IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v12y2020i21p8951-d436001.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainability as a Challenge and Driver for Novel Ecosystemic 6G Business Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Seppo Yrjölä

    (Centre for Wireless Communications, University of Oulu, 90570 Oulu, Finland
    Nokia Enterprise, 90620 Oulu, Finland)

  • Petri Ahokangas

    (Oulu Business School, University of Oulu, 90570 Oulu, Finland)

  • Marja Matinmikko-Blue

    (Centre for Wireless Communications, University of Oulu, 90570 Oulu, Finland)

Abstract

Climate change, the deterioration of the environment and exceeding Earth’s carrying capacity are major threats in operating environment which require new actions in industrialized and digitalized society. In parallel with the global deployment of 5th generation (5G) mobile communication networks, the telecommunication community has already started to envision 6G networks that target the year 2030. This paper discusses the unprecedented opportunities in the future 6G ecosystem specifically from the business perspective and applies a futures-oriented scenario planning method utilized in two strategy workshops in 2020. The paper portrays four scenario themes and a total of 16 alternative future scenarios for the business of 6G. Through the identification of key trends, their interactions, and related uncertainties, the scenario development process generates alternative futures where 6G business strategies are then developed and assessed through the business model perspective. Scenarios were created under four themes: user experience, business, sustainability, and geopolitics and they are discussed in terms of economical, societal, and environmental perspectives. The findings of the paper highlight the achievement of a preferred sustainable future that calls for attention to the privacy and security aspects considering business and regulatory needs: public/governmental, corporate, community, and human perspectives and aims of governance; ecosystem configuration related to users, decentralized business models, and platforms; user empowerment; and the role of service location-specificity. The findings indicate that it is vital to bring together relevant stakeholders to solve sustainability problems within the ecosystem and pay special attention to open ecosystem-focused value configuration and decentralized poly-nodal power configuration, while responding to the diversified demands of various users across the different verticals.

