IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijmsjn/v10y2020i4p60.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Visual Structure of Pictorial Metaphors on Advertisement Attitudes

Author

Listed:
  • Shuo Cao
  • Huili Wang
  • Xiaoxia Zou

Abstract

With the development of the economy, the advertising industry has also flourished, and visual metaphors have been frequently used in advertising. Through the use of visual metaphor, advertisers are eager to give consumers a deep impression, and the ultimate goal is to sell the products in the ads. Previous visual metaphor research has contributes more to understand the needs of consumers better, and offered advertisers some guidance in the advertising design. The current study works on the liking degree of people of different backgrounds toward the ads using visual metaphor of hybrid structure. This study takes 101 Chinese college students as participants to measure the extent to which they appreciate the ads using visual metaphors. 20 sets of ad pictures, covering a wide range of products, categorized conceptually and perceptually, are tested in terms of ad liking, elaboration, and comprehension. The results indicate that the visual pictures that have both similar functions and shapes rank top in all the perspectives examined, followed by those having dissimilar shape and similar function and those having similar shape and dissimilar function. The visual pictures that are dissimilar both in shape and in function are least favored. In addition, demographical analysis was performed, showing a higher appreciation for the ad visual metaphors among participants of bachelor’s degree and master’s degree, females and younger generation. Moreover, the findings, with specific marketing implication for designing and managing visual metaphors in ads, are very valuable for marketers who target at college students.

Suggested Citation

  • Shuo Cao & Huili Wang & Xiaoxia Zou, 2020. "The Effect of Visual Structure of Pictorial Metaphors on Advertisement Attitudes," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(4), pages 1-60, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijmsjn:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:60
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijms/article/download/0/0/37520/37843
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijms/article/view/0/37520
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McQuarrie, Edward F & Mick, David Glen, 1996. "Figures of Rhetoric in Advertising Language," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 22(4), pages 424-438, March.
    2. Mothersbaugh, David L & Huhmann, Bruce A & Franke, George R, 2002. "Combinatory and Separative Effects of Rhetorical Figures on Consumers' Effort and Focus in Ad Processing," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 28(4), pages 589-602, March.
    3. Heckler, Susan E & Childers, Terry L, 1992. "The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What Is Incongruency?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 18(4), pages 475-492, March.
    4. McQuarrie, Edward F & Mick, David Glen, 2003. "Visual and Verbal Rhetorical Figures under Directed Processing versus Incidental Exposure to Advertising," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(4), pages 579-587, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chu, Kyounghee & Lee, Do-Hee & Kim, Ji Yoon, 2019. "The effect of verbal brand personification on consumer evaluation in advertising: Internal and external personification," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 472-480.
    2. Gavin L. Fox & Stephen J. Lind, 2020. "A framework for viral marketing replication and mutation," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 10(3), pages 206-222, December.
    3. Anne A. Christopher, 2013. "Rhetorical Strategies in Advertising: The Rise and Fall Pattern," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 2, October.
    4. Boujena, Othman & Ulrich, Isabelle & Piris, Yolande & Chicheportiche, Laëtitia, 2021. "Using food pictorial metaphor in the advertising of non-food brands: An exploratory investigation of consumer interpretation and affective response," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Carnevale, Marina & Luna, David & Lerman, Dawn, 2017. "Brand linguistics: A theory-driven framework for the study of language in branding," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 572-591.
    6. Varsha Jain & Subhadip Roy & Adwita Pant, 2013. "Effect of colour and relative product size (RPS) on consumer attitudes," Transnational Marketing Journal, Oxbridge Publishing House, UK, vol. 1(1), pages 41-58, October.
    7. Xiaojing Yang & Robert E. Smith, 2009. "Beyond Attention Effects: Modeling the Persuasive and Emotional Effects of Advertising Creativity," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(5), pages 935-949, 09-10.
    8. Lau, Hei Tong & Lee, Richard, 2018. "Ethnic media advertising effectiveness, influences and implications," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 216-220.
    9. Errajaa, Karim & Legohérel, Patrick & Daucé, Bruno, 2018. "Immersion and emotional reactions to the ambiance of a multiservice space: The role of perceived congruence between odor and brand image," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 100-108.
    10. Nicole Darnall & Hyunjung Ji & Kazuyuki Iwata & Toshi H. Arimura, 2022. "Do ESG reporting guidelines and verifications enhance firms' information disclosure?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1214-1230, September.
    11. Christophe Bezes, 2010. "Tout ce qui est congruent, est-il similaire ? Propositions de définition du concept de congruence en marketing," Post-Print hal-00573441, HAL.
    12. Kimberly F. Luchtenberg & Michael J. Seiler & Hua Sun, 2019. "Listing Agent Signals: Does a Picture Paint a Thousand Words?," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 59(4), pages 617-648, November.
    13. Jae, Haeran & Viswanathan, Madhubalan, 2012. "Effects of pictorial product-warnings on low-literate consumers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(12), pages 1674-1682.
    14. Venkatesh, P. & Sinha, Piyush Kumar, 2008. "An Investigation of Incongruency and Distraction Hypotheses: The Context of Dubbed TV Commercials," IIMA Working Papers WP2008-08-03, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    15. Errajaa, Karim & Daucé, Bruno & Legohérel, Patrick, 2020. "Consumer reactions to olfactory congruence with brand image," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    16. Lambillotte, Laetitia & Magrofuoco, Nathan & Poncin, Ingrid & Vanderdonckt, Jean, 2022. "Enhancing playful customer experience with personalization," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    17. Soojung Kim & Jiyang Bae, 2016. "Cross-cultural differences in concrete and abstract corporate social responsibility (CSR) campaigns: perceived message clarity and perceived CSR as mediators," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, December.
    18. Michelle Amazeen, 2011. "Gap (RED): Social Responsibility Campaign or Window Dressing?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 99(2), pages 167-182, March.
    19. Lim, Elison Ai Ching & Ang, Swee Hoon, 2008. "Hedonic vs. utilitarian consumption: A cross-cultural perspective based on cultural conditioning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 61(3), pages 225-232, March.
    20. Lee, Michael S.W. & Septianto, Felix & Frethey-Bentham, Catherine & Gao, Esther, 2020. "Condoms and bananas: Shock advertising explained through congruence theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijmsjn:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:60. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.