IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i3p260-d65519.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Process Performance by Application of Six Sigma Concepts: The Research Study of Two Industrial Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Sujova

    (Department of Business Economics, Technical university in Zvolen, T.G.Masaryka 24, 96053 Zvolen, Slovakia)

  • Lubica Simanova

    (Department of Business Economics, Technical university in Zvolen, T.G.Masaryka 24, 96053 Zvolen, Slovakia)

  • Katarina Marcinekova

    (Department of Business Economics, Technical university in Zvolen, T.G.Masaryka 24, 96053 Zvolen, Slovakia)

Abstract

The current approach to business management focuses on increasing the performance of business processes. To achieve the required processes performance means to ensure the required quality and capability of processes. The partial aim of this paper is to confirm the positive effects of the Six Sigma methodology (SSM) on the corporate performance in the Slovak Republic and an investigation of the dependency of SSM implementation on the certified quality management system (QMS) as a set-forward condition via a questionnaire survey carried out in Slovak industrial enterprises. The survey results confirmed the above-mentioned assumptions. The SSM using DMAIC (Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control) was applied in real conditions of two manufacturing enterprises with a different level of quality management system. The results of the research study proved a possibility to implement SSM and to use the same methods in enterprises aside from a level of QMS. However, more remarkable results were achieved by the enterprise which introduced QMS. The first application of SSM in enterprises within specific conditions of furniture production processes can be considered to be a contribution of the research study, as well. The result of the work is the model including the methodology and the appropriate combination of methods and tools for assuring the sustainable performance of the business processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Sujova & Lubica Simanova & Katarina Marcinekova, 2016. "Sustainable Process Performance by Application of Six Sigma Concepts: The Research Study of Two Industrial Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-21, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:260-:d:65519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/260/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/260/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Arumugam, V. & Antony, Jiju & Kumar, Maneesh, 2013. "Linking learning and knowledge creation to project success in Six Sigma projects: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(1), pages 388-402.
    2. Boon Sin, Ang & Zailani, Suhaiza & Iranmanesh, Mohammad & Ramayah, T., 2015. "Structural equation modelling on knowledge creation in Six Sigma DMAIC project and its impact on organizational performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 105-117.
    3. Andrea Chiarini, 2013. "A comparison between companies' implementation of Six Sigma and ISO 13053 requirements: a first investigation from Europe," International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(2), pages 154-172.
    4. Ümit Kuvvetli & Ali Rıza Firuzan & Süleyman Alpaykut & Atakan Gerger, 2016. "Determining Six Sigma success factors in Turkey by using structural equation modeling," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(4), pages 738-753, March.
    5. Andrea Chiarini, 2013. "Relationships between total quality management and Six Sigma inside European manufacturing companies: a dedicated survey," International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 179-194.
    6. Nourelfath, Mustapha & Hassan, Jawad, 2015. "Six Sigma performance for non-normal processesAuthor-Name: Aldowaisan, Tariq," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 968-977.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Justyna Lemke & Kinga Kijewska & Stanisław Iwan & Tomasz Dudek, 2021. "Six Sigma in Urban Logistics Management—A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Yung-Tsan Jou & Riana Magdalena Silitonga & Ming-Chang Lin & Ronald Sukwadi & Jovian Rivaldo, 2022. "Application of Six Sigma Methodology in an Automotive Manufacturing Company: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Mohammed Alshamlan & Aos Alzahrani & Musaad BinYousef & Abdelhakim Abdelhadi & Khaled Akkad & Rakan Alyamani, 2022. "Optimization for Sustainable Train Shunting Services Using DMAIC Cycle," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-13, February.
    4. Flavia Fechete & Anisor Nedelcu, 2019. "Performance Management Assessment Model for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jorge L. García-Alcaraz & Liliana Avelar-Sosa & Juan I. Latorre-Biel & Emilio Jiménez-Macías & Giner Alor-Hernández, 2017. "Role of Human Knowledge and Communication on Operational Benefits Gained from Six Sigma," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-19, September.
