IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v8y2016i3p216-d64655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Rethinking of the Production Approach in IPCC: Its Objectiveness in China

Author

Listed:
  • Hongqiang Yang

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    Center for the Yangtze River Delta’s Socioeconomic Development, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China
    Research Center for Economics and Trade in Forest Products of the State Forestry Administration, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Xiaobiao Zhang

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
    Research Center for Economics and Trade in Forest Products of the State Forestry Administration, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

The trade of harvested wood products (HWPs) and their feedstock increasingly affects the dynamics of the complete national HWP carbon pool ignored by the Production Approach (PA), the current universal method, proposed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Existing research also overlooks the inherent factors that lead to the non-objectiveness of PA that affects the potential carbon trade and the sustainable use of forestry resources. This study aimed to investigate such inherent factors through a deductive derivation of PA and the Stock-Change Approach (SCA), based on which an empirical study on China was conducted to rethink the objectiveness of PA in the complete national HWP carbon pool. The deductive derivation indicated that the inherent factors rely on the balance between coefficients that describe the relationship between HWP trade and production and the relationship between the corresponding feedstock trade and production. The empirical study further illustrated that the dynamics of balance between coefficients negatively influence the objectiveness of PA. The absolute objectiveness of this approach was constantly weakened in the past 55 years and may potentially occur yet again in the future despite an improvement in its annual relative objectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Hongqiang Yang & Xiaobiao Zhang, 2016. "A Rethinking of the Production Approach in IPCC: Its Objectiveness in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:216-:d:64655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/216/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/8/3/216/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 2014. "Method for mapping innovation ecosystems," Chapters, in: Mapping National Innovation Ecosystems, chapter 2, pages 32-41, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems (WLE)., 2014. "Ecosystem services and resilience framework," IWMI Books, Reports H046683, International Water Management Institute.
    3. ., 2014. "The system of the cities," Chapters, in: China’s Urbanization and the World Economy, chapter 9, pages 88-100, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. ., 2014. "The innovation ecosystem in Shanghai, China," Chapters, in: Mapping National Innovation Ecosystems, chapter 9, pages 164-190, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. ., 2014. "The Singaporean national innovation ecosystem," Chapters, in: Mapping National Innovation Ecosystems, chapter 10, pages 191-209, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. ., 2014. "The Israeli national innovation ecosystem," Chapters, in: Mapping National Innovation Ecosystems, chapter 3, pages 42-63, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    7. ., 2014. "The French national innovation ecosystem," Chapters, in: Mapping National Innovation Ecosystems, chapter 6, pages 104-118, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Asante, Patrick & Armstrong, Glen W., 2012. "Optimal forest harvest age considering carbon sequestration in multiple carbon pools: A comparative statics analysis," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 145-156.
    9. ., 2014. "The Polish national innovation ecosystem," Chapters, in: Mapping National Innovation Ecosystems, chapter 4, pages 64-82, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Kim Pingoud & Fabian Wagner, 2006. "Methane Emissions from Landfills and Carbon Dynamics of Harvested Wood Products: The First-Order Decay Revisited," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 11(5), pages 961-978, September.
    11. ., 2014. "The Spanish national innovation ecosystem," Chapters, in: Mapping National Innovation Ecosystems, chapter 7, pages 119-138, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. ., 2014. "Towards a national innovation system," Chapters, in: Mapping National Innovation Ecosystems, chapter 1, pages 9-31, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chunyi Ji & Wenbin Cao & Yong Chen & Hongqiang Yang, 2016. "Carbon Balance and Contribution of Harvested Wood Products in China Based on the Production Approach of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-10, November.
    2. Zhang, Xiaobiao & Yang, Hongqiang & Chen, Jiaxin, 2018. "Life-cycle carbon budget of China's harvested wood products in 1900–2015," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 181-192.
