IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijpsjl/v2y2010i2p81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation of Objective Person-Environment Fit: The Dark Side of Intelligence

Author

Listed:
  • Kamarul Ahmad

Abstract

Most previous studies of Person-Environment fit have failed to use objective measures of the work environmentthat are independent of the person examined. The current research investigated the moderating role of group size(an objective measure obtained from company records), on the relationship between intelligence and paysatisfaction. The intelligence was measured as general intelligence or “g†and “reasoning†. On the basis of datafrom 257 shop-floor workers in a factory, results indicated that group size moderated the relationship betweenintelligence and satisfaction with pay - the relationship was negative in large groups and positive in smallgroups.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamarul Ahmad, 2010. "An Investigation of Objective Person-Environment Fit: The Dark Side of Intelligence," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(2), pages 1-81, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/download/4407/6366
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijps/article/view/4407
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laku Chidambaram & Lai Lai Tung, 2005. "Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 149-168, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vveinhardt Jolita & Banikonytė Justina, 2017. "Development Perspectives of the Social Group Cohesion in Reducing Social Loafing," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 77(1), pages 185-202, June.
    2. Ofir Turel & Catherine E. Connelly, 2012. "Team Spirit: The Influence of Psychological Collectivism on the Usage of E-Collaboration Tools," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(5), pages 703-725, September.
    3. Isabella Seeber & Ronald Maier & Barbara Weber, 2013. "Macrocognition in Collaboration: Analyzing Processes of Team Knowledge Building with CoPrA," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 915-942, September.
    4. Stefan Stieglitz & Milad Mirbabaie & Nicholas R. J. Möllmann & Jannik Rzyski, 2022. "Collaborating with Virtual Assistants in Organizations: Analyzing Social Loafing Tendencies and Responsibility Attribution," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 745-770, June.
    5. Davide Secchi & Hong T. M. Bui, 2018. "Group Effects on Individual Attitudes Toward Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 725-746, May.
    6. O'Leary, Kevin & Gleasure, Rob & O'Reilly, Philip & Feller, Joseph, 2022. "Introducing the concept of creative ancestry as a means of increasing perceived fairness and satisfaction in online collaboration: An experimental study," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    7. Bryant, Stephanie M. & Albring, Susan M. & Murthy, Uday, 2009. "The effects of reward structure, media richness and gender on virtual teams," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 10(4), pages 190-213.
    8. J. H. Jung & Christoph Schneider & Joseph Valacich, 2010. "Enhancing the Motivational Affordance of Information Systems: The Effects of Real-Time Performance Feedback and Goal Setting in Group Collaboration Environments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(4), pages 724-742, April.
    9. Mesmer-Magnus, Jessica R. & DeChurch, Leslie A. & Jimenez-Rodriguez, Miliani & Wildman, Jessica & Shuffler, Marissa, 2011. "A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 214-225, July.
    10. Chou, Shih-Wei & Hsu, Chia-Shiang, 2018. "An empirical investigation on knowledge use in virtual communities–A relationship development perspective," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 243-255.
    11. Jiye Baek & Jesse Shore, 2020. "Forum Size and Content Contribution per Person: A Field Experiment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5906-5924, December.
    12. Chen, Fang & Zhang, Limin & Latimer, Joseph, 2014. "How much has my co-worker contributed? The impact of anonymity and feedback on social loafing in asynchronous virtual collaboration," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 652-659.
    13. Craig Galbraith & Alex DeNoble & Sanford Ehrlich & Jessica Mesmer-Magnus, 2010. "Review panel consensus and post-decision commercial performance: a study of early stage technologies," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 253-281, April.
    14. George, Charles & Gibson, Cristina B. & Barbour, Jennifer, 2022. "Shared leadership across cultures: Do traditionalism and virtuality matter?," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1).
    15. Kent Marett & Joey F. George, 2013. "Barriers to Deceiving Other Group Members in Virtual Settings," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 89-115, January.
    16. Jorge Colazo, 2016. "A Cognitive Load View And Empirical Test Of Collaboration Network Structure Versus Learning Rates In New Software Development," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-28, January.
    17. Meng Ma & Ritu Agarwal, 2007. "Through a Glass Darkly: Information Technology Design, Identity Verification, and Knowledge Contribution in Online Communities," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 42-67, March.
    18. Sang-Heui Lee & David DeWester & So Park, 2008. "Web 2.0 and opportunities for small businesses," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 2(4), pages 335-345, November.
    19. Bolger, Fergus & Rowe, Gene & Belton, Ian & Crawford, Megan M & Hamlin, Iain & Sissons, Aileen & Taylor Browne Lūka, Courtney & Vasilichi, Alexandrina & Wright, George, 2020. "The Simulated Group Response Paradigm: A new approach to the study of opinion change in Delphi and other structured-group techniques," OSF Preprints 4ufzg, Center for Open Science.
    20. Kamarul Zaman Ahmad, 2010. "Pay Equity Sensitivity and Person-Environment Fit," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(2), pages 127-127, December.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijpsjl:v:2:y:2010:i:2:p:81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.