IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cbu/jrnlec/y2024v4p147-155.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modern Challenges To The Management Of Public Institutions. The Influence Of Appreciation On Institutional Dynamics, With A Focus On Military Organizations

Author

Listed:
  • MARIUS-EMANUEL CARAGEA

    (DOCTORAL SCHOOL OF ECONOMIC SCIENCES EUGENIU CARADA, UNIVERSITY OF CRAIOVA, CRAIOVA, ROMANIA)

Abstract

The modernization of the management of public institutions faces difficulties on different leves, first one being that most of the strategic management studies are done on private firms. The private and public sector differ vastly. The first one is motivated by profit, competitiveness, growth and does not face the same challenges as the later, such as heightened public scrutiny, demands of transparency and a sense of entitlement from the public. As such, it is demanding to apply the same strategies used in the private sector to the public sector. The present article proposes the exploration of an appraisal system as a key strategy for improving the management of public institutions. In it’s self, an appraisal relies on first acknowledging one’s contribution, second, underlining the value of said contribution. By appreciating employees’ work we can encourage engagement, improve motivation, uplift performance, mediate a better relationship between the appraiser and the appraisee. Understanding the benefits of the appraisal on a basic level highlights it’s importance in obtaining an improved organizational dynamic in public institutions. Applying such a strategy into the management of public organizations can be quite challenging, with it being more so in regard to military institutions that rely heavily on hierarchy and discipline, in which employees are required to follow orders, thus diminishing their sense of a worthy input.

Suggested Citation

  • Marius-Emanuel Caragea, 2024. "Modern Challenges To The Management Of Public Institutions. The Influence Of Appreciation On Institutional Dynamics, With A Focus On Military Organizations," Annals - Economy Series, Constantin Brancusi University, Faculty of Economics, vol. 4, pages 147-155, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2024:v:4:p:147-155
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.utgjiu.ro/revista/ec/pdf/2024-04/15_Caragea.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ece Kuzulu Kanaslan & Cemal Iyem, 2016. "Is 360 Degree Feedback Appraisal an Effective Way of Performance Evaluation?," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 6(5), pages 172-182, May.
    2. Ekin Ilseven & Phanish Puranam, 2021. "Measuring organizational resilience as a performance outcome," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 10(3), pages 127-137, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tapio Riepponen & Mikko Moilanen & Jaakko Simonen, 2023. "Themes of resilience in the economics literature: A topic modeling approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(2), pages 326-356, April.
    2. Samantha Shewchuk & James Wallace & Mia Seibold, 2023. "Evaluations of training programs to improve capacity in K*: a systematic scoping review of methods applied and outcomes assessed," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Yasuda, Hiroki, 2023. "Employers’ stereotypes and taste-based discrimination," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cbu:jrnlec:y:2024:v:4:p:147-155. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ecobici Nicolae (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fetgjro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.