IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1154-d1581069.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Open Environmental Collaborations as an Innovation Tool for Sustainable Development: Evidence from Russian Pulp and Paper Industry

Author

Listed:
  • Nadezhda Shmeleva

    (Department of Digital Management and Innovation, National University of Science & Technology (MISIS), Moscow 119049, Russia)

  • Tatyana Tolstykh

    (Department of Industrial Management, National University of Science & Technology (MISIS), Moscow 119049, Russia)

  • Tatiana Guseva

    (Research Institute “Environmental Industrial Policy Centre”, Moscow 115054, Russia)

  • Arina Volosatova

    (Research Institute “Environmental Industrial Policy Centre”, Moscow 115054, Russia)

Abstract

The relevance of this research lies in the increasing global focus on sustainable development, the growth of the green economy, and the pursuit of national and international goals in these areas. This study examines the role of environmental collaboration models and green business integration in implementing environmental and technological projects to achieve sustainable development goals aimed at the enhancement of resource efficiency and environmental performance within companies. Open environmental collaboration business models generate additional value and competitive advantages by leveraging the synergistic integration of resources and knowledge among all participants. The study’s methodological foundation includes systems analysis and comparative analysis. The findings identify the key characteristics of open environmental collaboration business models and propose recommendations for establishing a system to assess green integration projects. The proposed approach was validated through application at one of the largest pulp and paper manufacturers. As a result of the implementation of the environmental collaboration business model, the profit of Syktyvkar Forest Industry Complex increased four times, revenue almost doubled, product output increased by 89%, and asset value increased by 62%. The study contributes to a deeper understanding of how industrial integration impacts regional green development. It also provides empirical insights and policy recommendations for businesses and governments to promote environmental collaboration and advance green development through knowledge and technology transfer.

