IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hin/complx/5409405.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Large Group Decision-Making Approach Based on Stochastic MULTIMOORA: An Application of Doctor Evaluation in Healthcare Service

Author

Listed:
  • Yuxuan Gao
  • Yueping Du
  • Haiming Liang
  • Bingzhen Sun

Abstract

Purpose. This paper presents a new method and model based on stochastic MULTIMOORA method and discuss its application to the doctor evaluation in healthcare service. Design/Methodology/Approach . In the previous studies, the number of decision group is often assumed to be small, and the different dimensions of the evaluation indexes were also less. In this paper, the authors study how to evaluate the healthcare service quality of doctors by the large group. Based on the stochastic MULTIMOORA theory, the authors use the method that builds the function of the net probability, the distance between the ideal solutions, and the utility of each doctor. Findings. This paper presents a novel model to determine the optimal doctor that considers both two dimensions in the index system and balances the evaluation results of the two dimensions. The authors designed the questionnaire and conducted field survey to make the proposed method closer to the actual situation in China. Then, they determined the optimal evaluation result for the healthcare service quality of doctors. Research Limitations/Implications. In the process of practical decision-making, there are differences in intellectual literacy level, regional background, and language preference between different decision-makers. it is impossible for the method we proposed to consider the differentiation index system of decision-makers’ preference comprehensively. And this will be a further research direction. Practical Implications. The authors proposed two evaluation index dimensions and tryed to balance the evaluation results of the two dimensions as much as possible. Meanwhile, the information aggregation method based on stochastic MULTIMOORA is distinguished. Social Implications. The proposed method can be applied to the evaluation of doctors in actual healthcare service. It is helpful to improve the healthcare service quality and the hospital management level, further improve the core competition of hospitals Originality/Value. This paper makes up for the lack of existing studies of the large group evaluation decision in the healthcare service. A new method on the evaluation of doctors by the large group is established and applied to a healthcare management decision-making problem with Chinese characteristics in reality.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuxuan Gao & Yueping Du & Haiming Liang & Bingzhen Sun, 2018. "Large Group Decision-Making Approach Based on Stochastic MULTIMOORA: An Application of Doctor Evaluation in Healthcare Service," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:hin:complx:5409405
    DOI: 10.1155/2018/5409405
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/8503/2018/5409405.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://downloads.hindawi.com/journals/8503/2018/5409405.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2018/5409405?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Abbas Mardani & Mehrbakhsh Nilashi & Jurgita Antucheviciene & Madjid Tavana & Romualdas Bausys & Othman Ibrahim, 2017. "Recent Fuzzy Generalisations of Rough Sets Theory: A Systematic Review and Methodological Critique of the Literature," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-33, October.
    2. Sun, Bingzhen & Ma, Weimin, 2015. "An approach to consensus measurement of linguistic preference relations in multi-attribute group decision making and application," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 83-92.
    3. Zheng Xie & Jianping Li & Miao Li, 2018. "Exploring Cooperative Game Mechanisms of Scientific Coauthorship Networks," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-11, July.
    4. Junhai Ma & Lijian Sun & Xueli Zhan, 2017. "Study on Triopoly Dynamic Game Model Based on Different Demand Forecast Methods in the Market," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, July.
    5. Omid Solaymani Fard & Mohadeseh Ramezanzadeh, 2017. "On Fuzzy Portfolio Selection Problems: A Parametric Representation Approach," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mingwei Wang & Decui Liang & Wen Cao & Yuanyuan Fu, 2024. "Physician recommendation via online and offline social network group decision making with cross-network uncertain trust propagation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(1), pages 583-619, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gong, Zaiwu & Guo, Weiwei & Słowiński, Roman, 2021. "Transaction and interaction behavior-based consensus model and its application to optimal carbon emission reduction," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    2. Jorge L. García-Alcaraz & Aidé A. Maldonado-Macías & Juan L. Hernández-Arellano & Julio Blanco-Fernández & Emilio Jiménez-Macías & Juan C. Sáenz-Díez Muro, 2016. "Agricultural Tractor Selection: A Hybrid and Multi-Attribute Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Zhang, Hengjie & Dong, Yucheng & Chiclana, Francisco & Yu, Shui, 2019. "Consensus efficiency in group decision making: A comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 580-598.
    4. Triantaphyllou, Evangelos & Yanase, Juri & Hou, Fujun, 2020. "Post-consensus analysis of group decision making processes by means of a graph theoretic and an association rules mining approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Xunjie Gou & Zeshui Xu, 2017. "Exponential operations for intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and interval numbers in multi-attribute decision making," Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 183-204, June.
    6. Pinto, F.S. & Costa, A.S. & Figueira, J.R. & Marques, R.C., 2017. "The quality of service: An overall performance assessment for water utilities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 115-125.
    7. Xuanpeng Yin & Xuanhua Xu & Xiaohong Chen, 2020. "Risk mechanisms of large group emergency decision-making based on multi-agent simulation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(1), pages 1009-1034, August.
    8. Dong, Yucheng & Liu, Yating & Liang, Haiming & Chiclana, Francisco & Herrera-Viedma, Enrique, 2018. "Strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 154-164.
    9. Bowen Zhang & Yucheng Dong & Enrique Herrera-Viedma, 2019. "Group Decision Making with Heterogeneous Preference Structures: An Automatic Mechanism to Support Consensus Reaching," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 585-617, June.
    10. Ming-Chao Wang & Ja-Shen Chen, 2022. "Driving coopetition strategy to service innovation: the moderating role of coopetition recognition," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1471-1501, July.
    11. Ravil I. Mukhamediev & Yelena Popova & Yan Kuchin & Elena Zaitseva & Almas Kalimoldayev & Adilkhan Symagulov & Vitaly Levashenko & Farida Abdoldina & Viktors Gopejenko & Kirill Yakunin & Elena Muhamed, 2022. "Review of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Technologies: Classification, Restrictions, Opportunities and Challenges," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(15), pages 1-25, July.
    12. Mingwei Wang & Decui Liang & Zeshui Xu & Wen Cao, 2022. "Consensus reaching with the externality effect of social network for three-way group decisions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 707-745, August.
    13. Rezaei, Jafar, 2016. "Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: Some properties and a linear model," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 126-130.
    14. Meng, Fanyong & Tan, Chunqiao & Chen, Xiaohong, 2017. "Multiplicative consistency analysis for interval fuzzy preference relations: A comparative study," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 17-38.
    15. Oliva, Gabriele & Scala, Antonio & Setola, Roberto & Dell’Olmo, Paolo, 2019. "Opinion-based optimal group formation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 164-176.
    16. Yan, Hong-Bin & Ma, Tieju & Huynh, Van-Nam, 2017. "On qualitative multi-attribute group decision making and its consensus measure: A probability based perspective," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 94-117.
    17. Yakubu, Hanan & Kwong, C.K., 2021. "Forecasting the importance of product attributes using online customer reviews and Google Trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    18. González-Pachón, Jacinto & Romero, Carlos, 2016. "Bentham, Marx and Rawls ethical principles: In search for a compromise," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 47-51.
    19. Li, Yanhong & Kou, Gang & Li, Guangxu & Peng, Yi, 2022. "Consensus reaching process in large-scale group decision making based on bounded confidence and social network," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 790-802.
    20. Xie, Zheng, 2020. "Predicting the number of coauthors for researchers: A learning model," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(2).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hin:complx:5409405. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mohamed Abdelhakeem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.hindawi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.