IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p10037-d1523194.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation of University Students’ Perceptions of Learning Management Systems: Insights for Enhancing Usability and Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Ahlam I. Almusharraf

    (Department of Management, College of Business Administration, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Learning management systems (LMS) have become central to modern education, enabling accessible, personalized, and engaging learning experiences. This study aims to investigate Saudi university students’ perception of LMS in order to explore the critical factors that shape their engagement, satisfaction, and acceptance of these platforms. Drawing from the existing literature that points out the usability challenges of LMS, this study hopes to derive actionable insights to optimize e-learning outcomes. Using Kelly’s repertory grid analysis technique, this study systematically captured and analyzed the personal constructs students associate with LMS, focusing on ease of use, interactivity, and content alignment with educational needs. A sample of 20 university students provided insights on their experiences with LMS features related to usability, functionality, and interactivity, which are critical to engagement. Findings indicate that ease of use is a major determinant of acceptance, along with interactivity and relevant content delivery that supports diverse learning preferences. The study identifies key elements to improve LMS platforms, fostering a more engaging digital learning environment and supporting students’ learning needs. The findings highlight the key aspects: usability of LMS and students’ satisfaction through user-friendly interfaces and interactive features. Institutions that incorporate student feedback into LMS development will likely see improved e-learning outcomes. This research contributes to a deeper understanding of LMS user perceptions and implies refinements that can align platforms with pedagogical demands in higher education.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahlam I. Almusharraf, 2024. "An Investigation of University Students’ Perceptions of Learning Management Systems: Insights for Enhancing Usability and Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-18, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:10037-:d:1523194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10037/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10037/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Patricia Alexander & Johan Loggerenberg & Hugo Lotriet & Jackie Phahlamohlaka, 2010. "The Use of the Repertory Grid for Collaboration and Reflection in a Research Context," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 479-504, September.
    2. Radhika Santhanam & Sharath Sasidharan & Jane Webster, 2008. "Using Self-Regulatory Learning to Enhance E-Learning-Based Information Technology Training," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 19(1), pages 26-47, March.
    3. Ari Ginsberg, 1989. "Construing The Business Portfolio: A Cognitive Model Of Diversification[1]," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 417-438, July.
    4. M. Gordon Hunter & John E. Beck, 2000. "Using Repertory Grids to Conduct Cross-Cultural Information Systems Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 93-101, March.
    5. Xiangmin Zhang & Mark Chignell, 2001. "Assessment of the effects of user characteristics on mental models of information retrieval systems," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 52(6), pages 445-459.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Radhika Santhanam & De Liu & Wei-Cheng Milton Shen, 2016. "Research Note—Gamification of Technology-Mediated Training: Not All Competitions Are the Same," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(2), pages 453-465, June.
    2. Emanuele Gabriel Margherita & Ilenia Bua, 2021. "The Role of Human Resource Practices for the Development of Operator 4.0 in Industry 4.0 Organisations: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 1(1), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Malin Malmström & Jeaneth Johansson & Joakim Wincent, 2015. "Cognitive Constructions of Low–Profit and High–Profit Business Models: A Repertory Grid Study of Serial Entrepreneurs," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 39(5), pages 1083-1109, September.
    4. Ar. R. T. Hidayat & Corinthias P. M. Sianipar & Shizuka Hashimoto & Satoshi Hoshino & Muhammad Dimyati & Ahmad E. Yustika, 2023. "Personal Cognition and Implicit Constructs Affecting Preferential Decisions on Farmland Ownership: Multiple Case Studies in Kediri, East Java, Indonesia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Patricia Alexander & Johan Loggerenberg & Hugo Lotriet & Jackie Phahlamohlaka, 2010. "The Use of the Repertory Grid for Collaboration and Reflection in a Research Context," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 479-504, September.
    6. Milićević Vladimir & Milovanović Slavoljub, 2015. "Training System for Crisis Management Supported by Contemporary Information Technologies," Economic Themes, Sciendo, vol. 53(3), pages 433-449, September.
    7. Kiril Dimitrov, 2014. "Geert Hofstede et al’s Set of National Cultural Dimensions - Popularity and Criticisms," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 2, pages 30-60, April.
    8. Lionel P. Robert Jr. & Tracy Ann Sykes, 2017. "Extending the Concept of Control Beliefs: Integrating the Role of Advice Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 84-96, March.
    9. Bin Zhu & Stephanie A. Watts, 2010. "Visualization of Network Concepts: The Impact of Working Memory Capacity Differences," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(2), pages 327-344, June.
    10. Hendriks, Guus & Slangen, Arjen H.L. & Heugens, Pursey P.M.A.R., 2024. "Country portfolio diversity and firms’ portfolio adjustment decisions: A behavioral perspective," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(4).
    11. Ni Huang & Lingli Wang & Yili Hong & Lihui Lin & Xunhua Guo & Guoqing Chen, 2024. "When the Clock Strikes: A Multimethod Investigation of On-the-Hour Effects in Online Learning," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 766-782, June.
    12. Yves Fassin & Andrea Werner & Annick van Rossem & Silvana Signori & Elisabeth Garriga & Heidi von Weltzien Hoivik & Hans-Jörg Schlierer, 2015. "CSR and Related Terms in SME Owner–Managers' Mental Models in Six European Countries : National Context Matters," Post-Print hal-02313143, HAL.
    13. Alvin Chung Man Leung & Radhika Santhanam & Ron Chi-Wai Kwok & Wei Thoo Yue, 2023. "Could Gamification Designs Enhance Online Learning Through Personalization? Lessons from a Field Experiment," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 27-49, March.
    14. G. Page West III, 2007. "Collective Cognition: When Entrepreneurial Teams, Not Individuals, Make Decisions," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 31(1), pages 77-102, January.
    15. Sandra A. Vannoy & A. F. Salam, 2010. "Managerial Interpretations of the Role of Information Systems in Competitive Actions and Firm Performance: A Grounded Theory Investigation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 21(3), pages 496-515, September.
    16. Masouda A. Gurban & Abeer S. Almogren, 2022. "Students’ Actual Use of E-Learning in Higher Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    17. Saurabh Gupta & Robert Bostrom, 2013. "Research Note ---An Investigation of the Appropriation of Technology-Mediated Training Methods Incorporating Enactive and Collaborative Learning," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 454-469, June.
    18. Fanan Jameel & Ahmed Agiel, 2023. "Exploring Students’ Emotional Well-Being in the Ideal University Hostel Using the Qualitative Repertory Grid Technique," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(18), pages 1-18, September.
    19. Tyge-F. Kummer & Jan Leimeister & Markus Bick, 2012. "On the Importance of National Culture for the Design of Information Systems," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 4(6), pages 317-330, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:10037-:d:1523194. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.