IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10413-d1531471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Justice Considerations in the Distribution of Federal Brownfield Grants: The Impact of Income, Race, and Demographic Changes in Massachusetts (1994–2022)

Author

Listed:
  • Aaron Hinze

    (College of Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA)

  • Maria Chrysochoou

    (College of Engineering, University of Missouri, Columbia, MI 65211, USA)

Abstract

This study examines the distribution of EPA brownfield grant funding in Massachusetts from 1994 to 2022, focusing on the impact of race, income, and demographic changes. Brownfields are properties complicated by contamination, and the EPA provides grants to assess and clean these sites, promoting environmental justice and sustainability in the impacted communities. This study analyzes grant distribution across Massachusetts municipalities, comparing those with varying income levels, racial compositions, and population changes. Data were obtained from the EPA databases and U.S. Census data, with an additional analysis excluding Boston to assess the city’s impact on the trends. Key findings indicate that the municipalities with higher minority populations and lower incomes were more likely to receive brownfield funding, with larger award amounts and more sites requiring remediation. Income emerged as a stronger predictor of brownfield site prevalence than race, as the municipalities with lower incomes had significantly more sites. The removal of Boston from the dataset clarified the trends, showing that the towns with fewer income gains or minority population increases received more funding. Overall, the results suggest that EPA policies have been effective in directing funding to the communities with greater environmental justice concerns, including those with lower income and minority populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Aaron Hinze & Maria Chrysochoou, 2024. "Environmental Justice Considerations in the Distribution of Federal Brownfield Grants: The Impact of Income, Race, and Demographic Changes in Massachusetts (1994–2022)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-12, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10413-:d:1531471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10413/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10413/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nancey Leigh & Sarah Coffin, 2005. "Modeling the relationship among brownfields, property values, and community revitalization," Housing Policy Debate, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(2), pages 257-280.
    2. Richard T. Melstrom & Rose Mohammadi, 2022. "Residential Mobility, Brownfield Remediation, and Environmental Gentrification in Chicago," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 98(1), pages 62-77.
    3. Evan J. Ringquist, 2005. "Assessing evidence of environmental inequities: A meta-analysis," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 223-247.
    4. Adam Eckerd & Andrew Keeler, 2012. "Going green together? Brownfield remediation and environmental justice," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(4), pages 293-314, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alina Maciejewska & Marianna Ulanicka-Raczyńska, 2023. "Lack of Spatial Planning as a Cause of Environmental Injustice in the Context of the Provision of Health Safety to Urban Residents Based on the Example of Warsaw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Bez, Charlotte S. & Ash, Michael & Boyce, James K., 2024. "Environmental inequality in industrial brownfields: Evidence from French municipalities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    3. Sumaia A. Al‐Kohlani & Heather E. Campbell, 2022. "Extending environmental justice research to religious minorities," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(1), pages 90-112, January.
    4. Harleman, Max & Weber, Jeremy G., 2023. "Can Collective Action Institutions Outperform the State? Evidence from Treatment of Abandoned Mine Drainage," MPRA Paper 119861, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Collins, Timothy W. & Nadybal, Shawna & Grineski, Sara E., 2020. "Sonic injustice: Disparate residential exposures to transport noise from road and aviation sources in the continental United States," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Green, T.L., 2018. "Evaluating predictors for brownfield redevelopment," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 299-319.
    7. Zhaohua Zhang & Derrick Robinson & Diane Hite, 2018. "Racial Residential Segregation: Measuring Location Choice Attributes of Environmental Quality and Self-Segregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Danae Hernandez-Cortes & Kyle C. Meng & Paige Weber, 2022. "Decomposing Trends in US Air Pollution Disparities from Electricity," NBER Chapters, in: Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, volume 4, pages 91-124, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Baryshnikova, Nadezhda V., 2010. "Pollution abatement and environmental equity: A dynamic study," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(2), pages 183-190, September.
    10. Vajjhala, Shalini & Van Epps, Amanda & Szambelan, Sarah, 2008. "Integrating EJ into Federal Policies and Programs: Examining the Role of Regulatory Impact Analyses and Environmental Impact Statements," RFF Working Paper Series dp-08-45, Resources for the Future.
    11. Banzhaf, H. Spencer, 2011. "The Political Economy of Environmental Justice," MPRA Paper 101191, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Bin Zou & Fen Peng & Neng Wan & Keita Mamady & Gaines J Wilson, 2014. "Spatial Cluster Detection of Air Pollution Exposure Inequities across the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-14, March.
    13. Cory, Dennis C. & Rahman, Tauhidur, 2009. "Environmental justice and enforcement of the safe drinking water act: The Arizona arsenic experience," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1825-1837, April.
    14. Deborah F Shmueli, 2008. "Environmental Justice in the Israeli Context," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(10), pages 2384-2401, October.
    15. Parry, Ian W.H. & Sigman, Hilary & Walls, Margaret & Williams, Roberton C., III, 2005. "The Incidence of Pollution Control Policies," Discussion Papers 10651, Resources for the Future.
    16. Neal D. Woods, 2021. "The State of State Environmental Policy Research: A Thirty‐Year Progress Report," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(3), pages 347-369, May.
    17. Thi Phuoc Lai Nguyen & Salvatore G. P. Virdis & Ekbordin Winjikul, 2022. "Inequality of Low Air Quality-Related Health Impacts among Socioeconomic Groups in the World of Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-12, October.
    18. Maria-Stella Portelli & Elisabeth Conrad & Charles Galdies, 2020. "Developing an Environmental Justice Index for Small Island States: The Case of Malta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    19. Devon Reynolds & David Ciplet, 2023. "Transforming Socially Responsible Investment: Lessons from Environmental Justice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(1), pages 53-69, February.
    20. Jessica Debats Garrison, 2019. "Seeing the park for the trees: New York’s “Million Trees†campaign vs. the deep roots of environmental inequality," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 46(5), pages 914-930, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10413-:d:1531471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.