IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/nathaz/v117y2023i3d10.1007_s11069-023-05982-3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Financial fund allocation in China's catastrophe insurance market: a game-theoretic analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Aoqing Li

    (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)

  • Zaiwu Gong

    (Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology)

  • Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest

    (Slippery Rock University)

Abstract

Chinese government-led disaster relief mode has been timely, comprehensive, and highly efficient. China usually adopts a government-led disaster relief model to burden a share of catastrophe losses. However, adopting such a model has also exposed some important problems, such as excessive pressure on the government relief fund and an emerging imbalance in the catastrophe insurance market. The government disaster relief fund is subdivided into four categories: pre-disaster subsidy provided to insurance companies, pre-disaster subsidy to residents, post-disaster relief subsidy to insurance companies, and post-disaster relief to residents. By constructing a three-party evolutionary game model involving the government, potential catastrophe insurance participants, and insurance companies, the equilibrium of the catastrophe insurance market and the influencing factors that promote the stability of the evolutionary game was explored under the cooperation mechanism of bounded rationality in this paper. The allocation of the government disaster relief fund to insurance companies of potential catastrophe insurance participants for both before and after a disaster was discussed. Furthermore, possible shortcomings of catastrophe insurance disaster relief mode in China were analyzed. Lastly, a solution to the problem of how to relieve pressure on the government relief fund and how to enhance the ability of catastrophe risk protection was put forward. It is of great significance for China to establish a catastrophe insurance market based on commercial insurance products.

Suggested Citation

  • Aoqing Li & Zaiwu Gong & Jeffrey Yi-Lin Forrest, 2023. "Financial fund allocation in China's catastrophe insurance market: a game-theoretic analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(3), pages 3181-3202, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:117:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-05982-3
    DOI: 10.1007/s11069-023-05982-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11069-023-05982-3
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11069-023-05982-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolyn Kousky & Howard Kunreuther, 2018. "Risk Management Roles of the Public and Private Sector," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 21(1), pages 181-204, March.
    2. Howard Kunreuther, 2015. "The Role of Insurance in Reducing Losses from Extreme Events: The Need for Public–Private Partnerships†," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 40(4), pages 741-762, October.
    3. Ling Tian & Peng Yao, 2015. "Preferences for earthquake insurance in rural China: factors influencing individuals’ willingness to pay," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 79(1), pages 93-110, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qihao He & Michael Faure & Chengwei Liu, 2023. "The possibilities and limits of insurance as governance in insuring pandemics," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 48(3), pages 641-668, July.
    2. Thomas Holzheu & Ginger Turner, 2018. "The Natural Catastrophe Protection Gap: Measurement, Root Causes and Ways of Addressing Underinsurance for Extreme Events†," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 43(1), pages 37-71, January.
    3. Harsh K. Mistry & Domenico Lombardi, 2023. "A stochastic exposure model for seismic risk assessment and pricing of catastrophe bonds," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(1), pages 803-829, May.
    4. Howard Kunreuther, 2020. "Risk Management Solutions for Climate Change–Induced Disasters," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2263-2271, November.
    5. S., Sai Krishnan & Iyer, Subramanian S., 2022. "Can waste aversion affect demand for insurance? Evidence from experiment and survey," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    6. Owen, Sally Margaret Frean, 2017. "The unfortunate regressivity of public natural disaster insurance: Quantifying distributional implications of EQC building cover for New Zealand," Working Paper Series 6720, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    7. Owen, Sally & Noy, Ilan, 2017. "The unfortunate regressivity of public natural hazard insurance: A quantitative analysis of a New Zealand case," Working Paper Series 20247, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    8. Nicolò Barbieri & Massimiliano Mazzanti & Anna Montini & Andrea Rampa, 2022. "Risk Attitudes to Catastrophic Events: VSL and WTP for Insurance Against Earthquakes," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 317-337, July.
    9. Poontirakul, Porntida & Brown, Charlotte & Noy, Ilan & Seville, Erica & Vargo, John, 2016. "The role of commercial insurance in post-disaster recovery: Quantitative evidence from the 2011 Christchurch earthquake," Working Paper Series 19396, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    10. Howard Kunreuther & Jason Schupp, 2021. "Evaluating the Role of Insurance in Managing Risk of Future Pandemics," NBER Working Papers 28968, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Ling-Yun He & Hong-Zhen Zhang, 2021. "Spillover or crowding out? The effects of environmental regulation on residents’ willingness to pay for environmental protection," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 105(1), pages 611-630, January.
    12. Swenja Surminski & Paul Hudson, 2017. "Investigating the Risk Reduction Potential of Disaster Insurance Across Europe," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 42(2), pages 247-274, April.
    13. Bih-Chuan Lin & Chun-Hung Lee, 2023. "Conducting an adaptive evaluation framework of importance and performance for community-based earthquake disaster management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 115(2), pages 1255-1274, January.
    14. Kendra Marcoux & Katherine R. H. Wagner, 2023. "Fifty Years of U.S. Natural Disaster Insurance Policy," CESifo Working Paper Series 10431, CESifo.
    15. W. J. Wouter Botzen & Érika Monteiro & Francisco Estrada & Giulia Pesaro & Scira Menoni, 2017. "Economic Assessment of Mitigating Damage of Flood Events: Cost–Benefit Analysis of Flood-Proofing Commercial Buildings in Umbria, Italy," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 42(4), pages 585-608, October.
    16. Noy, Ilan & Kusuma, Aditya & Nguyen, Cuong, 2017. "Insuring disasters: A survey of the economics of insurance programs for earthquakes and droughts," Working Paper Series 20250, Victoria University of Wellington, School of Economics and Finance.
    17. Sally Owen & Ilan Noy, 2017. "The Unfortunate Regressivity of Public Natural Hazard Insurance: A Quantitative Analysis of a New Zealand Case," CESifo Working Paper Series 6540, CESifo.
    18. Max Tesselaar & W. J. Wouter Botzen & Toon Haer & Paul Hudson & Timothy Tiggeloven & Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts, 2020. "Regional Inequalities in Flood Insurance Affordability and Uptake under Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-30, October.
    19. Ziqiang Han & Xiaoli Lu & Elisa I. Hörhager & Jubo Yan, 2017. "The effects of trust in government on earthquake survivors’ risk perception and preparedness in China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(1), pages 437-452, March.
    20. Francesco Masi & Donatella Porrini, 2021. "Cultural Heritage and natural disasters: the insurance choice of the Italian Cathedrals," Journal of Cultural Economics, Springer;The Association for Cultural Economics International, vol. 45(3), pages 409-433, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:nathaz:v:117:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s11069-023-05982-3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.