IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p10003-d1522384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stochastic Differential Game of Sustainable Allocation Strategy for Idle Emergency Supplies in Post-Disaster Management

Author

Listed:
  • Lingfei Li

    (School of Public Administration, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Jingyu Wu

    (School of Economics and Management, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Minting Zhu

    (School of Economics and Management, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Mancang Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Yaoyuan Li

    (School of Public Administration, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

Abstract

This study aims to explore allocation strategies for idle emergency supplies in a “demander–platform–supplier” supply chain system along with government regulation during the post-disaster recovery period. Allocation of emergency supplies is a complex task that encompasses resource allocation before and after disasters. It is essential to reduce losses in disaster-stricken areas and support development during post-disaster recovery. However, there is often an excessive supply of emergency materials and a mismatch between supply and demand sides in downstream supply chains, which may lead to severe waste and difficulties in recovering surplus materials. This paper takes idle emergency resource sharing level and corporate social responsibility goodwill as endogenous variables. The allocation approaches are dynamically evaluated by incorporating random elements that influence the endogenous variables. Three stochastic differential games are introduced to examine the interactions between the players. The centralized decision-making satisfies the consistency of overall and individual rationalities at any time in the emergency material allocation process, promoting the optimal sharing levels of emergency materials and overall profits. The decentralized decision-making with cost-sharing contracts achieves local optima and increases the dual marginal effect of the emergency industry chain. This paper incorporates the sharing economy into emergency management, showing how technology-driven sharing platforms can optimize resource utilization. The results suggest introducing cost-sharing contracts between demanders and suppliers can enhance collaboration and effort, leading to better resource allocation and increased efficiency. It contributes to sustainability by promoting efficient resource utilization through idle emergency resource sharing. By optimizing allocation strategies and enhancing corporate social responsibility, the study fosters the long-term viability and resilience of the supply chain system in post-disaster management.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingfei Li & Jingyu Wu & Minting Zhu & Mancang Wang & Yaoyuan Li, 2024. "Stochastic Differential Game of Sustainable Allocation Strategy for Idle Emergency Supplies in Post-Disaster Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-45, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:10003-:d:1522384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10003/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/10003/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin, Chris J., 2016. "The sharing economy: A pathway to sustainability or a nightmarish form of neoliberal capitalism?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 149-159.
    2. Lingfei Li & Jingyu Wu & Minting Zhu & Mancang Wang & Yaoyuan Li, 2024. "Stochastic Differential Games of Carbon Emission Reduction in the Four-Tier Supply Chain System Based on Reference Low-Carbon Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-38, October.
    3. Gonul Kochan, Cigdem & Nowicki, David R. & Sauser, Brian & Randall, Wesley S., 2018. "Impact of cloud-based information sharing on hospital supply chain performance: A system dynamics framework," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 168-185.
    4. Yi Lu & Jiuping Xu, 2014. "The progress of emergency response and rescue in China: a comparative analysis of Wenchuan and Lushan earthquakes," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 74(2), pages 421-444, November.
    5. Zhang, Juan & Gou, Qinglong & Liang, Liang & Huang, Zhimin, 2013. "Supply chain coordination through cooperative advertising with reference price effect," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 345-353.
    6. Aoqing Li & Zaiwu Gong & Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest, 2023. "Financial fund allocation in China's catastrophe insurance market: a game-theoretic analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 3181-3202, July.
    7. Jia, Zhifu & Liu, Xinsheng, 2023. "Uncertain stochastic hybrid differential game system with V-n jumps: Saddle point equilibrium strategies and application to advertising duopoly game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    8. Zhou, Quan Spring & Olsen, Tava Lennon, 2017. "Inventory rotation of medical supplies for emergency response," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 810-821.
    9. Lanying Du & Ling Qian, 2016. "The government’s mobilization strategy following a disaster in the Chinese context: an evolutionary game theory analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 80(3), pages 1411-1424, February.
