IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v14y2018i12p156.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

E-Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation: Why do Users Continue with E-Cigarettes?

Author

Listed:
  • A.L.S. Foong
  • M.Y.Y. Lai

Abstract

The advent of e-cigarettes (vaping) well over a decade ago, was welcomed as a tool to aid cigarette smoking cessation. Whilst it has served its aims for many, there remains several who switched to vaping but did not cease cigarette smoking. They also continued with vaping behaviours. The aim of this study is to identify and gain a better understanding of why their vaping behaviours continue. With that in mind, a qualitative study with focus groups was undertaken. A purposive convenience sample of 17 participants who are patrons of 3 vaping centres in the city of Kuala Lumpur were recruited. Four focus groups were formed from the sample of 17 participants. Data derived from the focus groups identified seven themes which emerged as motivating factors for continued vaping behaviours. They comprised of social acceptance; attraction to flavours; a sense of accomplishment; financial savings; convenience compared to smoking; perceived low health risk; and behavioural substitution. Findings suggest that vaping behaviours could be conceptualised by Choice Theory based on psychosocial needs of survival, achievement, love and belonging, freedom and fun. They highlight the role of psychosocial factors that could be considered of importance in informing policy and practices for smoking cessation programmes and activities.

Suggested Citation

  • A.L.S. Foong & M.Y.Y. Lai, 2018. "E-Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation: Why do Users Continue with E-Cigarettes?," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(12), pages 156-156, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:12:p:156
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/0/0/37636/37985
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/0/37636
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ling, P.M. & Glantz, S.A., 2002. "Why and how the tobacco industry sells cigarettes to young adults: Evidence from industry documents," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(6), pages 908-916.
    2. Song, A.V. & Ling, P.M., 2011. "Social smoking among young adults: Investigation of intentions and attempts to quit," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(7), pages 1291-1296.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuhan Zhang & Jiayu Wang & Keying Lai & Hankun Bian & Haide Chen & Lingfeng Gao, 2022. "Socializing with Smoker and Social Smoking Behavior among Chinese Male Smokers with Low Nicotine Dependence: The Mediating Roles of Belief of Smoking Rationalization and Smoker Identity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-12, November.
    2. Ling, P M & Glantz, S A, 2004. "Tobacco industry research on smoking cessation - Recapturing young adults and other recent quitters," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt2t823095, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.
    3. Page D. Dobbs & Jason B. Colditz & Shelby Shields & Anna Meadows & Brian A. Primack, 2022. "Policy and Behavior: Comparisons between Twitter Discussions about the US Tobacco 21 Law and Other Age-Related Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, February.
    4. Mohd Hanief Ahmad & Mohd Ismail Ibrahim & Azriani Ab Rahman & Kamarul Imran Musa & Faridah Mohd Zin & Rehanah Mohd Zain & Ruhaya Hasan & Noraryana Hassan & Imran Ahmad & Nur Suhaila Idris, 2019. "Development and Validation of Positive Smoker Identity Questionnaire (PSmoQi): A New Instrument for Smoking Cessation Correlates," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Nhung Nguyen & Louisa M. Holmes & Minji Kim & Pamela M. Ling, 2020. "Using Peer Crowd Affiliation to Address Dual Use of Cigarettes and E-Cigarettes among San Francisco Bay Area Young Adults: A Cross Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-13, October.
    6. Dorie E Apollonio & Lauren M Dutra & Stanton A Glantz, 2021. "Associations between smoking trajectories, smoke-free laws and cigarette taxes in a longitudinal sample of youth and young adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, February.
    7. Marysia Ogrodnik, 2016. "Investigating the determinants of smoking cessation: from the desire to quit to the effective attempt," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 16052, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    8. Scott, Kristin A. & Mason, Marlys J. & Mason, James D., 2015. "I'm not a smoker: Constructing protected prototypes for risk behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 2198-2206.
    9. Allison C. Veronda & Leah A. Irish & Douglas L. Delahanty, 2020. "Effect of smoke exposure on young adults' sleep quality," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 57-63, March.
    10. Carla J. Berg & Yael Bar-Zeev & Hagai Levine, 2020. "Informing iQOS Regulations in the United States: A Synthesis of What We Know," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    11. Anderson, Stacey J. & Pollay, Richard W. & Ling, Pamela M., 2006. "Taking ad-Vantage of lax advertising regulation in the USA and Canada: Reassuring and distracting health-concerned smokers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 1973-1985, October.
    12. Adrian E. Ghenadenik & Katherine L. Frohlich & Lise Gauvin, 2016. "Beyond Smoking Prevalence: Exploring the Variability of Associations between Neighborhood Exposures across Two Nested Spatial Units and Two-Year Smoking Trajectory among Young Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Bo Yang & Jiaying Liu & Lucy Popova, 2018. "Targeted Versus Nontargeted Communication About Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems in Three Smoker Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, September.
    14. Joan Hanafin & Luke Clancy, 2020. "A qualitative study of e-cigarette use among young people in Ireland: Incentives, disincentives, and putative cessation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-20, December.
    15. Deepa R. Camenga & Angela M. Haeny & Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin & Stephanie S. O’Malley & Krysten W. Bold, 2021. "Pilot Ecological Momentary Assessment Study of Subjective and Contextual Factors Surrounding E-Cigarette and Combustible Tobacco Product Use among Young Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-11, October.
    16. Madeleine Steinmetz-Wood & Thierry Gagné & Marie-Pierre Sylvestre & Katherine Frohlich, 2018. "Do social characteristics influence smoking uptake and cessation during young adulthood?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(1), pages 115-123, January.
    17. Marysia Ogrodnik, 2016. "Investigating the determinants of smoking cessation: from the desire to quit to the effective attempt," Post-Print halshs-01379240, HAL.
    18. Stefanie Mollborn & Juhee Woo & Richard G. Rogers, 2018. "A longitudinal examination of US teen childbearing and smoking risk," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 38(24), pages 619-650.
    19. Erika Melonashi & Fleura Shkembi, 2015. "A Predictive Model for Physical Activity, Healthy Eating, Alcohol Drinking, and Risky Driving Among Albanian Youth," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(2), pages 21582440155, April.
    20. Laura Campo & Silvia Lumia & Silvia Fustinoni, 2022. "Assessing Smoking Habits, Attitudes, Knowledge, and Needs among University Students at the University of Milan, Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:14:y:2018:i:12:p:156. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.