IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v19y2023i1p36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Communicating Sustainability Fashion in Marketing Advertisements on the Context of Malaysia: Stimuli Development and Pre-Testing Results

Author

Listed:
  • Nornajihah Nadia Hasbullah
  • Ag Kaifah Riyard Kiflee
  • Zuraidah Sulaiman
  • Adaviah Mas’od
  • Hainnuraqma Rahim

Abstract

Although awareness of sustainable fashion in Malaysia is present, it is growing slowly. Consumers may find it challenging to understand messages or communicating advertisements on pro-environmental actions. Accordingly, stimuli development was designed in this study using regulatory focus theory for the structural development of an advertisement message. The advertisement content was generated based on promotion and prevention regulatory focus messages. This pre-testing study involved 30 university students who were randomly assigned to one of two treatment conditions- promotion or prevention regulatory focus message (n = 15 per group). The data were analysed with an independent samples t-test. The advertisement with the promotion-focused message was more persuasive than that with the prevention-focused message. The findings suggest guidelines for practitioners to devise effective strategies when designing advertisements that will not only help firms obtain personal benefits but also benefit society and the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Nornajihah Nadia Hasbullah & Ag Kaifah Riyard Kiflee & Zuraidah Sulaiman & Adaviah Mas’od & Hainnuraqma Rahim, 2023. "Communicating Sustainability Fashion in Marketing Advertisements on the Context of Malaysia: Stimuli Development and Pre-Testing Results," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 19(1), pages 1-36, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:19:y:2023:i:1:p:36
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/0/0/48311/51958
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/0/48311
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gabriella Marcatajo, 2021. "Green claims, green washing and consumer protection in the European Union," Journal of Financial Crime, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 30(1), pages 143-153, December.
    2. Naa Amponsah Dodoo & Linwan Wu, 2019. "Exploring the anteceding impact of personalised social media advertising on online impulse buying tendency," International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(1), pages 73-95.
    3. Bettman, James R & Sujan, Mita, 1987. "Effects of Framing on Evaluation of Comparable and Noncomparable Alternatives by Expert and Novice Consumers," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 14(2), pages 141-154, September.
    4. Meital Peleg Mizrachi & Alon Tal, 2022. "Regulation for Promoting Sustainable, Fair and Circular Fashion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-28, January.
    5. Kuppelwieser, Volker G. & Klaus, Phil & Manthiou, Aikaterini & Boujena, Othman, 2019. "Consumer responses to planned obsolescence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 157-165.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Roberts, Simon H. & Foran, Barney D. & Axon, Colin J. & Stamp, Alice V., 2021. "Is the service industry really low-carbon? Energy, jobs and realistic country GHG emissions reductions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Yang Zhao & Yixuan Li & Ning Wang & Ruoxin Zhou & Xin (Robert) Luo, 2022. "A Meta-Analysis of Online Impulsive Buying and the Moderating Effect of Economic Development Level," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(5), pages 1667-1688, October.
    3. Tubetov, Dulat & Maart, Syster Christin & Musshoff, Oliver, 2012. "Comparison of the investment behavior of Kazakhstani and German farmers: An experimental approach," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 125218, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Momi Dahan & Tehila Kogut & Moshe Shalem, 2009. "Do Economic Policymakers Practice what they Preach? The Case of Pension Decisions," CESifo Working Paper Series 2783, CESifo.
    5. Müller-Seitz, Gordon & Dautzenberg, Kirsti & Creusen, Utho & Stromereder, Christine, 2009. "Customer acceptance of RFID technology: Evidence from the German electronic retail sector," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 31-39.
    6. Kwon, Kyoung-Nan & Lee, Jinkook, 2009. "The effects of reference point, knowledge, and risk propensity on the evaluation of financial products," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 62(7), pages 719-725, July.
    7. Anastassiadis, Friederike & Liebe, Ulf & Musshoff, Oliver, 2012. "Finanzielle Flexibilität In Landwirtschaftlichen Investitionsentscheidungen: Ein Discrete Choice Experiment," 52nd Annual Conference, Stuttgart, Germany, September 26-28, 2012 137142, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
    8. Viswanath Venkatesh, 2000. "Determinants of Perceived Ease of Use: Integrating Control, Intrinsic Motivation, and Emotion into the Technology Acceptance Model," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 342-365, December.
    9. Naderi, Iman & Paswan, Audhesh K. & Guzman, Francisco, 2018. "Beyond the shadow of a doubt: The effect of consumer knowledge on restaurant evaluation," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 221-229.
    10. Lee, Jihyun & Lee, Yuri, 2015. "The interactions of CSR, self-congruity and purchase intention among Chinese consumers," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 19-26.
    11. Yi Yong Lee & Chin Lay Gan, 2020. "Applications of SOR and para-social interactions (PSI) towards impulse buying: the Malaysian perspective," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(2), pages 85-98, June.
    12. Tubetov, Dulat & Maart, Syster Christin & Musshoff, Oliver, 2012. "Comparison of the Investment Behavior of German and Kazakhstani Farmers: an Experimental Approach," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 122422, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    13. Olshavsky, Richard W. & Aylesworth, Andrew B. & Kempf, DeAnna S., 1995. "The price-choice relationship: A contingent processing approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 207-218, July.
    14. Aljukhadar, Muhammad & Senecal, Sylvain, 2016. "The user multifaceted expertise: Divergent effects of the website versus e-commerce expertise," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 322-332.
    15. Roest, Henk & Rindfleisch, Aric, 2010. "The influence of quality cues and typicality cues on restaurant purchase intention," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 10-18.
    16. Gin, Xavier & Yang, Dean, 2009. "Insurance, credit, and technology adoption: Field experimental evidencefrom Malawi," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 1-11, May.
    17. Agarwal, James & Malhotra, Naresh K., 2005. "An integrated model of attitude and affect: Theoretical foundation and an empirical investigation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(4), pages 483-493, April.
    18. Simonson, Itamar, 2005. "In Defense of Consciousness: The Role of Conscious and Unconscious Inputs in Consumer Choice," Research Papers 1883, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    19. Yi Yong Lee & Chin Lay Gan, 0. "Applications of SOR and para-social interactions (PSI) towards impulse buying: the Malaysian perspective," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 0, pages 1-14.
    20. Paula Ziyeh & Marco Cinelli, 2023. "A Framework to Navigate Eco-Labels in the Textile and Clothing Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-29, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:19:y:2023:i:1:p:36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.