IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i8p3133-d1372729.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges for Sustainable Urban Planning: A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Complex Landslide Risk in a Latin American Megacity

Author

Listed:
  • Germán Vargas-Cuervo

    (Departamento de Geografía, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota E-111321, Colombia)

  • Yolanda Teresa Hernández-Peña

    (Maestría en Desarrollo Sustentable y Gestión Ambiental, Facultad del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogota E-110321, Colombia)

  • Carlos Alfonso Zafra-Mejía

    (Grupo de Investigación en Ingeniería Ambiental, Facultad del Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas, Bogota E-110321, Colombia)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the spatiotemporal evolution of a complex landslide risk scenario in a Latin American megacity, underscoring the key challenges it poses for sustainable urban planning in such cities. This research draws upon multiple studies commissioned by the mayor’s office of the megacity of Bogota, Colombia, and utilizes aerial photographs and satellite imagery from diverse sensor types. The methodology used considered six spatiotemporal analysis scenarios: rural/natural, mining, urban, landslide risk, stabilization and environmental park, and informal reoccupation. The findings reveal a complex interplay between the megacity’s peripheral areas, which face constraints for human settlement, and their potential for construction material exploitation. This complex relationship was further compounded by weaknesses in planning and controlling peripheral occupations, coupled with a burgeoning demand for developable land in a landslide risk context (landslide area: 73 ha). The analysis scenarios highlighted the predominant use of a reactive urban planning approach that addressed events, changes, or problems after they had occurred, rather than proactively anticipating and preventing potential risks at the study site. The detected land-use transformations unveiled different historical moments, culminating in a landslide disaster (804 houses destroyed, 3000 families at risk). This catastrophe necessitated a radical and significant intervention, incurring substantial costs for the megacity administration (USD 26.05 million). This landslide was the largest recorded in the megacity and one of the most extensive in urban areas across Latin America.

