IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i5p1987-d1599750.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Advances in Primary Air Pollutant Emissions of Industrial Boilers in China: Emission Characteristics, Emission Inventories, and Mitigation Potentials

Author

Listed:
  • Yali Tong

    (School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xudong Guo

    (School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Fenghui Guo

    (School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Tao Yue

    (School of Energy and Environmental Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

Industrial boilers are one of the important anthropogenic emission sources of primary air pollutants including particulate matter (PM), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), and nitric oxide (NO x ). China possesses the largest number of industrial boilers in the world, characterized by a wide spatial and industrial distribution, and a small scale of individual capacity. The study of air pollutant emissions of industrial boilers in China is an essential field for realizing the green and sustainable development of Chinese industrial sectors in terms of air pollution and CO 2 reduction. Therefore, this study comprehensively summarized the research progress of industrial boilers in terms of primary air pollutant emissions. Currently, significant progress has been made in the study of air pollutant emissions from industrial boilers in China, including the following aspects: (1) the characterization of air pollutant emissions based on field data, (2) the development of multi-scale air pollutant emission inventories, and (3) the scenario analysis of emission reduction potentials and control strategies. In addition, this study further clarified the evolution of air pollution control technologies, based on the analysis of the development of air pollutant emission standards for industrial boilers. Further, the shortcomings of the research on air pollutant emissions of industrial boilers were elucidated, and the perspectives were proposed in view of the development requirements of air pollution control in China. This is expected to provide important contributions to the development of pollution-carbon reduction policies and formulation of green sustainable development strategies related to industrial boilers.

Suggested Citation

  • Yali Tong & Xudong Guo & Fenghui Guo & Tao Yue, 2025. "Advances in Primary Air Pollutant Emissions of Industrial Boilers in China: Emission Characteristics, Emission Inventories, and Mitigation Potentials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-22, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1987-:d:1599750
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1987/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/5/1987/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grubler, Arnulf & Nakicenovic, Nebojsa & Victor, David G., 1999. "Dynamics of energy technologies and global change," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 27(5), pages 247-280, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rosendahl, Knut Einar, 2004. "Cost-effective environmental policy: implications of induced technological change," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 1099-1121, November.
    2. Mazzanti, Massimiliano & Montini, Anna & Zoboli, Roberto, 2006. "Municipal Waste Production, Economic Drivers, and 'New' Waste Policies: EKC Evidence from Italian Regional and Provincial Panel Data," Climate Change Modelling and Policy Working Papers 12053, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    3. Stavins, Robert & Jaffe, Adam & Newell, Richard, 2000. "Technological Change and the Environment," Working Paper Series rwp00-002, Harvard University, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    4. Christiansen, Atle Christer, 2002. "New renewable energy developments and the climate change issue: a case study of Norwegian politics," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 235-243, February.
    5. Rezaei, Mostafa & Akimov, Alexandr & Gray, Evan MacA., 2024. "Techno-economics of renewable hydrogen export: A case study for Australia-Japan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    6. Xu, Lei & Su, Jun, 2016. "From government to market and from producer to consumer: Transition of policy mix towards clean mobility in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 328-340.
    7. Mercure, Jean-François, 2018. "Fashion, fads and the popularity of choices: Micro-foundations for diffusion consumer theory," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 194-207.
    8. Jeuland, Marc & Fetter, T. Robert & Li, Yating & Pattanayak, Subhrendu K. & Usmani, Faraz & Bluffstone, Randall A. & Chávez, Carlos & Girardeau, Hannah & Hassen, Sied & Jagger, Pamela & Jaime, Mónica , 2021. "Is energy the golden thread? A systematic review of the impacts of modern and traditional energy use in low- and middle-income countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    9. Méjean, Aurélie & Hope, Chris, 2008. "Modelling the costs of non-conventional oil: A case study of Canadian bitumen," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(11), pages 4205-4216, November.
    10. Dendi Ramdani & Arjen Witteloostuijn & Johanna Vanderstraeten & Julie Hermans & Marcus Dejardin, 2019. "The perceived benefits of the European Union standardization. An exploration according to firm size and firm capabilities," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 379-396, April.
    11. Vogt-Schilb, Adrien & Hallegatte, Stephane & de Gouvello Christophe, 2014. "Long-term mitigation strategies and marginal abatement cost curves : a case study on Brazil," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6808, The World Bank.
    12. Criqui, P. & Mima, S. & Menanteau, P. & Kitous, A., 2015. "Mitigation strategies and energy technology learning: An assessment with the POLES model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 90(PA), pages 119-136.
    13. Csereklyei, Zsuzsanna & Anantharama, Nandini & Kallies, Anne, 2021. "Electricity market transitions in Australia: Evidence using model-based clustering," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    14. Misato Sato & Karsten Neuhoff & Verena Graichen & Katja Schumacher & Felix Matthes, 2013. "Sectors under scrutiny � Evaluation of indicators to assess the risk of carbon leakage in the UK and Germany," GRI Working Papers 113, Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment.
    15. Gregory F. Nemet, 2006. "How well does Learning-by-doing Explain Cost Reductions in a Carbon-free Energy Technology?," Working Papers 2006.143, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    16. Inga Boie & Mario Ragwitz & Anne Held, 2016. "A composite indicator for short-term diffusion forecasts of renewable energy technologies – the case of Germany," Energy & Environment, , vol. 27(1), pages 28-54, February.
    17. World Bank Group, 2018. "Strategic Use of Climate Finance to Maximize Climate Action," World Bank Publications - Reports 30475, The World Bank Group.
    18. Kverndokk, Snorre & Rosendahl, Knut Einar & Rutherford, Thomas F., 2004. "Climate policies and induced technological change: Impacts and timing of technology subsidies," Memorandum 05/2004, Oslo University, Department of Economics.
    19. Adrien Vogt-Schilb & St�phane Hallegatte & Christophe de Gouvello, 2015. "Marginal abatement cost curves and the quality of emission reductions: a case study on Brazil," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(6), pages 703-723, November.
    20. Fetter, T. Robert, 2022. "Energy transitions and technology change: “Leapfrogging” reconsidered," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:5:p:1987-:d:1599750. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.