IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijpsjl/v8y2016i2p126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Mind-Body Dualism and Personal Values

Author

Listed:
  • Gunne Grankvist
  • Petri Kajonius
  • Bjorn Persson

Abstract

Dualists view the mind and the body as two fundamental different “things†, equally real and independent of each other. Cartesian thought, or substance dualism, maintains that the mind and body are two different substances, the non-physical and the physical, and a causal relationship is assumed to exist between them. Physicalism, on the other hand, is the idea that everything that exists is either physical or totally dependent of and determined by physical items. Hence, all mental states are fundamentally physical states. In the current study we investigated to what degree Swedish university students’ beliefs in mind-body dualism is explained by the importance they attach to personal values. A self-report inventory was used to measure their beliefs and values. Students who held stronger dualistic beliefs attach less importance to the power value (i.e., the effort to achieve social status, prestige, and control or dominance over people and resources). This finding shows that the strength in laypeople’s beliefs in dualism is partially explained by the importance they attach to personal values.

Suggested Citation

  • Gunne Grankvist & Petri Kajonius & Bjorn Persson, 2016. "The Relationship between Mind-Body Dualism and Personal Values," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(2), pages 126-126, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/download/58881/32141
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/view/58881
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Dietz & Linda Kalof & Paul C. Stern, 2002. "Gender, Values, and Environmentalism," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 83(1), pages 353-364, March.
    2. Caroline Doran, 2010. "Fair Trade Consumption: In Support of the Out-Group," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(4), pages 527-541, September.
    3. Caroline Doran, 2009. "The Role of Personal Values in Fair Trade Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 549-563, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jingzhi Shang & John Peloza, 2016. "Can “Real” Men Consume Ethically? How Ethical Consumption Leads to Unintended Observer Inference," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 129-145, November.
    2. Kutaula, Smirti & Gillani, Alvina & Leonidou, Leonidas C. & Christodoulides, Paul, 2022. "Integrating fair trade with circular economy: Personality traits, consumer engagement, and ethically-minded behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1087-1102.
    3. Veronika Andorfer & Ulf Liebe, 2012. "Research on Fair Trade Consumption—A Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(4), pages 415-435, April.
    4. Wintschnig, Bea Alexandra, 2021. "The Attitude-Behavior Gap – Drivers and Barriers of Sustainable Consumption," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 6(2), pages 324-346.
    5. Basso, Frédéric & Bouillé, Julien & Troiville, Julien, 2021. "Are you up for fair-trade products? Vertical dimension as a metaphorical representation of virtuous consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 508-518.
    6. Fred Amofa Yamoah & Rachel Duffy & Dan Petrovici & Andrew Fearne, 2016. "Towards a Framework for Understanding Fairtrade Purchase Intention in the Mainstream Environment of Supermarkets," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(1), pages 181-197, June.
    7. Rommel Salvador & Altaf Merchant & Elizabeth Alexander, 2014. "Faith and Fair Trade: The Moderating Role of Contextual Religious Salience," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 353-371, May.
    8. Xuemei Bian & Yanisa Tantiprapart & George Chryssochoidis & Kai-Yu Wang, 2022. "Counterfeit patronage: human values, counterfeit experience and construal level," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 645-658, December.
    9. Alvina Gillani & Smirti Kutaula & Leonidas C. Leonidou & Paul Christodoulides, 2021. "The Impact of Proximity on Consumer Fair Trade Engagement and Purchasing Behavior: The Moderating Role of Empathic Concern and Hypocrisy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 557-577, March.
    10. Kumju Hwang & Hyewon Kim, 2018. "Are Ethical Consumers Happy? Effects of Ethical Consumers' Motivations Based on Empathy Versus Self-orientation on Their Happiness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 579-598, August.
    11. John James Cater & Lorna A. Collins & Brent D. Beal, 2017. "Ethics, Faith, and Profit: Exploring the Motives of the U.S. Fair Trade Social Entrepreneurs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 185-201, November.
    12. Luigina Canova & Andrea Bobbio & Anna Maria Manganelli, 2023. "Sustainable purchase intentions: The role of moral norm and social dominance orientation in the theory of planned behavior applied to the case of fair trade products," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1069-1083, April.
    13. Kimberly Rios & Stacey Finkelstein & Jennifer Landa, 2015. "Is There a “Fair” in Fair-Trade? Social Dominance Orientation Influences Perceptions of and Preferences for Fair-Trade Products," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(1), pages 171-180, August.
    14. Elena Kossmann & Mónica Gómez-Suárez, 2018. "Decision-making processes for purchases of ethical products: gaps between academic research and needs of marketing practitioners," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 353-370, September.
    15. Enzo Loner, 2016. "A new way of looking at old things. An application of Guttman errors analysis to the study of environmental concern," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 823-847, March.
    16. Kaori Ando & Junkichi Sugiura & Susumu Ohnuma & Kim-Pong Tam & Gundula Hübner & Nahoko Adachi, 2019. "Persuasion Game: Cross Cultural Comparison," Simulation & Gaming, , vol. 50(5), pages 532-555, October.
    17. Witkowski, Terrence H. & Reddy, Sabine, 2010. "Antecedents of ethical consumption activities in Germany and the United States," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 8-14.
    18. Measham, Thomas G. & Zhang, Airong, 2019. "Social licence, gender and mining: Moral conviction and perceived economic importance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 363-368.
    19. Rusitha Wijekoon & Mohamad Fazli Sabri, 2021. "Determinants That Influence Green Product Purchase Intention and Behavior: A Literature Review and Guiding Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-40, May.
    20. Mohamed Akli Achabou & Adel Rink, 2014. "Barrières et motivations pour la consommation des produits de la mode éthique en France," Working Papers 2014-138, Department of Research, Ipag Business School.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:8:y:2016:i:2:p:126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.