IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i1p369-d1561260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Emission Evaluation System for Foundation Construction Based on Entropy–TOPSIS and K-Means Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Yuan Chen

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Genglong He

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Yuan Fang

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Dongxu Li

    (Guangzhou Airport Construction & Investment Group Co., Ltd., Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Xi Wang

    (School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China)

Abstract

Green construction evaluation systems can assist building stakeholders in scientifically evaluating the carbon emission performance of construction projects. However, most green construction evaluation tools and methods fail to explicitly incorporate construction carbon emission indicators, let alone a quantitative evaluation. Therefore, this study proposes a carbon emission evaluation system based on the entropy–TOPSIS and K-means methods for foundation construction projects. In this study, we innovatively divided the carbon emission of the foundation construction process into three phases, namely, transportation emission, excavation and earthwork emission, and pile work emission, considering their different emission characteristics and reduction difficulties by nature. Different from traditional carbon evaluation methods, the carbon emission of the three phases were evaluated separately against the baseline value obtained from local construction quota. After that, the emission performance of the three phases was weighted and evaluated based on the entropy–TOPSIS method, and then rated via the K-means method. Based on a case study of 19 residential buildings, the weights of the three construction phases were 27.66% (transportation), 42.34% (excavation and earthwork), and 29.99% (pile work). The carbon performance of the 19 cases were rated by the K-means method into four levels: six cases were rated “Excellent”, five were rated “Good”, five were rated “Fair”, and three were rated “Poor”. The proposed method was expected to objectively and scientifically evaluate and rate the carbon emission of the foundation construction process, and provided a theoretical basis for decision makers to identify emission hotspots and formulate specific carbon reduction measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuan Chen & Genglong He & Yuan Fang & Dongxu Li & Xi Wang, 2025. "Carbon Emission Evaluation System for Foundation Construction Based on Entropy–TOPSIS and K-Means Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-34, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:369-:d:1561260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/369/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/369/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Papadopoulos, Sokratis & Kontokosta, Constantine E., 2019. "Grading buildings on energy performance using city benchmarking data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 244-253.
    2. Yu Cao & Cong Xu & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz, 2022. "A Systematic Review of Green Building Development in China: Advantages, Challenges and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-29, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Langevin, J. & Reyna, J.L. & Ebrahimigharehbaghi, S. & Sandberg, N. & Fennell, P. & Nägeli, C. & Laverge, J. & Delghust, M. & Mata, É. & Van Hove, M. & Webster, J. & Federico, F. & Jakob, M. & Camaras, 2020. "Developing a common approach for classifying building stock energy models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    2. Gómez, Patricia & Shaikh, Nazrul I. & Erkoc, Murat, 2024. "Continuous improvement in the efficient use of energy in office buildings through peers effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    3. Yue Yang & Kai Hu & Yibiao Liu & Zhihuang Wang & Kaihong Dong & Peijuan Lv & Xing Shi, 2023. "Optimisation of Building Green Performances Using Vertical Greening Systems: A Case Study in Changzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-30, March.
    4. Lee, Ruda & Kim, Dongsu & Yoon, Jongho & Kang, Eunho & Cho, Heejin & Kim, Jinhwi, 2024. "Development and calibration of apartment building energy model based on architectural and energy consumption characteristics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    5. Wang, Ran & Lu, Shilei & Feng, Wei, 2020. "A novel improved model for building energy consumption prediction based on model integration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    6. Yu, Xinran & Ergan, Semiha & Dedemen, Gokmen, 2019. "A data-driven approach to extract operational signatures of HVAC systems and analyze impact on electricity consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Yu Cao & Liyan Huang & Nur Mardhiyah Aziz & Syahrul Nizam Kamaruzzaman, 2022. "Building Information Modelling (BIM) Capabilities in the Design and Planning of Rural Settlements in China: A Systematic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-34, October.
    8. Lavinia Denisia Cuc & Dana Rad & Daniel Manațe & Silviu Gabriel Szentesi & Anca Dicu & Mioara Florina Pantea & Vanina Adoriana Trifan & Cosmin Silviu Raul Joldeș & Graziella Corina Bâtcă-Dumitru, 2023. "Representations of the Smart Green Concept and the Intention to Implement IoT in Romanian Real Estate Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    9. Roth, Jonathan & Lim, Benjamin & Jain, Rishee K. & Grueneich, Dian, 2020. "Examining the feasibility of using open data to benchmark building energy usage in cities: A data science and policy perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. Chunyan Wang & Hanying Jiang & Hao Wu & Yi Liu & Siyue Guo & Ming Xu, 2023. "Scaling in urban building energy use and its influencing factors," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(4), pages 1076-1088, August.
    11. Jiang, Feifeng & Ma, Jun & Li, Zheng & Ding, Yuexiong, 2022. "Prediction of energy use intensity of urban buildings using the semi-supervised deep learning model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    12. Luca Gugliermetti & Fabrizio Cumo & Sofia Agostinelli, 2024. "A Future Direction of Machine Learning for Building Energy Management: Interpretable Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-27, February.
    13. Abdulaziz Alghamdi & Guangji Hu & Husnain Haider & Kasun Hewage & Rehan Sadiq, 2020. "Benchmarking of Water, Energy, and Carbon Flows in Academic Buildings: A Fuzzy Clustering Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-25, May.
    14. Salah Vaisi & Saleh Mohammadi & Benedetto Nastasi & Kavan Javanroodi, 2020. "A New Generation of Thermal Energy Benchmarks for University Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Lee, Kyungjae & Lim, Hyunwoo & Hwang, Jeongyun & Lee, Doyeon, 2024. "Evaluating missing data handling methods for developing building energy benchmarking models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    16. Geraldi, Matheus Soares & Ghisi, Enedir, 2022. "Integrating evidence-based thermal satisfaction in energy benchmarking: A data-driven approach for a whole-building evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PB).
    17. Tahmineh Ladi & Shaghayegh Jabalameli & Ayyoob Sharifi, 2022. "Applications of machine learning and deep learning methods for climate change mitigation and adaptation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(4), pages 1314-1330, May.
    18. Piscitelli, Marco Savino & Giudice, Rocco & Capozzoli, Alfonso, 2024. "A holistic time series-based energy benchmarking framework for applications in large stocks of buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    19. Li, Tian & Bie, Haipei & Lu, Yi & Sawyer, Azadeh Omidfar & Loftness, Vivian, 2024. "MEBA: AI-powered precise building monthly energy benchmarking approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    20. Guo, Yanhua & Wang, Ningbo & Shao, Shuangquan & Huang, Congqi & Zhang, Zhentao & Li, Xiaoqiong & Wang, Youdong, 2024. "A review on hybrid physics and data-driven modeling methods applied in air source heat pump systems for energy efficiency improvement," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:369-:d:1561260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.