    10. Lozano, S. & Moreno, P. & Adenso-Díaz, B. & Algaba, E., 2013. "Cooperative game theory approach to allocating benefits of horizontal cooperation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 444-452.
    11. Xiao, Lu & Liu, Jianyue & Ge, Jinwen, 2021. "Dynamic game in agriculture and industry cross-sectoral water pollution governance in developing countries," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    12. Na Zhao & Xiaolian Li & Nina Sun, 2024. "Correction: Industrial internet supply chain emergency capacity improvement model based on stochastic differential game," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 341(2), pages 1347-1347, October.
    13. Hao Xu & Deqing Tan, 2023. "Optimal Abatement Technology Licensing in a Dynamic Transboundary Pollution Game: Fixed Fee Versus Royalty," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 61(3), pages 905-935, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan Chen & Sen Liu & Andrea Appolloni, 2020. "Horizontal Coordination of I-LNGOs in the Humanitarian Supply Chain: An Evolutionary Game Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-21, July.
    2. Mohebbi, Shima & Li, Xueping, 2015. "Coalitional game theory approach to modeling suppliers' collaboration in supply networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 333-342.
    3. Küper, Inken & Edinger-Schons, Laura Marie, 2020. "Is sharing up for sale? Monetary exchanges in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 223-234.
    4. Mario Guajardo & Kurt Jörnsten & Mikael Rönnqvist, 2016. "Constructive and blocking power in collaborative transportation," OR Spectrum: Quantitative Approaches in Management, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research e.V., vol. 38(1), pages 25-50, January.
    5. Zhang, Lu & Cui, Li & Chen, Lujie & Dai, Jing & Jin, Ziyi & Wu, Hao, 2023. "A hybrid approach to explore the critical criteria of online supply chain finance to improve supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    6. Xiulan Jiang & Yukun Li & Jun Yang & Sen Wang & Chunjia Han, 2024. "Host–Guest Interaction and Sustainable Consumption Behaviour on Sharing-Accommodation Platforms: Using a Big Data Analytic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, June.
    7. Emmanuelle Reuter, 2022. "Hybrid business models in the sharing economy: The role of business model design for managing the environmental paradox," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 603-618, February.
    8. Bo Wang & Ning Wang, 2022. "Decision Models for a Dual-Recycling Channel Reverse Supply Chain with Consumer Strategic Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Isabel Miralles & Domenico Dentoni & Stefano Pascucci, 2017. "Understanding the organization of sharing economy in agri-food systems: evidence from alternative food networks in Valencia," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 833-854, December.
    10. Jia Liu & Cuixia Li, 2023. "Dynamic Game Analysis on Cooperative Advertising Strategy in a Manufacturer-Led Supply Chain with Risk Aversion," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, January.
    11. Qiu, Rui & Zhang, Haoran & Wang, Guotao & Liang, Yongtu & Yan, Jinyue, 2023. "Green hydrogen-based energy storage service via power-to-gas technologies integrated with multi-energy microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 350(C).
    12. Frederik Plewnia & Edeltraud Guenther, 2017. "Advancing a sustainable sharing economy with interdisciplinary research [Der Beitrag interdisziplinärer Forschung zu einer nachhaltigen Sharing Economy]," Sustainability Nexus Forum, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 117-124, June.
    13. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Everding, Sebastian, 2020. "Do hybrids impede sustainability? How semantic reorientations and governance reforms can produce and preserve sustainability in sharing business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 174-185.
    14. Valeria Andreoni, 2020. "The Trap of Success: A Paradox of Scale for Sharing Economy and Degrowth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-17, April.
    15. Bouchery, Yann & Hezarkhani, Behzad & Stauffer, Gautier, 2022. "Coalition formation and cost sharing for truck platooning," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 15-34.
    16. Brian Fabo & Miroslav BEBLAVY & Karolien LENAERTS & Zachary KILHOFFER, 2017. "An overview of European Platforms: Scope and Business Models," JRC Research Reports JRC109190, Joint Research Centre.
    17. Daisy Bertrand & Pierre-Yves Léo & Jean Philippe, 2019. "The New Go-Between Services: Peer-To-Peer Sharing Platforms In Hospitality Services," Post-Print hal-02299130, HAL.
    18. Daozhi Zhao & Jiaqin Hao & Cejun Cao & Hongshuai Han, 2019. "Evolutionary Game Analysis of Three-Player for Low-Carbon Production Capacity Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Chunfang Zhao & Yingliang Wu & Yunfeng Chen & Guohua Chen, 2023. "Multiscale Effects of Hedonic Attributes on Airbnb Listing Prices Based on MGWR: A Case Study of Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    20. García-Martínez, Jose A. & Mayor-Serra, Antonio J. & Meca, Ana, 2020. "Efficient Effort Equilibrium in Cooperation with Pairwise Cost Reduction," MPRA Paper 105604, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:10003-:d:1522384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.