IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v2y2010i7p1991-2009d8876.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Impact of Land Use Policy on Urban-Rural Sustainability Using the FoPIA Approach in Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Author

Listed:
  • Hannes Jochen König

    (Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany)

  • Johannes Schuler

    (Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany)

  • Utia Suarma

    (Gadjah Mada University (GMU), Bulaksumur, Sekip Utara Jalan Kaliurang Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Desmond McNeill

    (Centre for Development and the Environment (SUM), University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1116, Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway)

  • Jacques Imbernon

    (Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement (CIRAD), Avenue Agropolis, 34398 Montpellier Cedex 5, France)

  • Frieta Damayanti

    (Gadjah Mada University (GMU), Bulaksumur, Sekip Utara Jalan Kaliurang Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Syarifah Aini Dalimunthe

    (Gadjah Mada University (GMU), Bulaksumur, Sekip Utara Jalan Kaliurang Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Sandra Uthes

    (Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany)

  • Junun Sartohadi

    (Gadjah Mada University (GMU), Bulaksumur, Sekip Utara Jalan Kaliurang Bulaksumur, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia)

  • Katharina Helming

    (Leibniz-Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany)

  • Jake Morris

    (Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Farnham, Surrey GU10 4LH, UK)

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a sustainability impact assessment (SIA) of policy induced land use changes in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. The regional problems include rapid expansions of urban areas, due to high population pressure, and the conversion of paddy fields and forests into settlements. The objective of this study was to assess the impacts of two land use policies on social, economic, and environmental Land Use Functions (LUFs) in Yogyakarta. The following scenarios were developed for the SIA: a forest protection scenario (S1), a paddy field conservation scenario (S2), and a counterfactual (no policy) scenario of ‘Business As Usual’ (BAU). The Framework for Participatory Impact Assessment (FoPIA) was applied to conduct an expert-based impact assessment. For the specification of the regional sustainability context, a set of nine key LUFs and associated indicators were developed, including three social, three economic, and three environmental sustainability criteria. The resulting scenario impacts of the assessment differed considerably, with positive impacts of the S1 and S2 scenarios on seven of nine LUFs, and negative impacts of the BAU scenario on six LUFs. The perception of the FoPIA method by the regional stakeholders was positive. We conclude that this method contributes toward an enhanced regional understanding of policy effects and sustainability, particularly in data-poor environments.

Suggested Citation

  • Hannes Jochen König & Johannes Schuler & Utia Suarma & Desmond McNeill & Jacques Imbernon & Frieta Damayanti & Syarifah Aini Dalimunthe & Sandra Uthes & Junun Sartohadi & Katharina Helming & Jake Morr, 2010. "Assessing the Impact of Land Use Policy on Urban-Rural Sustainability Using the FoPIA Approach in Yogyakarta, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(7), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:2:y:2010:i:7:p:1991-2009:d:8876
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/7/1991/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/2/7/1991/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hannes J. König & Frieder Graef & Jana Schindler & Anja Fasse & Khamaldin Daud Mutabazi & Christine Lambert & Pamela Ngwenya & Götz Uckert & Henry Mahoo & Fred F. Hattermann & Stefan Sieber, 2017. "Combining participatory, qualitative and quantitative methods for impact assessment of food value chains into an integrated framework," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(6), pages 1309-1321, December.
    2. Heitor Luís Costa Coutinho & Ana Paula Dias Turetta & Joyce Maria Guimarães Monteiro & Selma Simões de Castro & José Paulo Pietrafesa, 2017. "Participatory Sustainability Assessment for Sugarcane Expansion in Goiás, Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Seema Purushothaman & Sheetal Patil & Ierene Francis, 2012. "Impact of policies favouring organic inputs on small farms in Karnataka, India: a multicriteria approach," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 507-527, August.
    4. Jana Schindler & Frieder Graef & Hannes Jochen König & Devotha Mchau, 2017. "Developing community-based food security criteria in rural Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 9(6), pages 1285-1298, December.
    5. Schindler, Jana & Graef, Frieder & König, Hannes Jochen, 2016. "Participatory impact assessment: Bridging the gap between scientists' theory and farmers' practice," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 38-43.
    6. Hannes J. König & Aranka Podhora & Lin Zhen & Katharina Helming & Huimin Yan & Bingzhen Du & Jost Wübbeke & Chao Wang & Julie Klinger & Cheng Chen & Sandra Uthes, 2015. "Knowledge Brokerage for Impact Assessment of Land Use Scenarios in Inner Mongolia, China: Extending and Testing the FoPIA Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-23, April.
    7. Gaofeng Xu & Jian Liu & Min Zhang, 2024. "Land Property Rights, Spatial Form, and Land Performance: A Framework of Policy Performance Evaluation on Collective-Owned Construction Land and Evidence from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Henríquez-Dole, Lenin & Usón, Tomás J. & Vicuña, Sebastián & Henríquez, Cristián & Gironás, Jorge & Meza, Francisco, 2018. "Integrating strategic land use planning in the construction of future land use scenarios and its performance: The Maipo River Basin, Chile," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 353-366.
    9. Susan Olivia & Geua Boe‐Gibson & Glen Stitchbury & Lars Brabyn & John Gibson, 2018. "Urban land expansion in Indonesia 1992–2012: evidence from satellite‐detected luminosity," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 62(3), pages 438-456, July.
    10. Fei Shi & Yuanyuan Lu & Longgao Chen & Wei-Ling Hsu, 2023. "Evaluation of the Sustainable Use of Land Resources in the Cities along the Jiangsu Section of the Beijing–Hangzhou Grand Canal," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, June.
    11. L. E. A. Hernandez & F. Graef & H. J. König, 2019. "Participatory Impact Assessment of Food Securing Upgrading Strategies in Rural Tanzania," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 687-706, December.
    12. Jun Wang & Zhihua Wang & Hongbin Cheng & Junmei Kang & Xiaoliang Liu, 2022. "Land Cover Changing Pattern in Pre- and Post-Earthquake Affected Area from Remote Sensing Data: A Case of Lushan County, Sichuan Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, July.
    13. Sieber, Stefan & Amjath-Babu, T.S. & Reidsma, Pytrik & Koenig, Hannes & Piorr, Annette & Bezlepkina, Irina & Mueller, Klaus, 2018. "Sustainability impact assessment tools for land use policy advice: A comparative analysis of five research approaches," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 75-85.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:2:y:2010:i:7:p:1991-2009:d:8876. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.