IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9891-d1519969.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Promoting Sustainable Safety Work Environments: Factors Affecting Korean Workers’ Recognition of Their Right to Refuse Dangerous Work

Author

Listed:
  • Mi-Jeong Lee

    (Department of Safety Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation, Chungju 27469, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

(1) Background: The right to refuse dangerous work (RTRDW) is essential for preventing industrial accidents and protecting worker safety in Korea. However, its use remains limited in practice. This study seeks to identify the factors hindering its activation across industries such as construction, manufacturing, and services, offering a comprehensive analysis beyond previous research. (2) Methods: A survey was conducted across key industries to assess five factors—safety behavior, communication, management commitment, education and training, and education and training—using structural equation modeling (SEM) to evaluate their influence on the exercise of RTRDW. (3) Results: The SEM model showed a good fit (χ 2 = 1151.333, p < 0.001, TLI = 0.978, CFI = 0.984, RMSEA = 0.05). The most significant factors influencing RTRDW were safety performance behavior and communication, while ambiguous regulations, poor training, and fear of job loss discouraged its use. (4) Conclusions: To improve RTRDW activation, clearer regulations, enhanced safety education and training, stronger management commitment, and better communication are necessary. Addressing these issues can help workers confidently exercise their right to refuse dangerous work, enhancing overall workplace safety. (5) Benefits: This study provides practical strategies for policymakers and industry leaders to promote safety, empowering workers to use RTRDW effectively and contributing to a safer work environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Mi-Jeong Lee, 2024. "Promoting Sustainable Safety Work Environments: Factors Affecting Korean Workers’ Recognition of Their Right to Refuse Dangerous Work," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9891-:d:1519969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9891/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9891/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edgar H. Schein, 1990. "Organizational Culture: What it is and How to Change it," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Paul Evans & Yves Doz & André Laurent (ed.), Human Resource Management in International Firms, chapter 0, pages 56-82, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Henry Kaiser, 1970. "A second generation little jiffy," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 35(4), pages 401-415, December.
    3. Frank W. Guldenmund, 2010. "(Mis)understanding Safety Culture and Its Relationship to Safety Management," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(10), pages 1466-1480, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tabesh, Pooya & Mousavidin, Elham & Hasani, Sona, 2019. "Implementing big data strategies: A managerial perspective," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 62(3), pages 347-358.
    2. Andrea C Vial & Janine Bosak & Patrick C Flood & John F Dovidio, 2021. "Individual variation in role construal predicts responses to third-party biases in hiring contexts," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-28, February.
    3. Siwarit Pongsakornrungsilp & Pimlapas Pongsakornrungsilp & Theeranuch Pusaksrikit & Pimmada Wichasin & Vikas Kumar, 2021. "Co-Creating a Sustainable Regional Brand from Multiple Sub-Brands: The Andaman Tourism Cluster of Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Bangyi Yan & Shiguang Ni & Xi Wang & Jin Liu & Qianjing Zhang & Kaiping Peng, 2020. "Using Virtual Reality to Validate the Chinese Version of the Independent Television Commission-Sense of Presence Inventory," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(2), pages 21582440209, May.
    5. Christoph, Inken B. & Roosen, Jutta & Bruhn, Maike, 2006. "Willingness to pay for genetically modified food and non-food products," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21303, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Stefan Köngeter & Timo Schreiner, 2023. "Towards Inclusion: Systemic Change Through Organizational Education," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 11(2), pages 115-123.
    7. Chetan Doddamani & M. Manoj, 2023. "Analysis of the influences of built environment measures on household car and motorcycle ownership decisions in Hubli-Dharwad cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 205-243, February.
    8. Marcin Chlebus, 2014. "One-day prediction of state of turbulence for financial instrument based on models for binary dependent variable," Ekonomia journal, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw, vol. 37.
    9. Adamonienė Rūta & Litavniece Lienite & Ruibytė Laima & Viduolienė Evelina, 2021. "Influence of individual and organisational variables on the perception of organisational values," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 13(2), pages 7-17, June.
    10. Faheem Ahmed & Luiz Fernando Capretz, 2011. "A business maturity model of software product line engineering," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 543-560, September.
    11. Libin Yang & William Rea & Alethea Rea, 2015. "How much diversification potential is there in a single market? Evidence from the Australian Stock Exchange," Working Papers in Economics 15/07, University of Canterbury, Department of Economics and Finance.
    12. Firican Diana Andreea, 2022. "The Influence of Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions on Attitude Towards Change and Innovation in Oganizations," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 509-518, August.
    13. Ben-Shahar, Danny & Golan, Roni, 2014. "Real estate and personality," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 111-119.
    14. Cortés-Sánchez, Julián David & Grueso, Merlin Patricia, 2017. "Factor analysis evaluation of Schein's career orientation inventory in Colombia," OSF Preprints jf5nq, Center for Open Science.
    15. Belén Casales Morici, 2022. "Strategic corporate entrepreneurship practices in financial services firms: the role of organizational factors," SN Business & Economics, Springer, vol. 2(9), pages 1-26, September.
    16. Pirozzi Maria Grazia & Agliata Francesco & Tuccillo Danilo & Pirozzi Francesco, 2021. "Defining the Integrated Performance Measurement Systems in Small and Medium Enterprises: An Advanced Model," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(12), pages 203-203, July.
    17. Francisco Rejón-Guardia & Juán Sánchez-Fernández & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva, 2011. "Motivational Factors that influence the Acceptance of Microblogging Social Networks: The µBAM Model," FEG Working Paper Series 06/11, Faculty of Economics and Business (University of Granada).
    18. Ye, Shi & Chen, Qun & Tang, Yi, 2023. "Anger between bus drivers and passengers or among passengers: Development of a bus passenger anger scale (BPAS) and a bus driver anger scale (BDAS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    19. Swati Dhir, 2024. "Developing a Scale to Measure Institutional Effectiveness in the Context of Indian Business Schools: Using Exploratory Factor Analysis," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 25(2_suppl), pages 23-41, April.
    20. Alessandro Bitetto & Paola Cerchiello & Charilaos Mertzanis, 2021. "A data-driven approach to measuring epidemiological susceptibility risk around the world," DEM Working Papers Series 200, University of Pavia, Department of Economics and Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9891-:d:1519969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.