IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9731-d1516589.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining Divergent Sustainable Trends in Textbook Research: A Comparative Study Between Chinese and International Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Xuanyi Qu

    (Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, No. 5268, Renmin Street, Changchun 130024, China)

  • Xuyuan Chen

    (Faculty of Education, Northeast Normal University, No. 5268, Renmin Street, Changchun 130024, China)

Abstract

Textbook research has long been a critical area within the educational academic community. With the ongoing spread of globalization, the significance of educational globalization has become increasingly apparent. Comparative analyses of textbooks from different countries have thus emerged as a popular and critical research topic. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in cross-cultural textbook studies, highlighting the need for a deeper understanding of global disparities in this field. This study compiles essential findings from both domestic and international textbook research, aiming to uncover differences and trends. Using CiteSpace software (V.6.2.R4), a comprehensive visual analysis was conducted through bibliometric and knowledge graph methods, comparing Chinese and international textbook research over the past decade (2013–2023). This paper presents an intuitive visual map of the key dynamics in textbook research. Utilizing a quantitative approach, this study analyzed 1644 and 1478 relevant articles from the Web of Science (WoS) and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases, respectively. It examined the annual distribution, core contributors, and institutional co-occurrence of textbook research from 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2023, identifying the distinctive characteristics of textbook research both in China and internationally. Additionally, CiteSpace’s built-in algorithm was used to extract keywords and highlight primary research areas, while keyword burst detection was utilized to illustrate developmental trends. The analysis revealed key differences between Chinese and international textbook research in terms of research focus, organizational forms, focal areas, and future development trends. This study also discusses potential future directions in this area, such as establishing a systematic framework for textbook research, fostering a global community of textbook scholars, and integrating localized elements into textbook research. Additionally, it highlights the importance of sustainability in textbook research, emphasizing the need for educational materials that support long-term global educational goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuanyi Qu & Xuyuan Chen, 2024. "Examining Divergent Sustainable Trends in Textbook Research: A Comparative Study Between Chinese and International Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-25, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9731-:d:1516589
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9731/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9731/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaomei Chen, 2006. "CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 57(3), pages 359-377, February.
    2. Wen-Jie Yan & Ke-Run Li, 2023. "Sustainable Cultural Innovation Practice: Heritage Education in Universities and Creative Inheritance of Intangible Cultural Heritage Craft," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-20, January.
    3. Jiazhen Zhang & Jeremy Cenci & Vincent Becue & Sesil Koutra & Christos S. Ioakimidis, 2020. "Recent Evolution of Research on Industrial Heritage in Western Europe and China Based on Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wen-Jie Yan & Shu-Tang Liu, 2023. "Creative Economy and Sustainable Development: Shaping Flexible Cultural Governance Model for Creativity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-28, February.
    2. Duo Yang & Jincheng Zhou & Dingpu Shi & Qingna Pan & Dan Wang & Xiaohong Chen & Jiu Liu, 2022. "Research Status, Hotspots, and Evolutionary Trends of Global Digital Education via Knowledge Graph Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    3. Tingcan Ma & Ruinan Li & Guiyan Ou & Mingliang Yue, 2018. "Topic based research competitiveness evaluation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(2), pages 789-803, November.
    4. Jacob Wood & Gohar Feroz Khan, 2015. "International trade negotiation analysis: network and semantic knowledge infrastructure," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 537-556, October.
    5. Daniel Fonseca Costa & Francisval Carvalho & Bruno César Moreira & José Willer Prado, 2017. "Bibliometric analysis on the association between behavioral finance and decision making with cognitive biases such as overconfidence, anchoring effect and confirmation bias," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1775-1799, June.
    6. Xingwen Chen & Li Zhu & Chao Liu & Chunhua Chen & Jun Liu & Dongxia Huo, 2023. "Workplace Diversity in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Review of Literature and Directions for Future Research," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 1021-1045, September.
    7. Ziwen Wei & Man Yuan, 2023. "Research on the Current Situation and Future Development Trend of Immersive Virtual Reality in the Field of Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Hrosul, Viktoriia & Kruhlova, Olena & Kolesnyk, Alina, 2023. "Digitalization of the agricultural sector: the impact of ICT on the development of enterprises in Ukraine," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 9(4), December.
    9. Yucheng Zhang & Zhiling Wang & Lin Xiao & Lijun Wang & Pei Huang, 2023. "Discovering the evolution of online reviews: A bibliometric review," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    10. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    11. Petersen, Alexander M. & Rotolo, Daniele & Leydesdorff, Loet, 2016. "A triple helix model of medical innovation: Supply, demand, and technological capabilities in terms of Medical Subject Headings," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 666-681.
    12. Tong Chen & Mo Wang & Jin Su & Jianjun Li, 2023. "Unlocking the Positive Impact of Bio-Swales on Hydrology, Water Quality, and Biodiversity: A Bibliometric Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-19, May.
    13. Gao, Qiang & Liang, Zhentao & Wang, Ping & Hou, Jingrui & Chen, Xiuxiu & Liu, Manman, 2021. "Potential index: Revealing the future impact of research topics based on current knowledge networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 15(3).
    14. Hailiang Li & M. James C. Crabbe & Haikui Chen, 2020. "History and Trends in Ecological Stoichiometry Research from 1992 to 2019: A Scientometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Nina Sakinah Ahmad Rofaie & Seuk Wai Phoong & Muzalwana Abdul Talib & Ainin Sulaiman, 2023. "Light-emitting diode (LED) research: A bibliometric analysis during 2003–2018," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 173-191, February.
    16. Serhat Burmaoglu & Ozcan Saritas, 2019. "An evolutionary analysis of the innovation policy domain: Is there a paradigm shift?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 118(3), pages 823-847, March.
    17. Yanrong Qiu & Kaihuai Liao & Yanting Zou & Gengzhi Huang, 2022. "A Bibliometric Analysis on Research Regarding Residential Segregation and Health Based on CiteSpace," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Yutong Zhang & Wei Zhou & Danxue Luo, 2023. "The Relationship Research between Biodiversity Conservation and Economic Growth: From Multi-Level Attempts to Key Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    19. Yi-Ming Wei & Jin-Wei Wang & Tianqi Chen & Bi-Ying Yu & Hua Liao, 2018. "Frontiers of Low-Carbon Technologies: Results from Bibliographic Coupling with Sliding Window," CEEP-BIT Working Papers 116, Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research (CEEP), Beijing Institute of Technology.
    20. Souzanchi Kashani, Ebrahim & Roshani, Saeed, 2019. "Evolution of innovation system literature: Intellectual bases and emerging trends," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 68-80.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9731-:d:1516589. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.