IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hur/ijarbs/v6y2016i5p172-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is 360 Degree Feedback Appraisal an Effective Way of Performance Evaluation?

Author

Listed:
  • Ece Kuzulu Kanaslan
  • Cemal Iyem

Abstract

The 360 degree feedback approach has been implemented by many organisations for development or performance evaluation objectives. This paper questions the effectiveness of 360 degree feedback implementations in rating employee performance. This literature review was conducted on 360 degree feedback practice with performance evaluation purposes. The aim of this review was to define and discuss the 360 degree feedback; contrasting the process with the other methods and identifying whether this is a good way of performing appraising or not. The superiority of multi-rater feedback to the traditional methods and the dominance of advantages over disadvantages lead us to conclude that the 360 degree feedback is effective in rating performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ece Kuzulu Kanaslan & Cemal Iyem, 2016. "Is 360 Degree Feedback Appraisal an Effective Way of Performance Evaluation?," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(5), pages 172-182, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:6:y:2016:i:5:p:172-182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Is_360_Degree_Feedback_Appraisal_an_Effective_Way_of_Performance_Evaluation.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://hrmars.com/hrmars_papers/Is_360_Degree_Feedback_Appraisal_an_Effective_Way_of_Performance_Evaluation.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kurtzberg, Terri R. & Naquin, Charles E. & Belkin, Liuba Y., 2005. "Electronic performance appraisals: The effects of e-mail communication on peer ratings in actual and simulated environments," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 98(2), pages 216-226, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samantha Shewchuk & James Wallace & Mia Seibold, 2023. "Evaluations of training programs to improve capacity in K*: a systematic scoping review of methods applied and outcomes assessed," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Marius-Emanuel Caragea, 2024. "Modern Challenges To The Management Of Public Institutions. The Influence Of Appreciation On Institutional Dynamics, With A Focus On Military Organizations," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 147-155, August.
    3. Yasuda, Hiroki, 2023. "Employers’ stereotypes and taste-based discrimination," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sweldens, Steven & Puntoni, Stefano & Paolacci, Gabriele & Vissers, Maarten, 2014. "The bias in the bias: Comparative optimism as a function of event social undesirability," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 229-244.
    2. Michael Rivera & Liangfei Qiu & Subodha Kumar & Tony Petrucci, 2021. "Are Traditional Performance Reviews Outdated? An Empirical Analysis on Continuous, Real-Time Feedback in the Workplace," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 517-540, June.
    3. Jeanne Logsdon & Karen Patterson, 2009. "Deception in Business Networks: Is It Easier to Lie Online?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(4), pages 537-549, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    360 Degree Feedback; Multi-Rater Feedback; Multi-Source Feedback; Performance Evaluation; HRM;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration
    • M12 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Personnel Management; Executives; Executive Compensation
    • P27 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist and Transition Economies - - - Performance and Prospects
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hur:ijarbs:v:6:y:2016:i:5:p:172-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Hassan Danial Aslam (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://hrmars.com/index.php/pages/detail/IJARBSS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.