Suggested Citation

  • Germán Vargas-Cuervo & Yolanda Teresa Hernández-Peña & Carlos Alfonso Zafra-Mejía, 2024. "Challenges for Sustainable Urban Planning: A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Complex Landslide Risk in a Latin American Megacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3133-:d:1372729
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/8/3133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sadegh Fathi & Hassan Sajadzadeh & Faezeh Mohammadi Sheshkal & Farshid Aram & Gergo Pinter & Imre Felde & Amir Mosavi, 2020. "The Role of Urban Morphology Design on Enhancing Physical Activity and Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-29, March.
    2. Manuel Arias-Maldonado, 2020. "COVID-19 as a Global Risk: Confronting the Ambivalences of a Socionatural Threat," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Helen Pineo & Nici Zimmermann & Michael Davies, 2020. "Integrating health into the complex urban planning policy and decision-making context: a systems thinking analysis," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(1), pages 1-14, December.
    4. Aynur Uluç Keçik & Canan Çiftçi & Şirin Gülcen Eren & Aslı Tepecik Diş & Agatino Rizzo, 2023. "Determination and Evaluation of Landslide-Prone Regions of Isparta (Turkey): An Urban Planning View," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Terry Cannon & Detlef Müller-Mahn, 2010. "Vulnerability, resilience and development discourses in context of climate change," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 55(3), pages 621-635, December.
    6. T. Nochta & L. Wan & J. M. Schooling & A. K. Parlikad, 2021. "A Socio-Technical Perspective on Urban Analytics: The Case of City-Scale Digital Twins," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1-2), pages 263-287, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Raquel Nunes, 2021. "Exploring the interactions between vulnerability, resilience and adaptation to extreme temperatures," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 109(3), pages 2261-2293, December.
    2. Busby, Joshua & Smith, Todd G. & Krishnan, Nisha & Wight, Charles & Vallejo-Gutierrez, Santiago, 2018. "In harm's way: Climate security vulnerability in Asia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 88-118.
    3. Schipper, E.L.F. & Tanner, T. & Dube, O.P. & Adams, K.M. & Huq, S., 2020. "The debate: Is global development adapting to climate change?," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 18(C).
    4. Christophe Béné & Alex Cornelius & Fanny Howland, 2018. "Bridging Humanitarian Responses and Long-Term Development through Transformative Changes—Some Initial Reflections from the World Bank’s Adaptive Social Protection Program in the Sahel," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Riyanti Djalante & Cameron Holley & Frank Thomalla & Michelle Carnegie, 2013. "Pathways for adaptive and integrated disaster resilience," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(3), pages 2105-2135, December.
    6. Anna-Katharina Rieger, 2023. "Water as a Problem and a Solution in Arid Landscapes: Resilient Practices and Adapted Land Use in the Eastern Marmarica (NW-Egypt) between the 2nd Millennium BCE and the 1st Millennium CE," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-35, May.
    7. Maiju Palosaari & Antti Autio & Elizabeth Mbinga & Petri Pellikka & Tino Johansson, 2024. "The biased narrative of vulnerable women: gender analysis of smallholder farmers’ contextual vulnerability to climate change in the Taita Hills, Kenya," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 29(6), pages 1-29, August.
    8. Hare Krisna Kundo & Martin Brueckner & Rochelle Spencer & John Davis, 2021. "Mainstreaming climate adaptation into social protection: The issues yet to be addressed," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 953-974, August.
    9. Carlos Miguel Ferreira & Sandro Serpa, 2020. "COVID-19 and Social Sciences," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-3, December.
    10. Wilson, Geoff A. & Schermer, Markus & Stotten, Rike, 2018. "The resilience and vulnerability of remote mountain communities: The case of Vent, Austrian Alps," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 372-383.
    11. Giuseppe Salvia & Irene Pluchinotta & Ioanna Tsoulou & Gemma Moore & Nici Zimmermann, 2022. "Understanding Urban Green Space Usage through Systems Thinking: A Case Study in Thamesmead, London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-24, February.
    12. Alessandra Battisti & Maria Valese & Herbert Natta, 2022. "Indicators as Mediators for Environmental Decision Making: The Case Study of Alessandria," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Moshood, Taofeeq D. & Rotimi, James OB. & Shahzad, Wajiha & Bamgbade, J.A., 2024. "Infrastructure digital twin technology: A new paradigm for future construction industry," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. Philip Camill & Maryellen Hearn & Krista Bahm & Eileen Johnson, 2012. "Using a boundary organization approach to develop a sea level rise and storm surge impact analysis framework for coastal communities in Maine," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 2(2), pages 111-130, June.
    15. Astrid Molenveld & Arwin Buuren & Gerald-Jan Ellen, 2020. "Governance of climate adaptation, which mode? An exploration of stakeholder viewpoints on how to organize adaptation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 162(2), pages 233-254, September.
    16. Cristiano, S. & Ulgiati, S. & Gonella, F., 2021. "Systemic sustainability and resilience assessment of health systems, addressing global societal priorities: Learnings from a top nonprofit hospital in a bioclimatic building in Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Minou Weijs-Perrée & Gamze Dane & Pauline van den Berg, 2021. "Editorial for the Special Issue on “Experiencing the City: The Relation between Urban Design and People’s Well-Being”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-6, March.
    18. Christophe Béné & Derek Headey & Lawrence Haddad & Klaus Grebmer, 2016. "Is resilience a useful concept in the context of food security and nutrition programmes? Some conceptual and practical considerations," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 8(1), pages 123-138, February.
    19. Mohammad Anvar Adibhesami & Hirou Karimi & Ayyoob Sharifi & Borhan Sepehri & Hassan Bazazzadeh & Umberto Berardi, 2022. "Optimization of Urban-Scale Sustainable Energy Strategies to Improve Citizens’ Health," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, December.
    20. C. Béné & Luc Doyen, 2018. "From Resistance to Transformation: A Generic Metric of Resilience Through Viability," Post-Print hal-03118040, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:3133-:d:1372729. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.