Suggested Citation

  • Seppo Yrjölä & Petri Ahokangas & Marja Matinmikko-Blue, 2020. "Sustainability as a Challenge and Driver for Novel Ecosystemic 6G Business Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-30, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:8951-:d:436001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/8951/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/12/21/8951/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gawer, Annabelle, 2014. "Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1239-1249.
    2. Morris, Michael & Schindehutte, Minet & Allen, Jeffrey, 2005. "The entrepreneur's business model: toward a unified perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 726-735, June.
    3. Carlos Oliveira Cruz & Joaquim Miranda Sarmento, 2020. "“Mobility as a Service” Platforms: A Critical Path towards Increasing the Sustainability of Transportation Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.
    4. Tom Kuhlman & John Farrington, 2010. "What is Sustainability?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(11), pages 1-13, November.
    5. Steve Evans & Doroteya Vladimirova & Maria Holgado & Kirsten Van Fossen & Miying Yang & Elisabete A. Silva & Claire Y. Barlow, 2017. "Business Model Innovation for Sustainability: Towards a Unified Perspective for Creation of Sustainable Business Models," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(5), pages 597-608, July.
    6. Teece, David J., 2018. "Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(8), pages 1367-1387.
    7. Julius Francis Gomes & Marika Iivari & Minna Pikkarainen & Petri Ahokangas, 2018. "Business Models as Enablers of Ecosystemic Interaction: A Dynamic Capability Perspective," International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), IGI Global, vol. 9(3), pages 1-13, July.
    8. Kantola, Raimo, 2019. "Net Neutrality Under EU Law – a Hindrance to 5G Success," 30th European Regional ITS Conference, Helsinki 2019 205187, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    9. Raphael Amit & Christoph Zott, 2001. "Value creation in E‐business," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(6‐7), pages 493-520, June.
    10. Alberto Onetti & Antonella Zucchella & Marian Jones & Patricia McDougall-Covin, 2012. "Internationalization, innovation and entrepreneurship: business models for new technology-based firms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(3), pages 337-368, August.
    11. Stephen L. Vargo & Robert F. Lusch, 2016. "Institutions and axioms: an extension and update of service-dominant logic," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 5-23, January.
    12. Georg Stampfl & Reinhard Prügl & Vincent Osterloh, 2013. "An explorative model of business model scalability," International Journal of Product Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(3/4), pages 226-248.
    13. Pieter BALLON, 2009. "The Platformisation of the European Mobile Industry," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(75), pages 15-34, 3rd quart.
    14. Elias G. Carayannis & David F. J. Campbell, 2019. "Smart Quintuple Helix Innovation Systems," SpringerBriefs in Business, Springer, number 978-3-030-01517-6, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xueyan Wang & Hong Wu & Lu Lu, 2021. "A Novel Service Provision Mode for Sustainable Development of the Telecom Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Ojutkangas, Kirsi & Rossi, Elina & Matinmikko-Blue, Marja, 2022. "A deep dive into the birth process of linking 6G and the UN SDGs," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(1).
    3. Rohit Kumar & Saurav Kumar Gupta & Hwang-Cheng Wang & C. Shyamala Kumari & Sai Srinivas Vara Prasad Korlam, 2023. "From Efficiency to Sustainability: Exploring the Potential of 6G for a Greener Future," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-45, November.
    4. Shin, Hyunjin & Park, Sanghyun & Kim, Leehee & Kim, Jinseob & Kim, Taeeun & Song, Youngkeun & Lee, Sungjoo, 2024. "The future service scenarios of 6G telecommunications technology," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(2).
    5. Dharmendra Chauhan & Hiren Mewada & Vishva Gondalia & Faris A. Almalki & Sagarkumar Patel & Hardik Modi & Sagar Kavaiya & Yogesh Trivedi & Hana Mohammed Mujlid, 2024. "Balancing Technological Innovation and Environmental Sustainability: A Lifecycle Analysis of 6G Wireless Communication Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-27, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sebastian Schroedel, 2023. "The Sustainable Business Model Database: 92 Patterns That Enable Sustainability in Business Model Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-27, May.
    2. Liu, Yihui & Wu, Aiqi & Song, Di, 2022. "Exploring the Impact of Cross-side Network Interaction on Digital Platforms on Internationalization of Manufacturing Firms," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4).
    3. Ghezzi, Antonio & Cavallo, Angelo, 2020. "Agile Business Model Innovation in Digital Entrepreneurship: Lean Startup Approaches," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 519-537.
    4. Petri Ahokangas & Marja Matinmikko-Blue, 2021. "Introduction to Special Issue “Mobile Communications and Novel Business Models”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-5, January.
    5. Marko Peric & Jelena Durkin & Vanja Vitezic, 2017. "The Constructs of a Business Model Redefined: A Half-Century Journey," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, September.
    6. Arturo Orea Rocha & Carmelo García Pérez & Fernando Crecente Romero & Maria Teresa del Val Núñez, 2018. "The Business Model and its Core Elements. Proposal of Definition and Table of Core Elements," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 12(4), December.
    7. Jiang, Hong & Yang, Jingxuan & Gai, Jinlong, 2023. "How digital platform capability affects the innovation performance of SMEs—Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    8. Jiatao Li & Liang Chen & Jingtao Yi & Jiye Mao & Jianwen Liao, 2019. "Ecosystem-specific advantages in international digital commerce," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 50(9), pages 1448-1463, December.
    9. Heiko Wieland & Nathaniel N. Hartmann & Stephen L. Vargo, 2017. "Business models as service strategy," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(6), pages 925-943, November.
    10. Budler, Marko & Župič, Ivan & Trkman, Peter, 2021. "The development of business model research: A bibliometric review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 480-495.
    11. Mingfeng Tang & Grace Sheila Walsh & Cuiwen Li & Angathevar Baskaran, 2021. "Exploring technology business incubators and their business incubation models: case studies from China," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 90-116, February.
    12. Mara Del Baldo & Maria-Gabriella Baldarelli, 2017. "Renewing and improving the business model toward sustainability in theory and practice," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Best, Bernadette & Miller, Kristel & McAdam, Rodney & Maalaoui, Adnane, 2022. "Business model innovation within SPOs: Exploring the antecedents and mechanisms facilitating multi-level value co-creation within a value-network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 475-494.
    14. Christian Bartelheimer, Philipp zur Heiden, Hedda Lüttenberg, Daniel Beverungen, 2021. "Systematizing the Lexicon of Platforms in Information Systems: A Data-Driven Study," Working Papers Dissertations 79, Paderborn University, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics.
    15. Cinzia Battistella & Gianluca Murgia & Fabio Nonino, 2021. "Free-driven web-based business models," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 445-486, June.
    16. Coskun-Setirek, Abide & Tanrikulu, Zuhal, 2021. "Digital innovations-driven business model regeneration: A process model," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    17. Eleonora Annunziata & Francesco Rizzi & Tiberio Daddi & Marco Frey, 2019. "Business models for interfirm energy cooperation in industrial parks: A possible taxonomy," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 0(2), pages 133-148.
    18. Francesco Polese & Luca Carrubbo & Francesco Caputo & Debora Sarno, 2018. "Managing Healthcare Service Ecosystems: Abstracting a Sustainability-Based View from Hospitalization at Home (HaH) Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Feng-Shang Wu & Chia-Chang Tsai, 2022. "A Framework of the Value Co-Creation Cycle in Platform Businesses: An Exploratory Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Wenyao Zhang & Tugrul Daim & Qingpu Zhang, 2019. "Exploring the Multi-Phase Driven Process for Disruptive Business Model Innovation of E-Business Microcredit: a Multiple Case Study from China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(2), pages 590-617, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:12:y:2020:i:21:p:8951-:d:436001. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.