IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v16y2023i2p22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Characteristic Features of PhD Programs in ELT among Sudanese Universities (Study at Nile Valley University and SUST 2021- 2022)

Author

Listed:
  • Omsalma Ibrahim Mohamed Ahmed
  • Musa Abubaker Musa Saleh

Abstract

The motion of holding a PhD Degree among Sudanese EFL learners is increased widely throughout Sudan. Most of PhD candidates prefer to study courses followed by complementary research. This study aims to explore students’ views on the PhD in ELT programs by courses and complementary research at some Sudanese universities. The study was conducted to investigate these programs and an attempt to achieve the following objectives- 1- To identify the most prevalent characteristic features of each of these programs. 2- To explore whether the contents of the program satisfy the needs of students or not. 3- To what extent the syllabuses in the programs help to qualify the candidates to become qualified teachers of English language. The study also serves as a needs analysis which was a very important point for the betterment of every ongoing program. The researcher applied the descriptive research method to achieve the study objectives. A questionnaire was used for the data collection. The participants in the study were students enrolled in PhD in ELT programs and graduates who had already graduated from these programs. Then, the data were statistically analysed to evaluate the PhD in ELT programs. The results showed that most participants agree that the contents of the program satisfy the needs of students. Many participants agree that the syllabuses offered in the programs help to qualify students to become qualified teachers of English language.

Suggested Citation

  • Omsalma Ibrahim Mohamed Ahmed & Musa Abubaker Musa Saleh, 2023. "Exploring the Characteristic Features of PhD Programs in ELT among Sudanese Universities (Study at Nile Valley University and SUST 2021- 2022)," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/48257/51893
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/48257
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Luskin, Rebecca J.C. & Ho, Timothy, 2013. "Comparing the intended consequences of three theories of evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 61-66.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wu, Huang & Shen, Jianping & Jones, Jeffrey & Gao, Xingyuan & Zheng, Yunzheng & Krenn, Huilan Y., 2019. "Using logic model and visualization to conduct portfolio evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 69-75.
    2. Miller, Robin Lin, 2013. "Logic models: A useful way to study theories of evaluation practice?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 77-80.
    3. Cousins, J. Bradley, 2013. "When does a conceptual framework become a theory? Reflections from an accidental theorist," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 67-70.
    4. Dillman, Lisa M., 2013. "Comparing evaluation activities across multiple theories of practice," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 53-60.
    5. Mark, Melvin M. & Henry, Gary T., 2013. "Logic models and content analyses for the explication of evaluation theories: The case of emergent realist evaluation," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 74-76.
    6. Schalock, Robert L. & Lee, Tim & Verdugo, Miguel & Swart, Kees & Claes, Claudia & van Loon, Jos & Lee, Chun-Shin, 2014. "An evidence-based approach to organization evaluation and change in human service organizations evaluation and program planning," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 110-118.
    7. Hansen, Mark & Alkin, Marvin C. & Wallace, Tanner LeBaron, 2013. "Depicting the logic of three evaluation theories," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 34-43.
    8. Gargani, John, 2013. "What can practitioners learn from theorists’ logic models?," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 81-88.
    9. Jacobson, Miriam R. & Azzam, Tarek, 2018. "The effects of stakeholder involvement on perceptions of an evaluation’s credibility," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 64-73.
    10. Schalock, Robert L. & Verdugo, Miguel & Lee, Tim, 2016. "A systematic approach to an organization’s sustainability," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 56-63.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:16:y:2023:i:2:p:22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.