IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/ecomod/v435y2020ics0304380020303379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of climate change on biological rotation of Larix olgensis plantations for timber production and carbon storage in northeast China using the 3-PGmix model

Author

Listed:
  • Xie, Yalin
  • Lei, Xiangdong
  • Shi, Jingning

Abstract

Biological rotation length is a key parameter of even-aged forest management. Future climate change is expected to affect forest growth and thus modify biological rotation age, but knowledge about the effect of climate change on the rotation for both timber production and carbon storage remains limited from process-based growth model. The biological rotation age (BRA) of Larix olgensis plantations in China is technically set for 40 years according to the principle of maximizing timber production, and it is necessary to further examine the BRA with consideration of site quality differences and climate change. On the basis of 164 sample plots from the National Forest Inventory across the Jilin Province, Northeast China, we use the process-based model 3-PGmix to simulate the change of the BRA of Larix olgensis plantations for timber production and carbon storage under climate change. Different climate scenarios are investigated across different site productivity levels. Under the current climate scenario, the BRAs for timber production and carbon storage are approximately 23.8–41.5 years and 25.0–46.4 years, respectively. The BRAs are reduced by 2–9 years under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 climate scenarios. The BRA modification by climate change was site-dependent, and stands with good productivity sites led to shorter BRAs than those with poor productivity sites. The 3-PGmix model effectively simulates the dynamic change of stand volume and biomass for larch plantations. Future climate change with rising temperature, increased precipitation and elevated CO2 concertration is conducive to the growth of stand volume and carbon storage in the order of RCP 8.5 > RCP 4.5 > current. Results can provide scientific implications for adaptive management of Larix olgensis plantations, and shorter biological rotation is suggested for rotation modification under the future climate change in the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Xie, Yalin & Lei, Xiangdong & Shi, Jingning, 2020. "Impacts of climate change on biological rotation of Larix olgensis plantations for timber production and carbon storage in northeast China using the 3-PGmix model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 435(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:435:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020303379
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304380020303379
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2020.109267?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Claudio O. Stöckle & Stewart Higgins & Roger Nelson & John Abatzoglou & Dave Huggins & William Pan & Tina Karimi & John Antle & Sanford D. Eigenbrode & Erin Brooks, 2018. "Evaluating opportunities for an increased role of winter crops as adaptation to climate change in dryland cropping systems of the U.S. Inland Pacific Northwest," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 146(1), pages 247-261, January.
    2. Claudia Tebaldi & Bruno Sansó, 2009. "Joint projections of temperature and precipitation change from multiple climate models: a hierarchical Bayesian approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 172(1), pages 83-106, January.
    3. Vauhkonen, Jari & Packalen, Tuula, 2018. "Uncertainties related to climate change and forest management with implications on climate regulation in Finland," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(PB), pages 213-224.
    4. Gupta, Rajit & Sharma, Laxmi Kant, 2019. "The process-based forest growth model 3-PG for use in forest management: A review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 55-73.
    5. Olschewski, Roland & Benítez, Pablo C., 2010. "Optimizing joint production of timber and carbon sequestration of afforestation projects," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, January.
    6. Sousa-Silva, Rita & Verbist, Bruno & Lomba, Ângela & Valent, Peter & Suškevičs, Monika & Picard, Olivier & Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke A. & Cosofret, Vasile-Cosmin & Bouriaud, Laura & Ponette, Quentin & , 2018. "Adapting forest management to climate change in Europe: Linking perceptions to adaptive responses," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 22-30.
    7. Asante, Patrick & Armstrong, Glen W., 2012. "Optimal forest harvest age considering carbon sequestration in multiple carbon pools: A comparative statics analysis," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 145-156.
    8. Ekholm, Tommi, 2016. "Optimal forest rotation age under efficient climate change mitigation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 62-68.
    9. W. A. Kurz & C. C. Dymond & G. Stinson & G. J. Rampley & E. T. Neilson & A. L. Carroll & T. Ebata & L. Safranyik, 2008. "Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 452(7190), pages 987-990, April.
    10. Nghiem, Nhung, 2014. "Optimal rotation age for carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation in Vietnam," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 56-64.
    11. Christopher P. O. Reyer & Michael Flechsig & Petra Lasch-Born & Marcel Oijen, 2016. "Integrating parameter uncertainty of a process-based model in assessments of climate change effects on forest productivity," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 395-409, August.
    12. Belinda E. Medlyn & Remko A. Duursma & Melanie J. B. Zeppel, 2011. "Forest productivity under climate change: a checklist for evaluating model studies," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3), pages 332-355, May.
