IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1496-d1588974.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spillover Effects of Financial Development and Globalisation on Environmental Quality in EAEU Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Sergei Vladimirovich Shkiotov

    (Department of Economics and Management, Yaroslavl State Technical University, Yaroslavl 150023, Russia)

  • Maksim Igorevich Markin

    (Department of Economics and Management, Yaroslavl State Technical University, Yaroslavl 150023, Russia)

  • Galina Alekseevna Rodina

    (Department of Economics and Management, Yaroslavl State Technical University, Yaroslavl 150023, Russia)

  • Margarita Izrailevna Berkovich

    (Institute of Management, Economics and Finance, Kostroma State University, Kostroma 156005, Russia)

  • Yuri Viktorovich Korechkov

    (Department of Economics and Public Administration, International Academy of Business and New Technologies, Yaroslavl 150003, Russia)

Abstract

One of the unexpected consequences of interregional integration is the risk of environmental degradation. The lack of barriers for goods, services, and economic resources within the area of integration association results in monetary expansion and facilitates economic growth. Indeed, the further consequence is environmental degradation in accordance with the Kuznets environmental curve hypothesis. Therefore, the dynamics of trade turnover and the GDP of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) countries for 2023, the lack of the environmental empirical studies in the EAEU, and the impact of integration processes on environmental quality within the integration association are extremely relevant. The aim of this study is to identify the impact of integration spillover effects on the ecological footprint of five EAEU countries between 1992 and 2023. In order to achieve this research objective, an analysis sequence was carried out through the following steps: analyse the stationarity of the variables; check for cross-sectional dependence; evaluate the consistency of an estimator; calculate the Moran’s I index; estimate research results using the Spatial Error Model (SEM), Spatial Autoregressive Model (SAR), and Spatial Dubin Model (SDM), or eliminate the spatial models; analyse and diagnose the model; correct multicollinearity. By applying the Common Correlated Effects Mean Group (CCEMG) model (the model obtained showed a high coefficient of determination R-squared ~69%), the results are summarised: (1) Economic growth and integration processes have a positive and statistically significant impact on ecological footprints. (2) Financial development does not have a long-term statistically significant impact on environmental quality in the EAEU countries. These findings underscore the urgent need for a sustainability-oriented approach to economic integration within the EAEU. This study proposes a comprehensive roadmap for policymakers, emphasising the integration of green finance mechanisms, the adoption of sustainable trade practices, and the establishment of a regional environmental governance framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergei Vladimirovich Shkiotov & Maksim Igorevich Markin & Galina Alekseevna Rodina & Margarita Izrailevna Berkovich & Yuri Viktorovich Korechkov, 2025. "Spillover Effects of Financial Development and Globalisation on Environmental Quality in EAEU Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-25, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1496-:d:1588974
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1496/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1496/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Shanping & Martinez-Zarzoso, Inmaculada, 2014. "A panel data analysis of trade creation and trade diversion effects: The case of ASEAN–China Free Trade Area," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 138-151.
    2. M. Hashem Pesaran, 2006. "Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 74(4), pages 967-1012, July.
    3. Zhang Xiuwu & Huang Zhangmin & Jiang Sihan, 2022. "The impact of two-way FDI on total factor productivity in China and countries of the belt and road initiative," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 2868-2888, December.
    4. Zhao, Bingyu & Yang, Wanping, 2020. "Does financial development influence CO2 emissions? A Chinese province-level study," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Solarin, Sakiru Adebola & Mahmood, Haider & Arouri, Mohamed, 2013. "Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 145-152.
    6. Hausman, Jerry, 2015. "Specification tests in econometrics," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 38(2), pages 112-134.
    7. Yilmaz Bayar & Laura Diaconu (Maxim) & Andrei Maxim, 2020. "Financial Development and CO 2 Emissions in Post-Transition European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-15, March.
    8. He, Weijun & Wang, Bo & Danish, & Wang, Zhaohua, 2018. "Will regional economic integration influence carbon dioxide marginal abatement costs? Evidence from Chinese panel data," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 263-274.
    9. Li, Jianglong & Lin, Boqiang, 2017. "Does energy and CO2 emissions performance of China benefit from regional integration?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 366-378.
    10. Ullah, Sami & Lin, Boqiang, 2024. "Harnessing the synergistic impacts of financial structure, industrialization, and ecological footprint through the lens of the EKC hypothesis. Insights from Pakistan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 307(C).
