IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i6p2390-d1356384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Joint Electricity Market-Clearing Mechanism for Flexible Ramping Products with a Convex Spot Market Model

Author

Listed:
  • Senpeng Gao

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Power System Optimization and Energy-Saving Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Xiaoqing Bai

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Power System Optimization and Energy-Saving Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Qinghua Shang

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Power System Optimization and Energy-Saving Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Zonglong Weng

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Power System Optimization and Energy-Saving Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Yinghe Wu

    (Guangxi Key Laboratory of Power System Optimization and Energy-Saving Technology, School of Electrical Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

Abstract

A high proportion of renewable energy access makes the net load of the power system volatile and uncertain, increasing the demand for the ramping capacity of the power system. Traditional electricity spot markets compensate for the power imbalances caused by an insufficient ramping capacity through traditional flexibility services such as ancillary services and interconnection power. However, conventional flexibility services may lead to frequency deviations in the power system, increased response costs, spikes in electricity prices, and dramatic price volatility in the traditional spot market. To solve the above problems, this paper proposes an FRP and convex electricity spot market joint clearing (FCESMJC) market mechanism. The FCESMJC model can more accurately represent the relationship between electrical power output and the price of electricity and reduces the number of spikes in electricity prices. In addition, a novel FRP pricing method is proposed to compensate FRP market participants for their FRP costs more reasonably. Additionally, the difference in system performance is provided by comparing the energy prices, pricing method, clearing prices, and system costs in the FCESMJC method and the traditional electricity spot market. The FCESMJC system reduces the total system cost by 18.6% compared with the electricity spot market. Numerical experiments are simulated on the IEEE 14-bus test system to validate the superiority of the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Senpeng Gao & Xiaoqing Bai & Qinghua Shang & Zonglong Weng & Yinghe Wu, 2024. "A Joint Electricity Market-Clearing Mechanism for Flexible Ramping Products with a Convex Spot Market Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-25, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2390-:d:1356384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2390/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/6/2390/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Burak Kocuk & Santanu S. Dey & X. Andy Sun, 2016. "Strong SOCP Relaxations for the Optimal Power Flow Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1177-1196, December.
    2. Seong-Hyeon Cha & Sun-Hyeok Kwak & Woong Ko, 2023. "A Robust Optimization Model of Aggregated Resources Considering Serving Ratio for Providing Reserve Power in the Joint Electricity Market," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-27, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Savelli, Iacopo & Morstyn, Thomas, 2021. "Electricity prices and tariffs to keep everyone happy: A framework for fixed and nodal prices coexistence in distribution grids with optimal tariffs for investment cost recovery," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    2. Skolfield, J. Kyle & Escobedo, Adolfo R., 2022. "Operations research in optimal power flow: A guide to recent and emerging methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(2), pages 387-404.
    3. Guanglei Wang & Hassan Hijazi, 2018. "Mathematical programming methods for microgrid design and operations: a survey on deterministic and stochastic approaches," Computational Optimization and Applications, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 553-608, November.
    4. Amir Ahmadi-Javid & Pooya Hoseinpour, 2022. "Convexification of Queueing Formulas by Mixed-Integer Second-Order Cone Programming: An Application to a Discrete Location Problem with Congestion," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 2621-2633, September.
    5. Liu, Jia & Zeng, Peter Pingliang & Xing, Hao & Li, Yalou & Wu, Qiuwei, 2020. "Hierarchical duality-based planning of transmission networks coordinating active distribution network operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    6. Le Cadre, Hélène & Mezghani, Ilyès & Papavasiliou, Anthony, 2019. "A game-theoretic analysis of transmission-distribution system operator coordination," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(1), pages 317-339.
    7. Haoxiang Yang & David P. Morton & Chaithanya Bandi & Krishnamurthy Dvijotham, 2021. "Robust Optimization for Electricity Generation," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 336-351, January.
    8. Jay, Devika & Swarup, K.S., 2021. "A comprehensive survey on reactive power ancillary service markets," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    9. Ratha, Anubhav & Pinson, Pierre & Le Cadre, Hélène & Virag, Ana & Kazempour, Jalal, 2023. "Moving from linear to conic markets for electricity," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 762-783.
    10. Zhang, Haoyang & Zhan, Sen & Kok, Koen & Paterakis, Nikolaos G., 2024. "Establishing a hierarchical local market structure using multi-cut Benders decomposition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 363(C).
    11. Subramanian, Vignesh & Feijoo, Felipe & Sankaranarayanan, Sriram & Melendez, Kevin & Das, Tapas K., 2022. "A bilevel conic optimization model for routing and charging of EV fleets serving long distance delivery networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    12. Puming Wang & Liqin Zheng & Tianyi Diao & Shengquan Huang & Xiaoqing Bai, 2023. "Robust Bilevel Optimal Dispatch of Park Integrated Energy System Considering Renewable Energy Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-23, October.
    13. Dan Bienstock & Mauro Escobar & Claudio Gentile & Leo Liberti, 2020. "Mathematical programming formulations for the alternating current optimal power flow problem," 4OR, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 249-292, September.
    14. Wogrin, S. & Tejada-Arango, D. & Delikaraoglou, S. & Botterud, A., 2020. "Assessing the impact of inertia and reactive power constraints in generation expansion planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    15. Bichler, Martin & Knörr, Johannes, 2023. "Getting prices right on electricity spot markets: On the economic impact of advanced power flow models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    16. Iacopo Savelli & Thomas Morstyn, 2020. "Electricity prices and tariffs to keep everyone happy: a framework for fixed and nodal prices coexistence in distribution grids with optimal tariffs for investment cost recovery," Papers 2001.04283, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2021.
    17. Reza Sabzehgar & Diba Zia Amirhosseini & Saeed D. Manshadi & Poria Fajri, 2021. "Stochastic Expansion Planning of Various Energy Storage Technologies in Active Power Distribution Networks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-17, May.
    18. Harsha Nagarajan & Mowen Lu & Site Wang & Russell Bent & Kaarthik Sundar, 2019. "An adaptive, multivariate partitioning algorithm for global optimization of nonconvex programs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 639-675, August.
    19. Chen, J.J. & Wu, Q.H. & Zhang, L.L. & Wu, P.Z., 2017. "Multi-objective mean–variance–skewness model for nonconvex and stochastic optimal power flow considering wind power and load uncertainties," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 263(2), pages 719-732.
    20. Kevin-Martin Aigner & Robert Burlacu & Frauke Liers & Alexander Martin, 2023. "Solving AC Optimal Power Flow with Discrete Decisions to Global Optimality," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 458-474, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:6:p:2390-:d:1356384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.