IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3584-d1382098.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Review Valence Shapes Visit Intention: Affective Commitment and Destination Reputation

Author

Listed:
  • Yagang Zhao

    (Business School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)

  • Binli Tang

    (College of Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
    Research Institute for Educational Tourism, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China)

  • Xiaojie Yang

    (School of Tourism and Urban-Rural Planning, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Jeroen Nawijn

    (Centre for Sustainability, Tourism and Transport, Breda University of Applied Sciences, 4817 JS Breda, The Netherlands)

Abstract

In the era of social media, online reviews have become a crucial factor influencing the exposure of tourist destinations and the decision-making of potential tourists, exerting a profound impact on the sustainable development of these destinations. However, the influence of review valence on visit intention, especially the role of affective commitment and reputation (ability vs. responsibility), remains unclear. Drawing on emotion as a social information theory, this paper aims to elucidate the direct impact of different review valences on tourists’ visit intentions, as well as mediating mechanisms and boundary conditions. Three experiments indicate that positive (vs. negative) reviews can activate stronger affective commitment and visit intention, with affective commitment also playing a mediating role. Additionally, destination reputation significantly moderates the after-effects of review valences. More specifically, a responsibility reputation (compared with an ability reputation) weakens the effect of negative valence on affective commitment and visit intention. This study provides valuable theoretical insights into how emotional elements in online reviews influence the emotions and attitudes of potential tourists. Particularly for tourism managers, review valence and responsibility reputation hold practical significance in destination marketing.

Suggested Citation

  • Yagang Zhao & Binli Tang & Xiaojie Yang & Jeroen Nawijn, 2024. "How Review Valence Shapes Visit Intention: Affective Commitment and Destination Reputation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3584-:d:1382098
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3584/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3584/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iglesias, Oriol & Markovic, Stefan & Rialp, Josep, 2019. "How does sensory brand experience influence brand equity? Considering the roles of customer satisfaction, customer affective commitment, and employee empathy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 343-354.
    2. Wu, Ruhai & Qiu, Chun, 2023. "When Karma strikes back: A model of seller manipulation of consumer reviews in an online marketplace," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PB).
    3. Ahluwalia, Rohini, 2002. "How Prevalent Is the Negativity Effect in Consumer Environments?," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 29(2), pages 270-279, September.
    4. Su, Lujun & Hsu, Maxwell K. & Boostrom, Robert E., 2020. "From recreation to responsibility: Increasing environmentally responsible behavior in tourism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 557-573.
    5. Chris Forman & Anindya Ghose & Batia Wiesenfeld, 2008. "Examining the Relationship Between Reviews and Sales: The Role of Reviewer Identity Disclosure in Electronic Markets," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(3), pages 291-313, September.
    6. Abubakar Mohammed Abubakar, 2016. "Does eWOM influence destination trust and travel intention: a medical tourism perspective," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(1), pages 598-611, January.
    7. Ahluwalia, Rohini, 2000. "Examination of Psychological Processes Underlying Resistance to Persuasion," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 27(2), pages 217-232, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrew E. Wilson & Michael D. Giebelhausen & Michael K. Brady, 2017. "Negative word of mouth can be a positive for consumers connected to the brand," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 534-547, July.
    2. Raffaele Filieri & Elisabetta Raguseo & Claudio Vitari, 2018. "What moderates the influence of extremely negative ratings? The role of review and reviewer characteristics," Post-Print halshs-01923196, HAL.
    3. Purnawirawan, Nathalia & De Pelsmacker, Patrick & Dens, Nathalie, 2012. "Balance and Sequence in Online Reviews: How Perceived Usefulness Affects Attitudes and Intentions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(4), pages 244-255.
    4. Srivastava, Vartika & Kalro, Arti D., 2019. "Enhancing the Helpfulness of Online Consumer Reviews: The Role of Latent (Content) Factors," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 33-50.
    5. Harrison-Walker, L. Jean & Jiang, Ying, 2023. "Suspicion of online product reviews as fake: Cues and consequences," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    6. Choi, Jungsil & Madhavaram, Sreedhar R. & Park, Hyun Young, 2020. "The Role of Hedonic and Utilitarian Motives on the Effectiveness of Partitioned Pricing," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 251-265.
    7. Kick, Markus, 2015. "Social Media Research: A Narrative Review," EconStor Preprints 182506, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Raffaele Filieri & Elisabetta Raguseo & Claudio Vitari, 2018. "What moderates the influence of extremely negative ratings? The role of review and reviewer characteristics," Grenoble Ecole de Management (Post-Print) halshs-01923196, HAL.
    9. Srikanth Parameswaran & Pubali Mukherjee & Rohit Valecha, 2023. "I Like My Anonymity: An Empirical Investigation of the Effect of Multidimensional Review Text and Role Anonymity on Helpfulness of Employer Reviews," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 853-870, April.
    10. Young-Jin Lee & Kartik Hosanagar & Yong Tan, 2015. "Do I Follow My Friends or the Crowd? Information Cascades in Online Movie Ratings," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(9), pages 2241-2258, September.
    11. Mohammadreza Mousavizadeh & Mehrdad Koohikamali & Mohammad Salehan & Dam J. Kim, 2022. "An Investigation of Peripheral and Central Cues of Online Customer Review Voting and Helpfulness through the Lens of Elaboration Likelihood Model," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 211-231, February.
    12. Yu, Xiaolei & Yuan, Chunlin & Kim, Juran & Wang, Shuman, 2021. "A new form of brand experience in online social networks: An empirical analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 426-435.
    13. Mariani, Marcello M. & Fosso Wamba, Samuel, 2020. "Exploring how consumer goods companies innovate in the digital age: The role of big data analytics companies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 338-352.
    14. KUMRU Uyar & YUNUS Dursun, 2015. "Consumer Ethnocentrism And Brand Name Evaluations," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 67(1), pages 80-89, February.
    15. Meghisan-Toma Georgeta-Madalina & Toma Dorin, 2019. "Health Determinants and Unmet Needs for Health Care- towards e-Health Systems," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 13(1), pages 1045-1057, May.
    16. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    17. Li, Hui & Xu, Yunjie & Huang, Lihua, 2021. "When less is more? The contingent effect of product supply limitation in the release of new electronic products," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    18. Irina Heimbach & Oliver Hinz, 2018. "The Impact of Sharing Mechanism Design on Content Sharing in Online Social Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 29(3), pages 592-611, September.
    19. Chris Hydock & Neeru Paharia & T. J. Weber, 2019. "The Consumer Response to Corporate Political Advocacy: a Review and Future Directions," Customer Needs and Solutions, Springer;Institute for Sustainable Innovation and Growth (iSIG), vol. 6(3), pages 76-83, December.
    20. Mahesh Balan U & Saji K. Mathew, 2021. "Personalize, Summarize or Let them Read? A Study on Online Word of Mouth Strategies and Consumer Decision Process," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 627-647, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3584-:d:1382098. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.