IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i12p9347-d1167665.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Critical Peak Price Decision Optimization Considering Industrial Consumer’s Risk Appetite under the Carbon Neutrality Goal

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaobao Yu

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 200090, China)

  • Zhenyu Dong

    (School of Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai 200090, China)

  • Dandan Zheng

    (Power China, Guiyang Engineering Corporation Limited, Guiyang 550081, China)

Abstract

The existing research on critical peak price (CPP) decision-making ignores the difference in risk appetite between industries within the consumer population, resulting in a serious lag in the enthusiasm of some users to respond to CPP, and unsatisfactory improvement of power systems and carbon emission reduction on the supply and demand side. Firstly, the problem of consumer risk appetite was comprehensively analyzed, and the industrial consumer population was secondarily stratified according to the influencing factors and the enthusiasm of responding to CPP, namely: stubborn, active and conformist, and quantitatively verified by cluster analysis. Secondly, by combing the relevant paths of CPP decision-making, the critical-peak window determination model and CPP multi-objective optimization model were constructed, and the calculation of relevant indicators was introduced. Finally, taking 10 industrial enterprises in a city in Sichuan Province as an example, the clustering method was used to verify the stratification results, and the index analysis method was used to measure the load and carbon emission improvement of two typical enterprises after CPP optimization. The results showed that the stubborn users insist on using electricity, the improvement effect of load and carbon emission reduction was poor, and additional production costs will be caused. The conformist and active users had high sensitivity to electricity price fluctuations, good load and carbon emission reduction improvement effects, and significantly reduced electricity costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaobao Yu & Zhenyu Dong & Dandan Zheng, 2023. "Research on Critical Peak Price Decision Optimization Considering Industrial Consumer’s Risk Appetite under the Carbon Neutrality Goal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9347-:d:1167665
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9347/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/12/9347/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Xuemei & Li, Cao & Fang, Xingming & Zhang, Ning, 2021. "Price sensitivity and consumers’ support for renewable energy in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    2. Karmellos, M. & Kopidou, D. & Diakoulaki, D., 2016. "A decomposition analysis of the driving factors of CO2 (Carbon dioxide) emissions from the power sector in the European Union countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 680-692.
    3. Mousavi, Babak & Lopez, Neil Stephen A. & Biona, Jose Bienvenido Manuel & Chiu, Anthony S.F. & Blesl, Markus, 2017. "Driving forces of Iran's CO2 emissions from energy consumption: An LMDI decomposition approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 804-814.
    4. Diankai Wang & Inna Gryshova & Mykola Kyzym & Tetiana Salashenko & Viktoriia Khaustova & Maryna Shcherbata, 2022. "Electricity Price Instability over Time: Time Series Analysis and Forecasting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-24, July.
    5. Muqaddas Naz & Zafar Iqbal & Nadeem Javaid & Zahoor Ali Khan & Wadood Abdul & Ahmad Almogren & Atif Alamri, 2018. "Efficient Power Scheduling in Smart Homes Using Hybrid Grey Wolf Differential Evolution Optimization Technique with Real Time and Critical Peak Pricing Schemes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, February.
    6. Lu, Qing & Zhang, Yufeng, 2022. "A multi-objective optimization model considering users' satisfaction and multi-type demand response in dynamic electricity price," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    7. Haitao Hou & Bo Xie & Yingying Cheng, 2023. "Analysis of Carbon Emissions and Emission Reduction from Coal-Fired Power Plants Based on Dual Carbon Targets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-14, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuxin Liu & Jing Xu & Chaojian Xing & Yang Liu & Ersheng Tian & Jia Cui & Junzhu Wei, 2023. "Study on Dynamic Pricing Strategy for Industrial Power Users Considering Demand Response Differences in Master–Slave Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wakiyama, Takako & Zusman, Eric, 2021. "The impact of electricity market reform and subnational climate policy on carbon dioxide emissions across the United States: A path analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    2. Md. Afzal Hossain & Jean Engo & Songsheng Chen, 2021. "The main factors behind Cameroon’s CO2 emissions before, during and after the economic crisis of the 1980s," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 4500-4520, March.
