IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jasjnl/v10y2018i3p42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Are Online Shoppers Interested in Learning about Locally Grown Fresh Produce?

Author

Listed:
  • Jean Gumirakiza
  • Thomas Kingery
  • Stephen King

Abstract

This study describes online shoppers, explains their interests in learning about market outlets for locally/regionally grown fresh produce, and analyzes their preferences for channels to receive educational information concerning local/regional fresh produce. We used a K-mean clustering algorithm together with binary and ordered Logit models to analyze data collected in 2016 from a stratified randomly selected sample of 1,205 online shoppers within the U.S. South region. We found that the probability for online shoppers to be interested in learning about market outlets for local/regional grown fresh produce is 66 percent. Results also indicate that the likelihood for the word-of-mouth to be at least preferred (preferred, very preferred, and extremely preferred) as channel to receive educational information about local fresh produce is 69 percent. The probabilities for local radio/TV stations, Internet-based, newspapers, and ads on public places to be at least preferred are 61 percent, 48 percent, 57 percent, and 66 percent respectively. Findings from this study are useful for fresh produce growers, agricultural marketers and educators, online shoppers, and further research studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jean Gumirakiza & Thomas Kingery & Stephen King, 2018. "Are Online Shoppers Interested in Learning about Locally Grown Fresh Produce?," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 1-42, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/download/71266/40356
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jas/article/view/71266
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martinez, Stephen W. & Hand, Michael S. & Da Pra, Michelle & Pollack, Susan L. & Ralston, Katherine L. & Smith, Travis A. & Vogel, Stephen J. & Clark, Shellye & Lohr, Luanne & Low, Sarah A. & Newman, , 2010. "Local Food Systems: Concepts, Impacts, and Issues," Economic Research Report 96635, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
      • Martinez, Steve & Hand, Michael & Da Pra, Michelle & Pollack, Susan & Ralston, Katherine & Smith, Travis & Vogel, Stephen & Clarke, Shellye & Lohr, Luanne & Low, Sarah & Newman, Constance, 2010. "Local food systems: concepts, impacts, and issues," MPRA Paper 24313, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Mas-Colell, Andreu & Whinston, Michael D. & Green, Jerry R., 1995. "Microeconomic Theory," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780195102680.
    3. Lydia Zepeda & Cong Nie, 2012. "What are the odds of being an organic or local food shopper? Multivariate analysis of US food shopper lifestyle segments," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 29(4), pages 467-480, December.
    4. Bond, Jennifer Keeling & Thilmany, Dawn & Bond, Craig, 2009. "What Influences Consumer Choice of Fresh Produce Purchase Location?," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 41(1), pages 61-74, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Onyango, Benjamin & Govindasamy, Ramu & Alsup-Egbers, Clydette Michelle, 2015. "Uncovering Success Attributes for Direct Farmers’ Markets and Agri-Tourism in the Mid-Atlantic Region of the United States," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 18(2), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Besik, Deniz & Nagurney, Anna, 2017. "Quality in competitive fresh produce supply chains with application to farmers' markets," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 62-76.
    3. Stewart, Hayden & Dong, Diansheng, 2018. "How strong is the demand for food through direct-to-consumer outlets?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 35-43.
    4. Caterina Contini & Caterina Romano & Fabio Boncinelli & Gabriele Scozzafava & Leonardo Casini, 2017. "Does ‘local’ matter in restaurant choice? Results of a discrete choice experiment targeting German and Italian consumers," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    5. Kim, Man-Keun & Curtis, Kynda R. & Yeager, Irvin, 2014. "An Assessment of Market Strategies for Small-Scale Produce Growers," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 17(3), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Brian Lee & Jhih‐Yun Liu & Hung‐Hao Chang, 2020. "The choice of marketing channel and farm profitability: Empirical evidence from small farmers," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(3), pages 402-421, June.
    7. Curtis, Kynda R. & Yeager, Irvin & Black, Brent & Drost, Daniel & Ward, Ruby, 2014. "Market and Pricing Potential for Extended Season Fresh Produce Sales: An Intermountain West Example," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 45(2), pages 1-20, July.
    8. Robert Fonner, 2015. "Willingness to Pay for Multiple Seafood Labels in a Niche Market," Marine Resource Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 30(1), pages 51-70.
    9. Lijun Angelia Chen & Bruno Varella Miranda & Joe L. Parcell & Chao Chen, 2019. "The foundations of institutional-based trust in farmers’ markets," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 36(3), pages 395-410, September.
    10. Gumirakiza, Dominique & King, Stephen A. & Kingery, Thomas, "undated". "Clustering Online Shoppers and Explaining their Preferences for Ways to Receive Marketing Information about Local/Regional Fresh Produce," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 259947, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    11. Julius Wenzig & Tim Gruchmann, 2018. "Consumer Preferences for Local Food: Testing an Extended Norm Taxonomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-23, April.
    12. Timothy J. Richards & Stephen F. Hamilton & Miguel Gomez & Elliot Rabinovich, 2017. "Retail Intermediation and Local Foods," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 99(3), pages 637-659.
    13. Lina Wang & Elliot Rabinovich & Timothy J. Richards, 2022. "Scalability in Platforms for Local Groceries: An Examination of Indirect Network Economies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(1), pages 318-340, January.
    14. Wright, Austin L. & Sonin, Konstantin & Driscoll, Jesse & Wilson, Jarnickae, 2020. "Poverty and economic dislocation reduce compliance with COVID-19 shelter-in-place protocols," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 544-554.
    15. Jolian McHardy & Michael Reynolds & Stephen Trotter, 2012. "The Stackelberg Model as a Partial Solution to the Problem of Pricing in a Network," Working Paper series 19_12, Rimini Centre for Economic Analysis.
    16. Janvier D. Nkurunziza, 2005. "Reputation and Credit without Collateral in Africa`s Formal Banking," Economics Series Working Papers WPS/2005-02, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    17. Stephanie Rosenkranz & Patrick W. Schmitz, 2007. "Can Coasean Bargaining Justify Pigouvian Taxation?," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 74(296), pages 573-585, November.
    18. Vadim Borokhov, 2014. "On the properties of nodal price response matrix in electricity markets," Papers 1404.3678, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2015.
    19. Yuzhou Jiang & Ramteen Sioshansi, 2023. "What Duality Theory Tells Us About Giving Market Operators the Authority to Dispatch Energy Storage," The Energy Journal, , vol. 44(3), pages 89-110, May.
    20. Daniel Sutter & Daniel J. Smith, 2017. "Coordination in disaster: Nonprice learning and the allocation of resources after natural disasters," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 30(4), pages 469-492, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jasjnl:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.