IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i2p269-d90366.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantifying a Financially Sustainable Strategy of Public Transport: Private Capital Investment Considering Passenger Value

Author

Listed:
  • Yunqiang Xue

    (College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Beijing Collaborative Innovation Center for Metropolitan Transportation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Hongzhi Guan

    (College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
    Beijing Collaborative Innovation Center for Metropolitan Transportation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Jonathan Corey

    (ART-Engines Transportation Research Lab, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA)

  • Heng Wei

    (ART-Engines Transportation Research Lab, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45220, USA)

  • Hai Yan

    (Beijing Collaborative Innovation Center for Metropolitan Transportation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

Abstract

Releaving traffic congestion by developing public transport as an alternative mode of travel is a common practice all over the world. However, the increasing public transport subsidies have created a financial burden for governments. Encouragingly, private capital supplies an opportunity for public transport in sustainable finance. Previous research mainly focuses on qualitative analysis and money-for-value (MFV) analysis. In this paper, a new investment model is proposed based on the concept ‘passenger value’, and a bi-level programming model (BLPM) is constructed as a quantitative analysis tool. The upper target of BLPM is the total surplus (including the value of time (VOT) of passengers) of the public transport system and the upper constraint is the ticket price. The lower target of BLPM is passenger’s surplus, the lower constraints are service capability and the lowest return rate of the private sector. The public transport of Jinan City, China is taken as a case to quantify the impacts of private capital investment in public transport. Results show that the proposed investment model considering passenger value is superior to the traditional one, and effective private capital investment could increase the total societal benefit of the transportation system. The proposed investment strategy satisfies economic viability and is a financially sustainability strategy. Additionally, travelers should be encouraged to use public transport through improving the service quality and passenger returns. Only in this way can the success rate of the private sector investment in public transport be improved efficiently.