    2. Jana Fabianová & Jaroslava Janeková & Daniela Onofrejová, 2017. "Cost Analysis of Poor Quality Using a Software Simulation," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(44), pages 181-181, February.
    3. Knoppen, Desirée & Sáenz, María Jesús, 2017. "Interorganizational teams in low-versus high-dependence contexts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 15-25.
    4. Yuzhakov, Vladimir (Южаков, Владимир) & Startsev, Y (Старцев, Я.), 2015. "Development of a Concept of an Interdisciplinary Research Program of Formation of Complex Methodologies and Techniques of Management Development in Public Administration [Разработка Концепции Межди," Published Papers mn37, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    5. Yee, Rachel W.Y. & Guo, Yujuan & Yeung, Andy C.L., 2015. "Being close or being happy? The relative impact of work relationship and job satisfaction on service quality," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 391-400.
    6. Boon Sin, Ang & Zailani, Suhaiza & Iranmanesh, Mohammad & Ramayah, T., 2015. "Structural equation modelling on knowledge creation in Six Sigma DMAIC project and its impact on organizational performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 105-117.
    7. Effrosyni Taraza & Sofia Anastasiadou & Andreas Masouras & Christos Papademetriou, 2023. "Sustainable Development and Implementation of Quality Management Excellence Models in Public Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    8. Fabiane Letícia Lizarelli & Jiju Antony & José Carlos Toledo, 2020. "Statistical thinking and its impact on operational performance in manufacturing companies: an empirical study," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 295(2), pages 923-950, December.
    9. Lepore, A. & Palumbo, B. & Castagliola, P., 2018. "A note on decision making method for product acceptance based on process capability indices Cpk and Cpmk," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 267(1), pages 393-398.
    10. Awe, Olajumoke A. & Woodside, Arch G. & Nerur, Sridhar & Prater, Edmund, 2020. "Capturing heterogeneities in orchestrating resources for accurately forecasting high (separately low) project management performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    11. Jorge Luis García-Alcaraz & Giner Alor-Hernández & Cuauhtémoc Sánchez-Ramírez & Emilio Jiménez-Macías & Julio Blanco-Fernández & Juan I. Latorre-Biel, 2018. "Mediating Role of the Six Sigma Implementation Strategy and Investment in Human Resources in Economic Success and Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-21, June.
    12. Amrik Sohal & Tharaka Vass & Tristan Vasquez & Greg J. Bamber & Timothy Bartram & Pauline Stanton, 2022. "Success factors for lean six sigma projects in healthcare," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 215-240, June.
    13. CHEN, Piao & YE, Zhi-Sheng, 2018. "A systematic look at the gamma process capability indices," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 589-597.
    14. Mustapha Nourelfath & Tariq Aldowaisan & Jawad Hassan, 2016. "Evaluating Six Sigma failure rate for inverse Gaussian cycle times," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(20), pages 6092-6101, October.
    15. Hamed Gholami & Norhazrina Jamil & Muhamad Zameri Mat Saman & Dalia Streimikiene & Safian Sharif & Norhayati Zakuan, 2021. "The application of Green Lean Six Sigma," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1913-1931, May.
    16. Bo Zhang & Zhanwen Niu & Chaochao Liu, 2020. "Lean Tools, Knowledge Management, and Lean Sustainability: The Moderating Effects of Study Conventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, January.
    17. L. M. Daphne Yiu & Hugo K. S. Lam & Andy C. L. Yeung & T. C. E. Cheng, 2020. "Enhancing the Financial Returns of R&D Investments through Operations Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(7), pages 1658-1678, July.
    18. Katharina E. Roche & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2024. "Development of a strategy deployment framework combining corporate sustainability and operational excellence," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2159-2174, May.
    19. Yang, Yefei & Lee, Peter K.C. & Cheng, T.C. Edwin, 2017. "Leveraging selected operational improvement practices to achieve both efficiency and creativity: A multi-level study in frontline service operations," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 298-310.
    20. Andrea Chiarini, 2014. "Strategies for Developing an Environmentally Sustainable Supply Chain: Differences Between Manufacturing and Service Sectors," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(7), pages 493-504, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:260-:d:65519. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.