IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/ijbmjn/v15y2021i6p204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stock Prices Analysis of State-Owned Enterprise and Non-State-Owned Enterprise in Response to Negative Information Period 2017-2019

Author

Listed:
  • Raka Daniel Lihardo Sumbayak
  • Tony Irawan
  • Trias Andati

Abstract

There were bad news affected stock prices, i.e. Fraud and bad financial performance. Fraud on State Owned Enterprises (SOE) listed companies was suspected to have a stronger impact on stock prices compared to Non-SOE issuers. The effect of bad financial performance on Non-SOE issuers was thought to have a stronger impact on stock prices when compared to SOE issuers. This research was conducted on SOE and non-SOE that experienced fraud and bad financial performance from 2017 to 2019. Data analysis was performed with the Google Search Volume Index, Difference Test, and Multiple Linear Regression Analysis. The data from Google Search Volume Index showed that SOE issuers were more searched by the public when compared to Non-SOE issuers in responding to Fraud and bad financial performance. Linear Regression Analysis found that the decline in stock prices of SOE issuers was lower than the Non-SOE issuers in response to Fraud. The decline in stock prices of SOE issuers in response to the bad financial performance in the Property and Finance sectors was lower than the decline in stock prices of Non-SOE issuers. However, the decline in the stock prices of Non-SOE companies in response to the bad financial performance in the Basic Industry sector was lower than the SOE issuers. This could be influenced by SOE stock ownership dominated by the Indonesian government and the existence of a Conservatism Bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Raka Daniel Lihardo Sumbayak & Tony Irawan & Trias Andati, 2021. "Stock Prices Analysis of State-Owned Enterprise and Non-State-Owned Enterprise in Response to Negative Information Period 2017-2019," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 15(6), pages 204-204, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:15:y:2021:i:6:p:204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/download/0/0/42914/44872
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ijbm/article/view/0/42914
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wu, Chen-Hui & Wu, Chin-Shun & Liu, Victor W., 2009. "The conservatism bias in an emerging stock market: Evidence from Taiwan," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 494-505, September.
    2. Nazrul Hisyam Ab Razak & Rubi Ahmad & Huson Aliahmed Joher, 2011. "Does Government Linked Companies (GLCs) perform better than non-GLCs? Evidence from Malaysian listed companies," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 1(1), pages 1-10.
    3. Takeda, Fumiko & Wakao, Takumi, 2014. "Google search intensity and its relationship with returns and trading volume of Japanese stocks," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 1-18.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Said, Jamaliah & Alam, Md. Mahmudul & Abdullah, Nik Herda Nik & Zulkarnain, Nur Nadiah, 2019. "Market Orientation for Better Accountability of Government-Linked Companies," SocArXiv uxfqa, Center for Open Science.
    2. Chien-jung Ting & Yi-Long Hsiao, 2022. "Nowcasting the GDP in Taiwan and the Real-Time Tourism Data," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 1-2.
    3. Hervé, Fabrice & Zouaoui, Mohamed & Belvaux, Bertrand, 2019. "Noise traders and smart money: Evidence from online searches," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 141-149.
    4. Ronald MacDonald & Xuxin Mao, 2015. "An Alternative way of Predicting the Outcome of the Scottish Independence Referendum: The Information in the Ether," 2007 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, 2007, Portland, Oregon TN 2015-69, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Kao, Lanfeng & Chen, Anlin & Lu, Cheng-Shou, 2022. "Retail investor attention and IPO prices with a pre-IPO market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 416-432.
    6. Jayant Menon & Thiam Hee Ng, 2013. "Are Government-Linked Corporations Crowding out Private Investment in Malaysia?," Departmental Working Papers 2013-03, The Australian National University, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics.
    7. Ronald MacDonald & Xuxin Mao, "undated". "An Alternative way of predicting the putcome of the Scottish Independence Referendum: the information in the Ether," Working Papers 2015_05, Business School - Economics, University of Glasgow.
    8. Chien-jung Ting & Yi-Long Hsiao & Rui-jun Su, 2022. "Application of the Real-Time Tourism Data in Nowcasting the Service Consumption in Taiwan," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 1-4.
    9. A. Sarath Babu, 2019. "Investors` attention and American depository receipts pricing: evidence from Indian stocks," Asian Journal of Empirical Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 9(12), pages 381-386, December.
    10. Chaiyuth Padungsaksawasdi & Sirimon Treepongkaruna & Robert Brooks, 2019. "Investor Attention and Stock Market Activities: New Evidence from Panel Data," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Lee, Chien-Chiang & Chen, Mei-Ping, 2021. "The effects of investor attention and policy uncertainties on cross-border country exchange-traded fund returns," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 830-852.
    12. Azimli, Asil, 2020. "The impact of COVID-19 on the degree of dependence and structure of risk-return relationship: A quantile regression approach," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    13. Nattapong Laksomya & John G. Powell & Suparatana Tanthanongsakkun & Sirimon Treepongkaruna, 2018. "Are Internet message boards used to facilitate stock price manipulation? Evidence from an emerging market, Thailand," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 58(S1), pages 275-309, November.
    14. Salisu, Afees A. & Vo, Xuan Vinh, 2021. "Firm-specific news and the predictability of Consumer stocks in Vietnam," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    15. Tariq Aziz & Valeed Ahmad Ansari, 2021. "How Does Google Search Affect the Stock Market? Evidence from Indian Companies," Vision, , vol. 25(2), pages 224-232, June.
    16. Zhibing Li & Jie Liu & Xiaoyu Liu & Chonglin Wu, 2024. "Investor attention and stock price efficiency: Evidence from quasi‐natural experiments in China," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 53(1), pages 175-225, March.
    17. Paritosh Chandra Sinha, 2024. "Noise of Investors’ Attention Mania in the Twenty-first-Century Indian Stock Markets: ARDL and Augmented GARCH-X Models," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(5), pages 1171-1221, October.
    18. Szymon Lis, 2022. "Investor Sentiment in Asset Pricing Models: A Review," Working Papers 2022-14, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    19. Sakthivel SANTHOSHKUMAR & Murugesan SELVAM & Balasundram MANIAM, 2023. "The relationship between google trends search and energy commodity prices," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(4(637), W), pages 291-298, Winter.
    20. Christophe Desagre & Catherine D'Hondt, 2020. "Googlization and retail investors' trading activity," LIDAM Discussion Papers LFIN 2020004, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain Finance (LFIN).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:ijbmjn:v:15:y:2021:i:6:p:204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.