IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2644-d1614102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bibliometric Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques in Disaster Management and Transportation in Emergencies: Towards Sustainable Solutions

Author

Listed:
  • Ezgi Aktas Potur

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Gazi University, 06570 Ankara, Türkiye)

  • Ahmet Aktas

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Turkish Aeronautical Association, 06790 Ankara, Türkiye
    School of Science and Technology, Cape Breton University, Sydney, NS B1M 1A2, Canada)

  • Mehmet Kabak

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Gazi University, 06570 Ankara, Türkiye)

Abstract

Disaster management minimizes potential harm and protects populations across four phases: preparedness, mitigation, response, and recovery. Diverse scientific approaches could be applied at each phase, among which Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) methods are widely recognized and utilized. Their integration provides a systematic framework for prioritizing disaster-related criteria, optimizing resource use, and minimizing environmental impact, ultimately enhancing community resilience. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis to identify pioneering researchers, leading institutions, contributing countries, and interaction levels working on MCDM methods in disaster management and emergency transportation, as well as to reveal key trends. 365 Web of Science and Scopus publications (2000–2024) were analyzed using the Bibliometrix tool in R. As a significant outcome, three important clusters emerged: Disaster Planning and Logistics, Risk and Resilience, and Crisis Response and Decision Support. The interplay between these clusters and the methodologies shaping them was highlighted, alongside insights from the most recent studies. This study could serve as a roadmap for future research, guiding efforts to address gaps such as real-time applications, multi-hazard integration, and scalability. It contributes to the limited body of research on MCDM in disaster management and emergency transportation, laying the groundwork for upcoming studies that could enhance resilience and promote sustainable development.

