IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2024i1p196-d1556916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Charging of Electric Transportation Based on Power Modes Model—A Practical Case of an Integrated Factory Grid with RES

Author

Listed:
  • Dariusz Bober

    (Department of Computer Science, College of Natural Sciences, University of Rzeszów, 35-959 Rzeszów, Poland)

  • Piotr Miller

    (Department of Electrical Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

  • Paweł Pijarski

    (Department of Electrical Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

  • Bartłomiej Mroczek

    (Department of Electrical Power Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

Abstract

The possibility of charging and possibly discharging electric cars can influence not only the balancing of power demand profiles in the grid and the stabilization of voltage profiles but also the appropriate management of electricity within the grid of an industrial plant equipped with its own RES resources. For this purpose, the concept of “power supply modes” can be introduced, which involves intelligent demand-side management. Each technological process in an industrial plant should be assigned a specific level of importance and priority. These priorities can be numbered according to their importance (weights) and marked with appropriate colors. One thus obtains a qualitative assessment of energy consumption within the plant (demand side) through the lens of power modes. With respect to the ability to charge electric vehicles within the plant grid, such priorities can also be assigned to individual charging options. If a given RES has sufficient generation capacity during a particular time period, the cost of charging is low. However, if the RESs are not operational during a given period (e.g., nighttime in the case of photovoltaics or during calm weather in the case of wind turbines), vehicles can still be charged but according to a different priority, which, of course, involves higher costs. By having access to data on the generation capacity of distributed RESs and knowing the preferences of employees, including the number of electric cars and the expected periods of vehicle charging, it is possible to predict the degree of use of available green energy and manage it efficiently. The analyses presented in the article represent an original approach to the flexibility of operation not only of the electricity grid but also of the internal energy system of industrial plants. It offers a novel perspective aimed at maximizing the share of RESs in the overall energy balance and minimizing the costs associated with the operation of RESs. The theoretical opportunity of sustainable sharing with employees a dedicated charging mode named “free charging”, powered by RESs, could represent an appropriate solution for CO 2 emission reduction within Scope 3, Category 3, “employee commuting”, according to the GHG Protocol requirements. The original methodology proposed in the article aligns with activities related to the energy transition.