Suggested Citation

  • Yunqiang Xue & Hongzhi Guan & Jonathan Corey & Heng Wei & Hai Yan, 2017. "Quantifying a Financially Sustainable Strategy of Public Transport: Private Capital Investment Considering Passenger Value," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:269-:d:90366
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/269/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/269/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stef Proost & Fay Dunkerley & Saskia Loo & Nicole Adler & Johannes Bröcker & Artem Korzhenevych, 2014. "Do the selected Trans European transport investments pass the cost benefit test?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 107-132, January.
    2. Ignacio De Los Ríos-Carmenado & Mauricio Ortuño & María Rivera, 2016. "Private–Public Partnership as a Tool to Promote Entrepreneurship for Sustainable Development: WWP Torrearte Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Percoco, Marco, 2014. "Quality of institutions and private participation in transport infrastructure investment: Evidence from developing countries," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 50-58.
    4. Wolfgang Ulaga & Samir Chacour, 2001. "Measuring Customer-Perceived Value in Business Markets: A Prerequisite for Marketing Strategy Development and Implementation," Post-Print hal-00485109, HAL.
    5. Train,Kenneth E., 2009. "Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521766555, September.
    6. Chang, Zheng, 2014. "Financing new metros—The Beijing metro financing sustainability study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 148-155.
    7. Marcel Paulssen & Dirk Temme & Akshay Vij & Joan Walker, 2014. "Values, attitudes and travel behavior: a hierarchical latent variable mixed logit model of travel mode choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(4), pages 873-888, July.
    8. Sergio Jara-Díaz & Antonio Gschwender & Meisy Ortega, 2014. "The impact of a financial constraint on the spatial structure of public transport services," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 21-36, January.
    9. Clifford Winston, 2000. "Government Failure in Urban Transportation," Fiscal Studies, Institute for Fiscal Studies, vol. 21(4), pages 403-425, December.
    10. Macário, Rosário, 2010. "Future challenges for transport infrastructure pricing in PPP arrangements," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(1), pages 145-154.
    11. Matsunaka, Ryoji & Oba, Tetsuharu & Nakagawa, Dai & Nagao, Motoya & Nawrocki, Justin, 2013. "International comparison of the relationship between urban structure and the service level of urban public transportation—A comprehensive analysis in local cities in Japan, France and Germany," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 26-39.
    12. Verhoef, Peter C. & Lemon, Katherine N., 2013. "Successful customer value management: Key lessons and emerging trends," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 1-15.
    13. Yang, Hai & Yan Kong, Hoi & Meng, Qiang, 2001. "Value-of-time distributions and competitive bus services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 411-424, December.
    14. Benoît Colson & Patrice Marcotte & Gilles Savard, 2007. "An overview of bilevel optimization," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 235-256, September.
    15. Gerpott, Torsten J. & Rams, Wolfgang & Schindler, Andreas, 2001. "Customer retention, loyalty, and satisfaction in the German mobile cellular telecommunications market," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(4), pages 249-269, May.
    16. Carlos Oliveira Cruz & Rui Cunha Marques, 2013. "Infrastructure Public-Private Partnerships," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-36910-0, December.
    17. Yang, Hai & Bell, Michael G. H., 2001. "Transport bilevel programming problems: recent methodological advances," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 1-4, January.
    18. Niek Mouter & Jan Annema & Bert Wee, 2015. "Managing the insolvable limitations of cost-benefit analysis: results of an interview based study," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 277-302, March.
    19. Wong, W. G. & Han, B. M. & Ferreira, L. & Zhu, X. N. & Sun, Q. X., 2002. "Evaluation of management strategies for the operation of high-speed railways in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 277-289, March.
    20. Guohui Zhang & Zhong Wang & Khali Persad & C. Walton, 2014. "Enhanced traffic information dissemination to facilitate toll road utilization: a nested logit model of a stated preference survey in Texas," Transportation, Springer, vol. 41(2), pages 231-249, March.
    21. Costa, Álvaro & Fernandes, Ruben, 2012. "Urban public transport in Europe: Technology diffusion and market organisation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 269-284.
    22. Chou, Jui-Sheng & Yeh, Chun-Pin, 2013. "Influential constructs, mediating effects, and moderating effects on operations performance of high speed rail from passenger perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 207-219.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cavallaro, Federico & Nocera, Silvio, 2023. "Flexible-route integrated passenger–freight transport in rural areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    2. Han, Yan & Zhang, Tiantian & Wang, Meng, 2020. "Holiday travel behavior analysis and empirical study with Integrated Travel Reservation Information usage," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 130-151.
    3. Shiqian Ji & Jiaming Zhong & Zhaocheng He, 2022. "A Bus Subsidy Scheme Design Model Considering Competition between Bus Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-19, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yunqiang Xue & Hongzhi Guan & Jonathan Corey & Bing Zhang & Hai Yan & Yan Han & Huanmei Qin, 2017. "Transport Emissions and Energy Consumption Impacts of Private Capital Investment in Public Transport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Kim, Seheon & Rasouli, Soora, 2022. "The influence of latent lifestyle on acceptance of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS): A hierarchical latent variable and latent class approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 304-319.
    3. Risius, Antje & Hamm, Ulrich, 2017. "Consumer segmentation based on attitudes - Does information change it all?," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258328, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    4. Bouscasse, H., 2018. "Integrated choice and latent variable models: A literature review on mode choice," Working Papers 2018-07, Grenoble Applied Economics Laboratory (GAEL).
    5. Schmid, Basil & Becker, Felix & Axhausen, Kay W. & Widmer, Paul & Stein, Petra, 2023. "A simultaneous model of residential location, mobility tool ownership and mode choice using latent variables," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    6. Varun Raturi & Ashish Verma, 2019. "Competition between High Speed Rail and Conventional Transport Modes: Market Entry Game Analysis on Indian Corridors," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 763-790, September.
    7. Sanjana Hossain & Md. Sami Hasnine & Khandker Nurul Habib, 2021. "A latent class joint mode and departure time choice model for the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(3), pages 1217-1239, June.
    8. Tran, Yen & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki & Sato, Hitomi & Miwa, Tomio & Morikawa, Takayuki, 2020. "The analysis of influences of attitudes on mode choice under highly unbalanced mode share patterns," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 36(C).
    9. Luis Márquez & Víctor Cantillo & Julián Arellana, 2020. "Assessing the influence of indicators’ complexity on hybrid discrete choice model estimates," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 373-396, February.
    10. Mouter, Niek & Cabral, Manuel Ojeda & Dekker, Thijs & van Cranenburgh, Sander, 2019. "The value of travel time, noise pollution, recreation and biodiversity: A social choice valuation perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    11. João M. Pinto & Mário Coutinho dos Santos & Pedro Verga Matos, 2021. "Contracting Out Public Transit Services: An Incentive Performance-Based Approach," Working Papers de Economia (Economics Working Papers) 02, Católica Porto Business School, Universidade Católica Portuguesa.
    12. Yuan, Yali & Yang, Xiaobao & Zhang, Junyi & Song, Dongdong & Yue, Xianfei, 2024. "Adaptive behavior of intercity travelers within urban agglomeration in response to adverse weather: Accounting for multilayer unobserved heterogeneity," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 141-158.
    13. Jia Guo & Tao Feng & Harry J. P. Timmermans, 2020. "Modeling co-dependent choice of workplace, residence and commuting mode using an error component mixed logit model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 911-933, April.
    14. Hélène Bouscasse, 2018. "Integrated choice and latent variable models: A literature review on mode choice," Working Papers hal-01795630, HAL.
    15. Confraria, João & Ribeiro, Tiago & Vasconcelos, Helder, 2017. "Analysis of consumer preferences for mobile telecom plans using a discrete choice experiment," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 157-169.
    16. Wang, Guangmin & Gao, Ziyou & Xu, Meng, 2019. "Integrating link-based discrete credit charging scheme into discrete network design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 272(1), pages 176-187.
    17. Lahoz, Lorena Torres & Pereira, Francisco Camara & Sfeir, Georges & Arkoudi, Ioanna & Monteiro, Mayara Moraes & Azevedo, Carlos Lima, 2023. "Attitudes and Latent Class Choice Models using Machine Learning," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    18. Lingjuan Chen & Yijing Zhao & Zupeng Liu & Xinran Yang, 2022. "Construction of Commuters’ Multi-Mode Choice Model Based on Public Transport Operation Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Tran, Yen & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki & Sato, Hitomi, 2020. "The influences of environmentalism and attitude towards physical activity on mode choice: The new evidences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 211-226.
    20. Basil Schmid & Milos Balac & Kay W. Axhausen, 2019. "Post-Car World: data collection methods and response behavior in a multi-stage travel survey," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(2), pages 425-492, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:269-:d:90366. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.