Suggested Citation

  • Nadezhda Shmeleva & Tatyana Tolstykh & Tatiana Guseva & Arina Volosatova, 2025. "Open Environmental Collaborations as an Innovation Tool for Sustainable Development: Evidence from Russian Pulp and Paper Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1154-:d:1581069
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1154/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1154/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sven Kevin van Langen & Renato Passaro, 2021. "The Dutch Green Deals Policy and Its Applicability to Circular Economy Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    2. Franziska Mais & Thomas Bauernhansl, 2024. "Design Options for Sustainable and Open Business Models: A Taxonomy-Based Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Chenggang Wang & Danli Du & Tiansen Liu & Xiaohuan Li & Yue Zhu & Wenhui Du & Fan Xu & Mingtong Yan & Junxin Chen, 2024. "Environmental Regulations, Green Technological Innovation, and Green Economy: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-23, June.
    4. Seppo Yrjölä & Petri Ahokangas & Marja Matinmikko-Blue, 2020. "Sustainability as a Challenge and Driver for Novel Ecosystemic 6G Business Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-30, October.
    5. Marian R. Chertow, 2007. "“Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 11(1), pages 11-30, January.
    6. Flávio José Simioni & Juliana Ferreira Soares & Jeane de Almeida do Rosário & Luiza Garcia Sell & Eduardo Bertol & Fabio Murilo Padilha Souza & Edvaldo Pereira Santos Júnior & Luiz Moreira Coelho Juni, 2024. "Industrial Symbiosis and Circular Economy Practices Towards Sustainability in Forest-Based Clusters: Case Studies in Southern Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Oana Bărbulescu & Cristina Nicolau & Daniel Munteanu, 2021. "Within the Entrepreneurship Ecosystem: Is Innovation Clusters’ Strategic Approach Boosting Businesses’ Sustainable Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Tatyana Tolstykh & Nadezhda Shmeleva & Leyla Gamidullaeva & Victoria Krasnobaeva, 2023. "The Role of Collaboration in the Development of Industrial Enterprises Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-26, April.
    9. Elena Maslyukova & Vyacheslav Volchik & Wadim Strielkowski, 2024. "Reindustrialization, Innovative Sustainable Economic Development, and Societal Values: A Cluster Analysis Approach," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Hannes Kolasch & Franziska Mais, 2024. "Tools and Frameworks for Sustainable Business Model Innovation for German Steel, Cement, and Chemical Industries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-15, June.
    11. Xiaoyu Ju & Xiaoli Zhou & Liangwei Zhang & Chun-Ai Ma & Yue Zhang, 2024. "Evaluation of Low-Carbon Economic Efficiency under Industrial Clustering and Study of Regional Differences, Taking Xinjiang as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-19, February.
    12. Patrizia Gazzola & Carlo Drago & Enrica Pavione & Noemi Pignoni, 2024. "Sustainable Business Models: An Empirical Analysis of Environmental Sustainability in Leading Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Lindert,Peter H., 2021. "Making Social Spending Work," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781108478168, January.
    14. Nadezhda Shmeleva & Tatyana Tolstykh & Viktoria Krasnobaeva & Diana Boboshko & Denis Lazarenko, 2024. "Network Integration as a Tool for Sustainable Business Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-25, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Lu & Fujii, Minoru & Li, Zhaoling & Dong, Huijuan & Geng, Yong & Liu, Zhe & Fujita, Tsuyoshi & Yu, Xiaoman & Zhang, Yuepeng, 2020. "Energy-saving and carbon emission reduction effect of urban-industrial symbiosis implementation with feasibility analysis in the city," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    2. Diogo Ferraz & Fernanda P. S. Falguera & Enzo B. Mariano & Dominik Hartmann, 2021. "Linking Economic Complexity, Diversification, and Industrial Policy with Sustainable Development: A Structured Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Xin Nie & Jianxian Wu & Han Wang & Weijuan Li & Chengdao Huang & Lihua Li, 2022. "Contributing to carbon peak: Estimating the causal impact of eco‐industrial parks on low‐carbon development in China," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1578-1593, August.
    4. Eleonora Annunziata & Francesco Rizzi & Tiberio Daddi & Marco Frey, 2019. "Business models for interfirm energy cooperation in industrial parks: A possible taxonomy," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 133-148.
    5. Tran Thu Trang & Simon R. Bush & Judith van Leeuwen, 2023. "Enhancing institutional capacity in a centralized state: The case of industrial water use efficiency in Vietnam," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 210-222, February.
    6. Sun, Lu & Li, Hong & Dong, Liang & Fang, Kai & Ren, Jingzheng & Geng, Yong & Fujii, Minoru & Zhang, Wei & Zhang, Ning & Liu, Zhe, 2017. "Eco-benefits assessment on urban industrial symbiosis based on material flows analysis and emergy evaluation approach: A case of Liuzhou city, China," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 78-88.
    7. João Azevedo & Juan Henriques & Marco Estrela & Rui Dias & Doroteya Vladimirova & Karen Miller & Muriel Iten, 2021. "Guidelines for Industrial Symbiosis—a Systematic Approach for Content Definition and Practical Recommendations for Implementation," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 507-523, September.
    8. Doryn Negesa & Wei Cong & Lei Cheng & Lei Shi, 2022. "Development of eco‐industrial parks in Ethiopia: The case of Hawassa Industrial Park," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(3), pages 1078-1093, June.
    9. Yong Xiang & Yunhui Ma & Meiling Ji & Yangyang Su, 2024. "Interconnected Knowledge: Examining the Evolution of Graduate Student Innovation Ecosystems," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14036-14075, September.
    10. Anna Gatzioura & Miquel Sànchez-Marrè & Karina Gibert, 2019. "A Hybrid Recommender System to Improve Circular Economy in Industrial Symbiotic Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Chembessi Chedrak & Gohoungodji Paulin & Juste Rajaonson, 2023. "“A fine wine, better with age”: Circular economy historical roots and influential publications: A bibliometric analysis using Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy (RPYS)," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(6), pages 1593-1612, December.
    12. Fortuna, Lorena M. & Diyamandoglu, Vasil, 2015. "NYC WasteMatch – An online facilitated materials exchange as a tool for pollution prevention," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 122-131.
    13. Yuan Yuan & Xintong Sun & Ning Liu, 2022. "Measuring structural characteristics and evolutionary patterns of an industrial carbon footprint network: A social network analysis approach," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 14(S2), pages 159-180, November.
    14. João Pinto & Rui Boavida-Dias & Henrique A. Matos & João Azevedo, 2022. "Analysis of the Food Loss and Waste Valorisation of Animal By-Products from the Retail Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-27, February.
    15. Wisdom Kanda & Martin Geissdoerfer & Olof Hjelm, 2021. "From circular business models to circular business ecosystems," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 2814-2829, September.
    16. Alfred Posch & Abhishek Agarwal & Peter Strachan, 2011. "Editorial: Managing Industrial Symbiosis (IS) Networks," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(7), pages 421-427, November.
    17. Taskhiri, Mohammad Sadegh & Tan, Raymond R. & Chiu, Anthony S.F., 2011. "Emergy-based fuzzy optimization approach for water reuse in an eco-industrial park," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(7), pages 730-737.
    18. J. Rincón-Moreno & M. Ormazábal & C. Jaca, 2022. "Stakeholder Perspectives in Transitioning to a Local Circular Economy: a Case Study in Spain," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 693-711, June.
    19. Nadezhda Shmeleva & Tatyana Tolstykh & Viktoria Krasnobaeva & Diana Boboshko & Denis Lazarenko, 2024. "Network Integration as a Tool for Sustainable Business Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-25, October.
    20. Nadezhda Shmeleva & Tatyana Tolstykh & Olga Dudareva, 2023. "Integration as a Driver of Enterprise Sustainability: The Russian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1154-:d:1581069. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.