Suggested Citation

  • Dariusz Bober & Piotr Miller & Paweł Pijarski & Bartłomiej Mroczek, 2024. "Sustainable Charging of Electric Transportation Based on Power Modes Model—A Practical Case of an Integrated Factory Grid with RES," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-28, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:196-:d:1556916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/196/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/196/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaobao Yu & Zhenyu Dong & Dandan Zheng, 2023. "Research on Critical Peak Price Decision Optimization Considering Industrial Consumer’s Risk Appetite under the Carbon Neutrality Goal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Suresh Panchanathan & Pradeep Vishnuram & Narayanamoorthi Rajamanickam & Mohit Bajaj & Vojtech Blazek & Lukas Prokop & Stanislav Misak, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of the Bidirectional Converter Topologies for the Vehicle-to-Grid System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-33, March.
    3. Fernandes, Camila & Frías, Pablo & Latorre, Jesús M., 2012. "Impact of vehicle-to-grid on power system operation costs: The Spanish case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 194-202.
    4. Thomas L. Saaty & Luis G. Vargas, 2013. "Decision Making with the Analytic Network Process," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 2, number 978-1-4614-7279-7.
    5. Zeinab Teimoori & Abdulsalam Yassine, 2022. "A Review on Intelligent Energy Management Systems for Future Electric Vehicle Transportation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.
    6. Aixin Yang & Guiqing Zhang & Chenlu Tian & Wei Peng & Yechun Liu, 2024. "Charging Behavior Portrait of Electric Vehicle Users Based on Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Algorithm," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-26, March.
    7. Wang, Weijun & Han, Yicen & Wang, Meng & He, Yan, 2023. "Research on fair residential critical peak price: Based on a price penalty mechanism for high-electricity consumers," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    8. Björn Nykvist & Måns Nilsson, 2015. "Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 5(4), pages 329-332, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iacobucci, Riccardo & McLellan, Benjamin & Tezuka, Tetsuo, 2018. "Modeling shared autonomous electric vehicles: Potential for transport and power grid integration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 148-163.
    2. Ettore Bompard & Daniele Grosso & Tao Huang & Francesco Profumo & Xianzhang Lei & Duo Li, 2018. "World Decarbonization through Global Electricity Interconnections," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-29, July.
    3. Huang, Qisheng & Xu, Yunjian & Courcoubetis, Costas, 2020. "Stackelberg competition between merchant and regulated storage investment in wholesale electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    4. Gnann, Till & Stephens, Thomas S. & Lin, Zhenhong & Plötz, Patrick & Liu, Changzheng & Brokate, Jens, 2018. "What drives the market for plug-in electric vehicles? - A review of international PEV market diffusion models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 158-164.
    5. Rachele Corticelli & Margherita Pazzini & Cecilia Mazzoli & Claudio Lantieri & Annarita Ferrante & Valeria Vignali, 2022. "Urban Regeneration and Soft Mobility: The Case Study of the Rimini Canal Port in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-27, November.
    6. Carsten Helm & Mathias Mier, 2020. "Steering the Energy Transition in a World of Intermittent Electricity Supply: Optimal Subsidies and Taxes for Renewables Storage," ifo Working Paper Series 330, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    7. Yashraj Tripathy & Andrew McGordon & Anup Barai, 2020. "Improving Accessible Capacity Tracking at Low Ambient Temperatures for Range Estimation of Battery Electric Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Maria Taljegard & Lisa Göransson & Mikael Odenberger & Filip Johnsson, 2021. "To Represent Electric Vehicles in Electricity Systems Modelling—Aggregated Vehicle Representation vs. Individual Driving Profiles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, January.
    9. De Vivero-Serrano, Gustavo & Bruninx, Kenneth & Delarue, Erik, 2019. "Implications of bid structures on the offering strategies of merchant energy storage systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Ito, Nobuyuki & Takeuchi, Kenji & Managi, Shunsuke, 2019. "Do battery-switching systems accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles? A stated preference study," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 85-92.
    11. David Staš & Radim Lenort & Pavel Wicher & David Holman, 2015. "Green Transport Balanced Scorecard Model with Analytic Network Process Support," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-19, November.
    12. Ziad Ragab & Ehsan Pashajavid & Sumedha Rajakaruna, 2024. "Optimal Sizing and Economic Analysis of Community Battery Systems Considering Sensitivity and Uncertainty Factors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Tharsis Teoh & Oliver Kunze & Chee-Chong Teo & Yiik Diew Wong, 2018. "Decarbonisation of Urban Freight Transport Using Electric Vehicles and Opportunity Charging," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    14. Sun, Li & Sun, Wen & You, Fengqi, 2020. "Core temperature modelling and monitoring of lithium-ion battery in the presence of sensor bias," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).
    15. Biswas, D.B. & Bose, S. & Dalvi, V.H. & Deshmukh, S.P. & Shenoy, N.V. & Panse, S.V. & Joshi, J.B., 2020. "A techno-economic comparison between piston steam engines as dispatchable power generation systems for renewable energy with concentrated solar harvesting and thermal storage against solar photovoltai," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    16. Ivan Mareev & Dirk Uwe Sauer, 2018. "Energy Consumption and Life Cycle Costs of Overhead Catenary Heavy-Duty Trucks for Long-Haul Transportation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-18, December.
    17. Toktarova, Alla & Walter, Viktor & Göransson, Lisa & Johnsson, Filip, 2022. "Interaction between electrified steel production and the north European electricity system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    18. Cagli, Efe Caglar, 2023. "The volatility spillover between battery metals and future mobility stocks: Evidence from the time-varying frequency connectedness approach," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PA).
    19. Liu, Wen & Hu, Weihao & Lund, Henrik & Chen, Zhe, 2013. "Electric vehicles and large-scale integration of wind power – The case of Inner Mongolia in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 445-456.
    20. Verdolini, Elena & Vona, Francesco & Popp, David, 2018. "Bridging the gap: Do fast-reacting fossil technologies facilitate renewable energy diffusion?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 242-256.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2024:i:1:p:196-:d:1556916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.