    3. Luyang Zhang & Yankun Sun & Tianyuan Song & Jiaqi Xu, 2019. "Harvested Wood Products as a Carbon Sink in China, 1900–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-13, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mateo-Babiano, Iderlina & Bean, Richard & Corcoran, Jonathan & Pojani, Dorina, 2016. "How does our natural and built environment affect the use of bicycle sharing?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 295-307.
    2. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Mohammadi, Mehrdad & Gendreau, Michel & Pirayesh, Amir & Ghasemaghaei, Ali & Salehi, Vahid, 2022. "Hazardous material transportation problems: A comprehensive overview of models and solution approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(1), pages 1-38.
    3. Lara-Pulido, José Alberto & Guevara-Sanginés, Alejandro & Arias Martelo, Camilo, 2018. "A meta-analysis of economic valuation of ecosystem services in Mexico," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 31(PA), pages 126-141.
    4. An, Hyunjin, 2017. "Forest Carbon Sequestration And Optimal Harvesting Decision Considering Southern Pine Beetle (Spb) Disturbance: A Real Option Approach," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 40(Special, ), December.
    5. Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Nghiem, Nhung, 2016. "Optimal forest rotation for carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation by farm income levels," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 185-194.
    6. Wang, Shuaian & Qu, Xiaobo & Yang, Ying, 2015. "Estimation of the perceived value of transit time for containerized cargoes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 298-308.
    7. Noruzoliaee, Mohamadhossein & Zou, Bo & Zhou, Yan (Joann), 2021. "Truck platooning in the U.S. national road network: A system-level modeling approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    8. Xie, Yalin & Lei, Xiangdong & Shi, Jingning, 2020. "Impacts of climate change on biological rotation of Larix olgensis plantations for timber production and carbon storage in northeast China using the 3-PGmix model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 435(C).
    9. Rørstad, Per Kristian, 2022. "Payment for CO2 sequestration affects the Faustmann rotation period in Norway more than albedo payment does," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    10. Ming, Tingzhen & Wu, Yongjia & de_Richter, Renaud K. & Liu, Wei & Sherif, S.A., 2017. "Solar updraft power plant system: A brief review and a case study on a new system with radial partition walls in its collector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 472-487.
    11. Chen, Si & Shahi, Chander & Chen, Han Y.H. & Kumar, Praveen & Ma, Zilong & McLaren, Brian, 2018. "Trade-offs and Synergies Between Economic Gains and Plant Diversity Across a Range of Management Alternatives in Boreal Forests," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 162-172.
    12. Labaka, Leire & Hernantes, Josune & Sarriegi, Jose M., 2015. "Resilience framework for critical infrastructures: An empirical study in a nuclear plant," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 92-105.
    13. Hoel, Michael & Holtsmark, Bjart & Holtsmark, Katinka, 2014. "Faustmann and the climate," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 192-210.
    14. Holtsmark, Bjart & Hoel, Michael & Holtsmark, Katinka, 2013. "Optimal harvest age considering multiple carbon pools – A comment," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 87-95.
    15. Hubert Paluš & Ján Parobek & Martin Moravčík & Miroslav Kovalčík & Michal Dzian & Vlastimil Murgaš, 2020. "Projecting Climate Change Potential of Harvested Wood Products under Different Scenarios of Wood Production and Utilization: Study of Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Yu, Jinna & Yao, Shunbo & Zhang, Bisheng, 2014. "Designing afforestation subsidies that account for the benefits of carbon sequestration: A case study using data from China's Loess Plateau," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 65-76.
    17. Stella Apostolaki & Ebun Akinsete & Phoebe Koundouri & Panagiotis Samartzis, 2019. "Freshwater: The importance of freshwater for providing ecosystem services," DEOS Working Papers 1905, Athens University of Economics and Business.
    18. R. Quentin Grafton & Mahala McLindin & Karen Hussey & Paul Wyrwoll & Dennis Wichelns & Claudia Ringler & Dustin Garrick & Jamie Pittock & Sarah Wheeler & Stuart Orr & Nathanial Matthews & Erik Ansink , 2016. "Responding to Global Challenges in Food, Energy, Environment and Water: Risks and Options Assessment for Decision-Making," Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 3(2), pages 275-299, May.
    19. Susaeta, Andres & Chang, Sun Joseph & Carter, Douglas R. & Lal, Pankaj, 2014. "Economics of carbon sequestration under fluctuating economic environment, forest management and technological changes: An application to forest stands in the southern United States," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 47-64.
    20. Braun, Martin & Winner, Georg & Schwarzbauer, Peter & Stern, Tobias, 2016. "Apparent Half-Life-Dynamics of Harvested Wood Products (HWPs) in Austria: Development and analysis of weighted time-series for 2002 to 2011," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 28-34.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:8:y:2016:i:3:p:216-:d:64655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.