IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/beaccr/v1y2009i1p29-44.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Use Of Case Analysis Training And Competitions To Assure Learning And School-Wide Quality

Author

Listed:
  • Sid Howard Credle
  • Ruby L. Beale
  • Sharad Maheshwari

Abstract

Accrediting agencies have mandated that member schools provide evidence of the assurance of learning of students in the educational process. This study describes a learning structure based on student participation in case study analysis. After training 103 business students in case method analysis an assessment test of concepts underlying case analysis was administered. Students were given two opportunities to pass the assessment test with a score of 80 percent or higher. The first assessment had an overall pass rate of 87 percent. It was found that upperclassmen performed significantly better than underclassmen with an average score of 91 versus 84 percent. The authors validate the use of the case analysis by engaging students in national case competitions. Based on the portfolio outcomes of the case competitions the authors create an annual Key Performance Index for the School. This index assesses the School’s overall success in competing in and winning national case competitions. It is suggested that the combination of case analysis training, followed by competitive case performance, provides important student competencies and skills and that the data gathered from such activity outcomes can be used to assess the quality of the educational delivery system of the School.

Suggested Citation

  • Sid Howard Credle & Ruby L. Beale & Sharad Maheshwari, 2009. "The Use Of Case Analysis Training And Competitions To Assure Learning And School-Wide Quality," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 1(1), pages 29-44.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibf:beaccr:v:1:y:2009:i:1:p:29-44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/beaccr/bea-v1n1-2009/BEA-V1N1-2009-3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J J Cochran, 2000. "Introductory business OR cases: successful use of cases in introductory undergraduate business college operational research courses," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 51(12), pages 1378-1385, December.
    2. Sid Howard Credle & Sharad Maheshwari & Janelle Pridgen Davenport, 2008. "An Alternative Ranking Methodology Of The Best Colleges And Universities For African-Americans," Global Journal of Business Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 2(2), pages 49-66.
    3. Joan Ballantine & Patricia McCourt Larres, 2004. "A critical analysis of students' perceptions of the usefulness of the case study method in an advanced management accounting module: the impact of relevant work experience," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 171-189.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel M. Frances & Daria Terekhov, 2019. "A Case-Based Undergraduate Operations Research Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 67-80, January.
    2. Paisey, Catriona & Paisey, Nicholas J., 2010. "Developing skills via work placements in accounting: Student and employer views," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 89-108.
    3. Gary Spraakman & Beverley Jackling, 2014. "A Conceptual Framework for Learning Management Accounting," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1), pages 61-81, March.
    4. Aldónio Ferreira & Andrijani Santoso, 2008. "Do students’ perceptions matter? A study of the effect of students’ perceptions on academic performance," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 48(2), pages 209-231, June.
    5. Sandra Milena Munoz López & Gustavo Alberto Ruiz Rojas & Héctor José Sarmiento Ramírez, 2015. "Didácticas para la formación en investigación contable: una discusión crítica de las prácticas de ensenanza," Revista Facultad de Ciencias Económicas, Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, vol. 0(1), pages 53-86, June.
    6. Georgiou, Ion, 2008. "Making decisions in the absence of clear facts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 299-321, February.
    7. Pavel Strach & Irena Stejskalova, 2015. "New Didactic Approaches in Accounting: Moving Beyond the Calculation Exercise," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 2304424, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    8. Jesús Muñuzuri & Pablo Cortés & Rafael Grosso & Luis Onieva, 2016. "Teaching Heuristic Methods to Industrial Engineers: A Problem-Based Experience," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 60-67, January.
    9. Joseph, George & Trubey, Richard, 2022. "Café Solar® – Sustainable coffee in Central America," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    10. Matthew J. Drake, 2019. "Teaching OR/MS with Cases: A Review and New Suggestions," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 57-66, January.
    11. Satoshi Sugahara & Roanne Coman, 2010. "Perceived Importance of CPA’s Generic Skills: A Japanese Study," Asian Journal of Finance & Accounting, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 124-124, December.
    12. Cochran, James J., 2012. "You want them to remember? Then make it memorable! Means for enhancing operations research education," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 659-670.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Case analysis; Case competitions; Assurance of Learning; Communication Skills Development; Student Competencies; Key Performance Index;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • A2 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics
    • M00 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:beaccr:v:1:y:2009:i:1:p:29-44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.