    3. Viktor Koval & Viktoriia Khaustova & Stella Lippolis & Olha Ilyash & Tetiana Salashenko & Piotr Olczak, 2023. "Fundamental Shifts in the EU’s Electric Power Sector Development: LMDI Decomposition Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-22, July.
    4. Karmellos, M. & Kosmadakis, V. & Dimas, P. & Tsakanikas, A. & Fylaktos, N. & Taliotis, C. & Zachariadis, T., 2021. "A decomposition and decoupling analysis of carbon dioxide emissions from electricity generation: Evidence from the EU-27 and the UK," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    5. Goh, Tian & Ang, B.W. & Xu, X.Y., 2018. "Quantifying drivers of CO2 emissions from electricity generation – Current practices and future extensions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 1191-1204.
    6. Juan David Rivera-Niquepa & Daniela Rojas-Lozano & Paulo M. De Oliveira-De Jesus & Jose M. Yusta, 2022. "Decomposition Analysis of the Aggregate Carbon Intensity (ACI) of the Power Sector in Colombia—A Multi-Temporal Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-18, October.
    7. Wankeun Oh & Jonghyun Yoo, 2020. "Long-Term Increases and Recent Slowdowns of CO 2 Emissions in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Pin Li & Jinsuo Zhang, 2019. "Is China’s Energy Supply Sustainable? New Research Model Based on the Exponential Smoothing and GM(1,1) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    9. Wang, Tonghe & Hua, Haochen & Shi, Tianying & Wang, Rui & Sun, Yizhong & Naidoo, Pathmanathan, 2024. "A bi-level dispatch optimization of multi-microgrid considering green electricity consumption willingness under renewable portfolio standard policy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    10. Wang, Han & Xiang, Youzhen & Liao, Zhenqi & Wang, Xin & Zhang, Xueyan & Huang, Xiangyang & Zhang, Fucang & Feng, Li, 2024. "Integrated assessment of water-nitrogen management for winter oilseed rape production in Northwest China," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    11. Ang, B.W. & Goh, Tian, 2019. "Index decomposition analysis for comparing emission scenarios: Applications and challenges," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 74-87.
    12. Solaymani, Saeed, 2019. "CO2 emissions patterns in 7 top carbon emitter economies: The case of transport sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 989-1001.
    13. Shujaat Abbas & Hazrat Yousaf & Shabeer Khan & Mohd Ziaur Rehman & Dmitri Blueschke, 2023. "Analysis and Projection of Transport Sector Demand for Energy and Carbon Emission: An Application of the Grey Model in Pakistan," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, March.
    14. Li, He & Wang, Pengyu & Fang, Debin, 2024. "Differentiated pricing for the retail electricity provider optimizing demand response to renewable energy fluctuations," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    15. van Megen, Bram & Bürer, Meinrad & Patel, Martin K., 2019. "Comparing electricity consumption trends: A multilevel index decomposition analysis of the Genevan and Swiss economy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1-25.
    16. Mousavi, Babak & Lopez, Neil Stephen A. & Biona, Jose Bienvenido Manuel & Chiu, Anthony S.F. & Blesl, Markus, 2017. "Driving forces of Iran's CO2 emissions from energy consumption: An LMDI decomposition approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 804-814.
    17. Hongli Zhang & Lei Shen & Shuai Zhong & Ayman Elshkaki, 2020. "Economic Structure Transformation and Low-Carbon Development in Energy-Rich Cities: The Case of the Contiguous Area of Shanxi and Shaanxi Provinces, and Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, March.
    18. Isik, Mine & Ari, Izzet & Sarica, Kemal, 2021. "Challenges in the CO2 emissions of the Turkish power sector: Evidence from a two-level decomposition approach," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Weihua Su & Yuying Wang & Dalia Streimikiene & Tomas Balezentis & Chonghui Zhang, 2020. "Carbon dioxide emission decomposition along the gradient of economic development: The case of energy sustainability in the G7 and Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(4), pages 657-669, July.
    20. Govorukha, Kristina & Mayer, Philip & Rübbelke, Dirk & Vögele, Stefan, 2020. "Economic disruptions in long-term energy scenarios – Implications for designing energy policy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:12:p:9347-:d:1167665. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.