages 163-163, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:7:y:2015:i:5:p:163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/45116/25588
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/45116
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Meenakshi, J.V. & Johnson, Nancy L. & Manyong, Victor M. & DeGroote, Hugo & Javelosa, Josyline & Yanggen, David R. & Naher, Firdousi & Gonzalez, Carolina & García, James & Meng, Erika, 2010. "How Cost-Effective is Biofortification in Combating Micronutrient Malnutrition? An Ex ante Assessment," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 64-75, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguema, Abigail & Norton, George W. & Fregene, Martin & Sayre, Richard & Manary, Mark, 2011. "Expected economic benefits of meeting nutritional needs through biofortified cassava in Nigeria and Kenya," African Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, African Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, March.
    2. Carolina González & Nancy Johnson & Matin Qaim, 2009. "Consumer Acceptance of Second‐Generation GM Foods: The Case of Biofortified Cassava in the North‐east of Brazil," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(3), pages 604-624, September.
    3. repec:ags:aaea22:335948 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Adewale Oparinde & Abhijit Banerji & Ekin Birol & Paul Ilona, 2016. "Information and consumer willingness to pay for biofortified yellow cassava: evidence from experimental auctions in Nigeria," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 47(2), pages 215-233, March.
    5. Mogues, Tewodaj & Yu, Bingxin & Fan, Shenggen & Mcbride, Linden, 2012. "The impacts of public investment in and for agriculture: Synthesis of the existing evidence," IFPRI discussion papers 1217, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Renkow, Mitch & Byerlee, Derek, 2010. "The impacts of CGIAR research: A review of recent evidence," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 391-402, October.
    7. Lentz, Erin C. & Barrett, Christopher B., 2013. "The economics and nutritional impacts of food assistance policies and programs," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 151-163.
    8. Gunaratna, Nilupa S. & De Groote, Hugo & McCabe, G.P., 2008. "Evaluating the Impact of Biofortification: A Meta-analysis of Community-level Studies on Quality Protein Maize (QPM)," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 44166, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Johnson, Nancy L. & Guedenet, Hannah & Saltzman, Amy, 2015. "What will it take for biofortification to have impact on the ground? Theories of change for three crop-country combinations:," IFPRI discussion papers 1427, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    10. Khor, L.Y. & Zeller, M., 2018. "Storing a staple crop for own consumption: Linkages to food security," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277244, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    11. Stefania Sellitti & Kate Vaiknoras & Melinda Smale & Nelissa Jamora & Robert Andrade & Peter Wenzl & Ricardo Labarta, 2020. "The contribution of the CIAT genebank to the development of iron-biofortified bean varieties and well-being of farm households in Rwanda," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(5), pages 975-991, October.
    12. Ecker, Olivier & Mabiso, Athur & Kennedy, Adam & Diao, Xinshen 22905, 2011. "Making agriculture pro-nutrition: Opportunities in Tanzania," IFPRI discussion papers 1124, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    13. Hoffmann, Vivian, 2009. "What You Don’t Know Can Hurt You: Micronutrient Content and Fungal Contamination of Foods in Developing Countries," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 38(2), pages 1-9, October.
    14. Birol, Ekin & Asare-Marfo, Dorene & Karandikar,Bhushana & Roy, Devesh, 2011. "A latent class approach to investigating farmer demand for biofortified staple food crops in developing countries: The case of high-iron pearl millet in Maharashtra, India," HarvestPlus working papers 7, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    15. Eugene Okraku Asare & Novel Kishor Bhujel & Helena Čížková & Aleš Rajchl, 2022. "Fortification of fruit products - A review," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 40(4), pages 259-272.
    16. Jones, Kelly M. & de Brauw, Alan, 2015. "Using Agriculture to Improve Child Health: Promoting Orange Sweet Potatoes Reduces Diarrhea," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 15-24.
    17. Laxmi Prasad Pant, 2019. "Responsible innovation through conscious contestation at the interface of agricultural science, policy, and civil society," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(2), pages 183-197, June.
    18. Seema Sheoran & Sandeep Kumar & Vinita Ramtekey & Priyajoy Kar & Ram Swaroop Meena & Chetan Kumar Jangir, 2022. "Current Status and Potential of Biofortification to Enhance Crop Nutritional Quality: An Overview," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-27, March.
    19. repec:ags:aaea15:200414 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Evita Pangaribowo & Nicolas Gerber & Pascal Tillie, 2013. "Assessing the FNS impacts of technological and institutional innovations and future innovation trends," FOODSECURE Working papers 11, LEI Wageningen UR.
    21. Qaim, Matin, 2014. "Evaluating nutrition and health impacts of agricultural innovations," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 185785, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    22. Chinnadurai, M. & Karunakaran, K.R. & Chandrasekaran, M. & Balasubramanian, R. & Umanath, M., 2016. "Examining Linkage between Dietary Pattern and Crop Diversification: An Evidence from Tamil Nadu," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 29(Conferenc).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:7:y:2015:i:5:p:163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.