Suggested Citation

  • Ezgi Aktas Potur & Ahmet Aktas & Mehmet Kabak, 2025. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques in Disaster Management and Transportation in Emergencies: Towards Sustainable Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-24, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2644-:d:1614102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2644/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2644/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mehrnoosh Taherizadeh & Arman Niknam & Thong Nguyen-Huy & Gábor Mezősi & Reza Sarli, 2023. "Flash flood-risk areas zoning using integration of decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory, GIS-based analytic network process and satellite-derived information," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(3), pages 2309-2335, September.
    2. Solomon Tesfamariam & Rehan Sadiq & Homayoun Najjaran, 2010. "Decision Making Under Uncertainty—An Example for Seismic Risk Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 78-94, January.
    3. Philip-Mark Spanidis & Christos Roumpos & Francis Pavloudakis, 2021. "A Fuzzy-AHP Methodology for Planning the Risk Management of Natural Hazards in Surface Mining Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    4. Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2010. "Dynamic relief-demand management for emergency logistics operations under large-scale disasters," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Shahriar Akter & Samuel Fosso Wamba, 2019. "Big data and disaster management: a systematic review and agenda for future research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 939-959, December.
    6. Haoyuan Hong & Himan Shahabi & Ataollah Shirzadi & Wei Chen & Kamran Chapi & Baharin Bin Ahmad & Majid Shadman Roodposhti & Arastoo Yari Hesar & Yingying Tian & Dieu Tien Bui, 2019. "Landslide susceptibility assessment at the Wuning area, China: a comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 96(1), pages 173-212, March.
    7. Thomas P. Bostick & Thomas H. Holzer & Shahryar Sarkani, 2017. "Enabling Stakeholder Involvement in Coastal Disaster Resilience Planning," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(6), pages 1181-1200, June.
    8. Asmaa M. Hagag & Laila S. Yousef & Tamer F. Abdelmaguid, 2023. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making for Machine Selection in Manufacturing and Construction: Recent Trends," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Kazuya Nakayachi & Julia S. Becker & Sally H. Potter & Maximilian Dixon, 2019. "Residents’ Reactions to Earthquake Early Warnings in Japan," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(8), pages 1723-1740, August.
    10. Penjani Hopkins Nyimbili & Turan Erden & Himmet Karaman, 2018. "Integration of GIS, AHP and TOPSIS for earthquake hazard analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(3), pages 1523-1546, July.
    11. Miguel Ortíz-Barrios & Natalia Jaramillo-Rueda & Muhammet Gul & Melih Yucesan & Genett Jiménez-Delgado & Juan-José Alfaro-Saíz, 2023. "A Fuzzy Hybrid MCDM Approach for Assessing the Emergency Department Performance during the COVID-19 Outbreak," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-39, March.
    12. Gutjahr, Walter J. & Nolz, Pamela C., 2016. "Multicriteria optimization in humanitarian aid," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 252(2), pages 351-366.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li Zhu & Yeming Gong & Yishui Xu & Jun Gu, 2019. "Emergency Relief Routing Models for Injured Victims Considering Equity and Priority," Post-Print hal-02879681, HAL.
    2. Zhang, Guowei & Zhu, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng & Xia, Jun, 2021. "Humanitarian relief network assessment using collaborative truck-and-drone system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Zhongzhen Yang & Liquan Guo & Zaili Yang, 2019. "Emergency logistics for wildfire suppression based on forecasted disaster evolution," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 917-937, December.
    4. Li Zhu & Yeming Gong & Yishui Xu & Jun Gu, 2019. "Emergency relief routing models for injured victims considering equity and priority," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1573-1606, December.
    5. Rezaei-Malek, Mohammad & Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, Reza & Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel & Taheri-Moghaddam, Alireza, 2016. "An approximation approach to a trade-off among efficiency, efficacy, and balance for relief pre-positioning in disaster management," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 485-509.
    6. Yanjin He & Hosang Jung, 2018. "A Voting TOPSIS Approach for Determining the Priorities of Areas Damaged in Disasters," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-16, May.
    7. Rodolfo Modrigais Strauss Nunes & Susana Carla Farias Pereira, 2022. "Intellectual structure and trends in the humanitarian operations field," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1099-1157, December.
    8. Abinash Bhattachan & Matthew D. Jurjonas & Priscilla R. Morris & Paul J. Taillie & Lindsey S. Smart & Ryan E. Emanuel & Erin L. Seekamp, 2019. "Linking residential saltwater intrusion risk perceptions to physical exposure of climate change impacts in rural coastal communities of North Carolina," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 97(3), pages 1277-1295, July.
    9. Cailin Wang & Jidong Wu & Xin He & Mengqi Ye & Wenhui Liu & Rumei Tang, 2018. "Emerging Trends and New Developments in Disaster Research after the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. A. Anaya-Arenas & J. Renaud & A. Ruiz, 2014. "Relief distribution networks: a systematic review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 223(1), pages 53-79, December.
    11. Julia S. Becker & Sally H. Potter & Lauren J. Vinnell & Kazuya Nakayachi & Sara K. McBride & David M. Johnston, 2020. "Earthquake early warning in Aotearoa New Zealand: a survey of public perspectives to guide warning system development," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Diehlmann, Florian & Klein, Miriam & Wiens, Marcus & Lüttenberg, Markus & Schultmann, Frank, 2020. "On the value of accurate demand information in public-private emergency collaborations," Working Paper Series in Production and Energy 51, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute for Industrial Production (IIP).
    13. Viet-Ha Nhu & Ataollah Shirzadi & Himan Shahabi & Sushant K. Singh & Nadhir Al-Ansari & John J. Clague & Abolfazl Jaafari & Wei Chen & Shaghayegh Miraki & Jie Dou & Chinh Luu & Krzysztof Górski & Binh, 2020. "Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparison between Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine Algorithms," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-30, April.
    14. Lu, Chung-Cheng & Ying, Kuo-Ching & Chen, Hui-Ju, 2016. "Real-time relief distribution in the aftermath of disasters – A rolling horizon approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 1-20.
    15. Feng Guo & Liguo Jiao, 2023. "A new scheme for approximating the weakly efficient solution set of vector rational optimization problems," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 86(4), pages 905-930, August.
    16. De Clercq, Djavan & Mahdi, Adam, 2024. "Feasibility of machine learning-based rice yield prediction in India at the district level using climate reanalysis and remote sensing data," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    17. Carland, Corinne & Goentzel, Jarrod & Montibeller, Gilberto, 2018. "Modeling the values of private sector agents in multi-echelon humanitarian supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 532-543.
    18. Chen, Jingxu & Wang, Shuaian & Liu, Zhiyuan & Guo, Yanyong, 2018. "Network-based optimization modeling of manhole setting for pipeline transportation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 38-55.
    19. Fan, Yu & Shao, Jianfang & Wang, Xihui & Liang, Liang, 2024. "Contract design between relief organisations and private-sector vendors: A humanitarian logistics framework," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    20. Sha-lei Zhan & Nan Liu & Yong Ye, 2014. "Coordinating efficiency and equity in disaster relief logistics via information updates," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(8), pages 1607-1621, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2644-:d:1614102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.