    13. Marielle Brunette & Nathalie Breda, 2019. "Are 40 years better than 55 ? An analysis of the reduction of forest rotation to face drought event in a Douglas fir stand," Post-Print hal-02118104, HAL.
    14. Forrester, David I. & Tang, Xiaolu, 2016. "Analysing the spatial and temporal dynamics of species interactions in mixed-species forests and the effects of stand density using the 3-PG model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 319(C), pages 233-254.
    15. Forrester, David I., 2014. "A stand-level light interception model for horizontally and vertically heterogeneous canopies," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 276(C), pages 14-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruiming Cheng & Jing Zhang & Xinyue Wang & Zhidong Zhang, 2022. "Growth Suitability Evaluation of Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr Based on Potential NPP under Different Climate Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen, Trung Thanh & Nghiem, Nhung, 2016. "Optimal forest rotation for carbon sequestration and biodiversity conservation by farm income levels," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 185-194.
    2. O’Donoghue, Cathal & O’Fatharta, Eoin & Geoghegan, Cathal & Ryan, Mary, 2024. "Farmland afforestation: Forest optimal rotation ages across discrete optimisation objectives," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    3. Thomas, J. & Brunette, M. & Leblois, A., 2022. "The determinants of adapting forest management practices to climate change: Lessons from a survey of French private forest owners," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    4. Nölte, Anja & Yousefpour, Rasoul & Hanewinkel, Marc, 2020. "Changes in sessile oak (Quercus petraea) productivity under climate change by improved leaf phenology in the 3-PG model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 438(C).
    5. Yu, Jinna & Yao, Shunbo & Zhang, Bisheng, 2014. "Designing afforestation subsidies that account for the benefits of carbon sequestration: A case study using data from China's Loess Plateau," Journal of Forest Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 65-76.
    6. Juutinen, Artti & Ahtikoski, Anssi & Lehtonen, Mika & Mäkipää, Raisa & Ollikainen, Markku, 2018. "The impact of a short-term carbon payment scheme on forest management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 115-127.
    7. M. Brunette & M. Hanewinkel & R. Yousefpour, 2020. "Risk aversion hinders forestry professionals to adapt to climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(4), pages 2157-2180, October.
    8. Julie Thomas & Marielle Brunette & Antoine Leblois, 2021. "Adapting forest management practices to climate change : Lessons from a survey of French private forest owners," Working Papers hal-03142772, HAL.
    9. Rahn, Eric & Vaast, Philippe & Läderach, Peter & van Asten, Piet & Jassogne, Laurence & Ghazoul, Jaboury, 2018. "Exploring adaptation strategies of coffee production to climate change using a process-based model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 371(C), pages 76-89.
    10. Pinnschmidt, Arne & Yousefpour, Rasoul & Nölte, Anja & Hanewinkel, Marc, 2023. "Tropical mixed-species plantations can outperform monocultures in terms of carbon sequestration and economic return," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    11. Lessa Derci Augustynczik, Andrey & Yousefpour, Rasoul, 2021. "Assessing the synergistic value of ecosystem services in European beech forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    12. Gupta, Rajit & Sharma, Laxmi Kant, 2019. "The process-based forest growth model 3-PG for use in forest management: A review," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 397(C), pages 55-73.
    13. Yu, Zhihan & Ning, Zhuo & Chang, Wei-Yew & Chang, Sun Joseph & Yang, Hongqiang, 2023. "Optimal harvest decisions for the management of carbon sequestration forests under price uncertainty and risk preferences," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    14. Barbosa, Lorena Oliveira & dos Santos, Juscelina Arcanjo & Gonçalves, Anny Francielly Ataide & Campoe, Otávio Camargo & Scolforo, José Roberto Soares & Scolforo, Henrique Ferraço, 2023. "Competition in forest plantations: Empirical and process-based modelling in pine and eucalypt plantations," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 483(C).
    15. Triviño, María & Juutinen, Artti & Mazziotta, Adriano & Miettinen, Kaisa & Podkopaev, Dmitry & Reunanen, Pasi & Mönkkönen, Mikko, 2015. "Managing a boreal forest landscape for providing timber, storing and sequestering carbon," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 179-189.
    16. An, Hyunjin, 2017. "Forest Carbon Sequestration And Optimal Harvesting Decision Considering Southern Pine Beetle (Spb) Disturbance: A Real Option Approach," Journal of Rural Development/Nongchon-Gyeongje, Korea Rural Economic Institute, vol. 40(Special, ), December.
    17. Brian Petersen & Diana Stuart, 2014. "Explanations of a Changing Landscape: A Critical Examination of the British Columbia Bark Beetle Epidemic," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 46(3), pages 598-613, March.
    18. Mathys, A.S. & Coops, N.C. & Simard, S.W. & Waring, R.H. & Aitken, S.N., 2018. "Diverging distribution of seedlings and mature trees reflects recent climate change in British Columbia," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 384(C), pages 145-153.
    19. Metsaranta, J.M. & Kurz, W.A., 2012. "Inter-annual variability of ecosystem production in boreal jack pine forests (1975–2004) estimated from tree-ring data using CBM-CFS3," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 224(1), pages 111-123.
    20. Christoph M. Buser & Hans R. Künsch & Alain Weber, 2010. "Biases and Uncertainty in Climate Projections," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 37(2), pages 179-199, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:ecomod:v:435:y:2020:i:c:s0304380020303379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/ecological-modelling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.