    11. Xu, Xin & Huang, Shupei & An, Haizhong, 2021. "Identification and causal analysis of the influence channels of financial development on CO2 emissions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    12. Im, Kyung So & Pesaran, M. Hashem & Shin, Yongcheol, 2003. "Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 115(1), pages 53-74, July.
    13. T. Gries & R. Grundmann & I. Palnau & M. Redlin, 2018. "Technology diffusion, international integration and participation in developing economies - a review of major concepts and findings," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 215-253, January.
    14. Usman, Ojonugwa & Alola, Andrew Adewale & Sarkodie, Samuel Asumadu, 2020. "Assessment of the role of renewable energy consumption and trade policy on environmental degradation using innovation accounting: Evidence from the US," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 266-277.
    15. Onyebuchi Iwegbu & Kainu Justine & Leonardo Chaves Borges Cardoso, 2022. "Regional financial integration, financial development and industrial sector growth in ECOWAS: Does institution matter?," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 2050495-205, December.
    16. Levin, Andrew & Lin, Chien-Fu & James Chu, Chia-Shang, 2002. "Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 108(1), pages 1-24, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Boqiang & Okoye, Jude O., 2023. "Towards renewable energy generation and low greenhouse gas emission in high-income countries: Performance of financial development and governance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    2. Saboori, Behnaz & Gholipour, Hassan F. & Rasoulinezhad, Ehsan & Ranjbar, Omid, 2022. "Renewable energy sources and unemployment rate: Evidence from the US states," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    3. Arnold, Jens & Bassanini, Andrea & Scarpetta, Stefano, 2011. "Solow or Lucas? Testing speed of convergence on a panel of OECD countries," Research in Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 110-123, June.
    4. Uzar, Umut, 2020. "Political economy of renewable energy: Does institutional quality make a difference in renewable energy consumption?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 591-603.
    5. Al-Shboul, Mohammad & Maghyereh, Aktham & Hassan, Abul & Molyneux, Phillip, 2020. "Political risk and bank stability in the Middle East and North Africa region," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    6. Rim El Khoury & Nohade Nasrallah & Hazem Marashdeh & Osama F. Atayah & Kaliyan Mathiyazhagan, 2024. "The nexus of Green finance and renewable energy on CO2 emissions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8911-8928, December.
    7. R. Golinelli & I. Mammi & A. Musolesi, 2018. "Parameter heterogeneity, persistence and cross-sectional dependence: new insights on fiscal policy reaction functions for the Euro area," Working Papers wp1120, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    8. Güzin Bayar, 2018. "Estimating export equations: a survey of the literature," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 54(2), pages 629-672, March.
    9. Tarik Dogru & Umit Bulut & Ercan Sirakaya-Turk, 2021. "Modeling tourism demand: Theoretical and empirical considerations for future research," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(4), pages 874-889, June.
    10. Issam Khelfaoui & Yuantao Xie & Muhammad Hafeez & Danish Ahmed & Houssem Eddine Degha & Hicham Meskher, 2022. "Information Communication Technology and Infant Mortality in Low-Income Countries: Empirical Study Using Panel Data Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-24, June.
    11. Carvelli, Gianni, 2024. "The dynamic effects of public investments on private capital formation: Modelling a heterogeneous asymmetric cointegration with unobserved global factors," International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    12. Eibinger, Tobias & Deixelberger, Beate & Manner, Hans, 2024. "Panel data in environmental economics: Econometric issues and applications to IPAT models," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Cem Ertur & Antonio Musolesi, 2017. "Weak and Strong Cross‐Sectional Dependence: A Panel Data Analysis of International Technology Diffusion," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 477-503, April.
    14. Ciarlone, Alessio, 2011. "Housing wealth effect in emerging economies," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 399-417.
    15. Gangopadhyay, Partha & Jain, Siddharth & Bakry, Walid, 2022. "In search of a rational foundation for the massive IT boom in the Australian banking industry: Can the IT boom really drive relationship banking?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    16. Taguchi, Hiroyuki, 2024. "Air pollutions and its control governance in Chinese provinces in post-COVID-19 era: panel estimations of provincial environmental Kuznets curves," MPRA Paper 121488, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Cheng Hsiao, 2007. "Panel data analysis—advantages and challenges," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 16(1), pages 1-22, May.
    18. DELL'ANNO, Roberto & VILLA, Stefania, 2012. "Growth in Transition Countries: Big Bang versus Gradualism," CELPE Discussion Papers 122, CELPE - CEnter for Labor and Political Economics, University of Salerno, Italy.
    19. Kurt Hafner, 2008. "The pattern of international patenting and technology diffusion," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(21), pages 2819-2837.
    20. Wilman-Santiago Ochoa-Moreno & Byron Alejandro Quito & Carlos Andrés Moreno-Hurtado, 2021. "Foreign Direct Investment and Environmental Quality: Revisiting the EKC in Latin American Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1496-:d:1588974. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.